Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

How should pregnant women with spinal disease be managed?

Abstract

This Practice Point commentary discusses a retrospective case series by Han et al. that investigated the management of spinal disease during pregnancy. On the basis of their experiences with 10 patients, Han et al. concluded that pregnant women who have progressive neurological deficit at 34–36 weeks' gestation or later should undergo induction of delivery or cesarean section before, or at the same time as, they undergo spinal surgery. As expressed by Han et al., MRI is the safest imaging modality with which to diagnose spinal disorders in pregnancy; however, it is our opinion that single exposure to any source of radiation from diagnostic imaging is unlikely to justify advising the pregnant patient to undergo therapeutic abortion. Spinal surgery has successfully relieved neurological symptoms in pregnant patients with spinal disorders and been followed by a successful delivery in a number of circumstances. In order to provide the optimum care for the pregnant woman and the fetus, however, a health-care team involving the spine surgeon, the obstetrician, and the anesthesiologist is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Han IH et al. (2008) Clinical approach and surgical strategy for spinal diseases in pregnant women: a report of ten cases. Spine 33: E614–E619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown MD and Brookfield KF (2004) Lumbar disc excision and cesarean delivery during the same anesthesia: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86: 2030–2032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown MD and Levi AD (2001) Surgery for lumbar disc herniation during pregnancy. Spine 26: 440–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fahy UM et al. (1998) Surgical management of herniated lumbar disc in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 18: 544–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berlin L (1996) Radiation exposure and the pregnant patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167: 1377–1379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen MM et al. (2008) Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 112: 333–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ostgaard HC et al. (1991) Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy. Spine 16: 549–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. LaBan MM et al. (1983) Pregnancy and the herniated lumbar disc. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 64: 319–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark D Brown.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brookfield, K., Brown, M. How should pregnant women with spinal disease be managed?. Nat Rev Neurol 4, 652–653 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0952

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0952

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing