This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Responses of Five Different Artificial Intelligence Chatbots to the Top Searched Queries About Erectile Dysfunction: A Comparative Analysis
Journal of Medical Systems Open Access 03 April 2024
-
The efficacy of artificial intelligence in urology: a detailed analysis of kidney stone-related queries
World Journal of Urology Open Access 14 March 2024
-
Comment on: Assessing ChatGPT’s ability to answer questions pertaining to erectile dysfunction
International Journal of Impotence Research Open Access 11 March 2024
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 4 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $64.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Hswen Y, Nguyen TT. The inclusion of social determinants of health into evaluations of quality and appropriateness of AI assistant-ChatGPT. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023;2023:1.
Greene SM, Tuzzio L, Cherkin D. A framework for making patient-centered care front and center. Perm J. 2012;16:49.
National Academies of Sciences E and M, Division H and M, Practice B on PH and PH, States C on C-BS to PHE in the U, Baciu A, Negussie Y, et al. The root causes of health inequity. Communities action pathways to heal equity. 2017. p. 1–558. https://doi.org/10.17226/24624.
Di H, Wen Y. Will generalist medical artificial intelligence be the future path for health-related natural language processing models? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41391-023-00719-6.
Moor M, Banerjee O, Abad ZSH, Krumholz HM, Leskovec J, Topol EJ, et al. Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature. 2023;616:259–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AC and ED: manuscript development, manuscript writing/editing. MP, MLR, GIR, MGA, MF, GC, SC and AM: manuscript editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cocci, A., Pezzoli, M., Lo Re, M. et al. Quality of information and appropriateness of ChatGPT outputs for urology patients. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 27, 159–160 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00754-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00754-3
This article is cited by
-
Comment on: Assessing ChatGPT’s ability to answer questions pertaining to erectile dysfunction
International Journal of Impotence Research (2024)
-
Quality of information and appropriateness of Open AI outputs for prostate cancer
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2024)
-
Ejaculation sparing of classic and minimally invasive surgical treatments of LUTS/BPH
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2024)
-
Responses of Five Different Artificial Intelligence Chatbots to the Top Searched Queries About Erectile Dysfunction: A Comparative Analysis
Journal of Medical Systems (2024)
-
The efficacy of artificial intelligence in urology: a detailed analysis of kidney stone-related queries
World Journal of Urology (2024)