Abstract
In 1993, a passionate and provocative call to arms urged cereal researchers to consider the taxon they study as a single genetic system and collaborate with each other. Since then, that group of scientists has seen their discipline blossom. In an attempt to understand what unity of genetic systems means and how the notion was borne out by later research, we survey the progress and prospects of cereal genomics: sequence assemblies, population-scale sequencing, resistance gene cloning and domestication genetics. Gene order may not be as extraordinarily well conserved in the grasses as once thought. Still, several recurring themes have emerged. The same ancestral molecular pathways defining plant architecture have been co-opted in the evolution of different cereal crops. Such genetic convergence as much as cross-fertilization of ideas between cereal geneticists has led to a rich harvest of genes that, it is hoped, will lead to improved varieties.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennetzen, J. L. & Freeling, M. Grasses as a single genetic system: genome composition, collinearity and compatibility. Trends Genet. 9, 259–261 (1993).
Shantz, H. L. The place of grasslands in the Earth’s cover. Ecology 35, 143–145 (1954).
O’Mara, F. P. The role of grasslands in food security and climate change. Ann. Bot. 110, 1263–1270 (2012).
Suttie, J. M., Reynolds, S. G. & Batello, C. Grasslands of the World Vol. 34 (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2005).
Christenhusz, M. J. & Byng, J. W. The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa 261, 201–217 (2016).
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R. & Milo, R. The biomass distribution on Earth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6506–6511 (2018).
Blaive, F. Le rituel romain des ‘Robigalia’ et le sacrifice du chien dans le monde indo-européen. Latomus 54, 279–289 (1995).
Erisman, J. W., Sutton, M. A., Galloway, J., Klimont, Z. & Winiwarter, W. How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nat. Geosci. 1, 636–639 (2008).
Cabral, L., Pandey, P. & Xu, X. Epic narratives of the Green Revolution in Brazil, China, and India. Agric. Hum. Values 39, 249–267 (2022).
Ganetzky, B. & Hawley, R. S. The centenary of GENETICS: bridges to the future. Genetics 202, 15–23 (2015).
Crow, J. F. 90 years ago: the beginning of hybrid maize. Genetics 148, 923–928 (1998).
Przewieslik-Allen, A. M. et al. The role of gene flow and chromosomal instability in shaping the bread wheat genome. Nat. Plants 7, 172–183 (2021).
Wang, H. et al. Horizontal gene transfer of Fhb7 from fungus underlies Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Science 368, eaba5435 (2020).
Santra, M., Wang, H., Seifert, S. & Haley, S. Doubled haploid laboratory protocol for wheat using wheat–maize wide hybridization. Methods Mol. Biol. 1679, 235–249 (2017).
Risk, J. M. et al. The wheat Lr34 gene provides resistance against multiple fungal pathogens in barley. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11, 847–854 (2013).
Milne, R. J. et al. The wheat Lr67 gene from the sugar transport protein 13 family confers multipathogen resistance in barley. Plant Physiol. 179, 1285–1297 (2018).
Ahn, S. & Tanksley, S. D. Comparative linkage maps of the rice and maize genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7980–7984 (1993).
Kurata, N. et al. Conservation of genome structure between rice and wheat. Bio/Technol. 12, 276–278 (1994).
Hulbert, S. H., Richter, T. E., Axtell, J. D. & Bennetzen, J. L. Genetic mapping and characterization of sorghum and related crops by means of maize DNA probes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 4251–4255 (1990).
Huang, W. et al. A well-supported nuclear phylogeny of Poaceae and implications for the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Mol. Plant 15, 755–777 (2022).
Moore, G., Devos, K. M., Wang, Z. & Gale, M. D. Cereal genome evolution: grasses, line up and form a circle. Curr. Biol. 5, 737–739 (1995).
Kamal, N. et al. The mosaic oat genome gives insights into a uniquely healthy cereal crop. Nature 606, 113–119 (2022).
Martis, M. M. et al. Reticulate evolution of the rye genome. Plant Cell 25, 3685–3698 (2013).
Bennetzen, J. L. Comparative sequence analysis of plant nuclear genomes: microcolinearity and its many exceptions. Plant Cell 12, 1021–1029 (2000).
Sorrells, M. E. et al. Comparative DNA sequence analysis of wheat and rice genomes. Genome Res. 13, 1818–1827 (2003).
Feuillet, C. & Keller, B. High gene density is conserved at syntenic loci of small and large grass genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8265–8270 (1999).
Brueggeman, R. et al. The barley stem rust-resistance gene Rpg1 is a novel disease-resistance gene with homology to receptor kinases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9328–9333 (2002).
Mayer, K. F. X. et al. A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome. Science 345, 1251788 (2014).
Mayer, K. F. X. et al. Unlocking the barley genome by chromosomal and comparative genomics. Plant Cell 23, 1249–1263 (2011).
Sasaki, T. & International Rice Genome Sequencing Project. The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 436, 793–800 (2005).
Shang, L. et al. A complete assembly of the rice Nipponbare reference genome. Mol. Plant 16, 1232–1236 (2023).
Paterson, A. H. et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457, 551–556 (2009).
Vogel, J. P. et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature 463, 763–768 (2010).
Schulte, D. et al. The International Barley Sequencing Consortium—at the threshold of efficient access to the barley genome. Plant Physiol. 149, 142–147 (2009).
Gill, B. S. et al. A workshop report on wheat genome sequencing: International Genome Research on Wheat Consortium. Genetics 168, 1087–1096 (2004).
Metzker, M. L. Sequencing technologies—the next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 31–46 (2010).
Goodwin, S., McPherson, J. D. & McCombie, W. R. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 333–351 (2016).
Logsdon, G. A., Vollger, M. R. & Eichler, E. E. Long-read human genome sequencing and its applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 597–614 (2020).
De Coster, W., Weissensteiner, M. H. & Sedlazeck, F. J. Towards population-scale long-read sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 572–587 (2021).
Mascher, M. et al. Anchoring and ordering NGS contig assemblies by population sequencing (POPSEQ). Plant J. 76, 718–727 (2013).
Ariyadasa, R. et al. A sequence-ready physical map of barley anchored genetically by two million single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Plant Physiol. 164, 412–423 (2014).
van Oeveren, J. et al. Sequence-based physical mapping of complex genomes by whole genome profiling. Genome Res. 21, 618–625 (2011).
Eizenga, J. M. et al. Pangenome graphs. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 21, 139–162 (2020).
Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).
Wenger, A. M. et al. Accurate circular consensus long-read sequencing improves variant detection and assembly of a human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1155–1162 (2019).
Kaplan, N. & Dekker, J. High-throughput genome scaffolding from in vivo DNA interaction frequency. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1143–1147 (2013).
Burton, J. N. et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1119–1125 (2013).
Navrátilová, P. et al. Prospects of telomere-to-telomere assembly in barley: analysis of sequence gaps in the MorexV3 reference genome. Plant Biotechnol. J. 20, 1373–1386 (2022).
Mascher, M. et al. Long-read sequence assembly: a technical evaluation in barley. Plant Cell 33, 1888–1906 (2021).
Sato, K. et al. Chromosome-scale genome assembly of the transformation-amenable common wheat cultivar ‘Fielder’. DNA Res. 28, dsab008 (2021).
Kale, S. M. et al. A catalogue of resistance gene homologs and a chromosome-scale reference sequence support resistance gene mapping in winter wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 20, 1730–1742 (2022).
Athiyannan, N. et al. Long-read genome sequencing of bread wheat facilitates disease resistance gene cloning. Nat. Genet. 54, 227–231 (2022).
Lang, D. et al. Comparison of the two up-to-date sequencing technologies for genome assembly: HiFi reads of Pacific Biosciences Sequel II system and ultralong reads of Oxford Nanopore. GigaScience 9, giaa123 (2020).
Gale, M. D. & Devos, K. M. Plant comparative genetics after 10 years. Science 282, 656–659 (1998).
Mascher, M. et al. Genebank genomics bridges the gap between the conservation of crop diversity and plant breeding. Nat. Genet. 51, 1076–1081 (2019).
McCouch, S. R., McNally, K. L., Wang, W. & Sackville Hamilton, R. Genomics of gene banks: a case study in rice. Am. J. Bot. 99, 407–423 (2012).
Elshire, R. J. et al. A robust, simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6, e19379 (2011).
De Beukelaer, H., Davenport, G. F. & Fack, V. Core Hunter 3: flexible core subset selection. BMC Bioinform. 19, 203 (2018).
Romay, M. C. et al. Comprehensive genotyping of the USA national maize inbred seed bank. Genome Biol. 14, R55 (2013).
Morris, G. P. et al. Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 453–458 (2013).
Milner, S. G. et al. Genebank genomics highlights the diversity of a global barley collection. Nat. Genet. 51, 319–326 (2019).
Sansaloni, C. et al. Diversity analysis of 80,000 wheat accessions reveals consequences and opportunities of selection footprints. Nat. Commun. 11, 4572 (2020).
Wang, W. et al. Genomic variation in 3,010 diverse accessions of Asian cultivated rice. Nature 557, 43–49 (2018).
Mayer, M. et al. Genetic diversity of European maize landraces: dataset on the molecular and phenotypic variation of derived doubled-haploid populations. Data Brief. 42, 108164 (2022).
Barton, N. H., Etheridge, A. M. & Véber, A. The infinitesimal model: definition, derivation, and implications. Theor. Popul. Biol. 118, 50–73 (2017).
Meuwissen, T. H., Hayes, B. J. & Goddard, M. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819–1829 (2001).
Juliana, P. et al. Improving grain yield, stress resilience and quality of bread wheat using large-scale genomics. Nat. Genet. 51, 1530–1539 (2019).
Schulthess, A. W. et al. Genomics-informed prebreeding unlocks the diversity in genebanks for wheat improvement. Nat. Genet. 54, 1544–1552 (2022).
Gonzalez, M. Y. et al. Genomic prediction models trained with historical records enable populating the German ex situ genebank bio-digital resource center of barley (Hordeum sp.) with information on resistances to soilborne barley mosaic viruses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 134, 2181–2196 (2021).
Romero Navarro, J. A. et al. A study of allelic diversity underlying flowering-time adaptation in maize landraces. Nat. Genet. 49, 476–480 (2017).
Yu, X. et al. Genomic prediction contributing to a promising global strategy to turbocharge gene banks. Nat. Plants 2, 16150 (2016).
Xu, S., Zhu, D. & Zhang, Q. Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12456–12461 (2014).
El Hanafi, S. et al. Genomic predictions to leverage phenotypic data across genebanks. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1227656 (2023).
Poland, J. A., Brown, P. J., Sorrells, M. E. & Jannink, J.-L. Development of high-density genetic maps for barley and wheat using a novel two-enzyme Genotyping-by-Sequencing approach. PLoS ONE 7, e32253 (2012).
Mascher, M. et al. Barley whole exome capture: a tool for genomic research in the genus Hordeum and beyond. Plant J. 76, 494–505 (2013).
Steuernagel, B. et al. Rapid cloning of disease-resistance genes in plants using mutagenesis and sequence capture. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 652–655 (2016).
Sánchez-Martín, J. et al. Rapid gene isolation in barley and wheat by mutant chromosome sequencing. Genome Biol. 17, 221 (2016).
Jayakodi, M., Schreiber, M., Stein, N. & Mascher, M. Building pan-genome infrastructures for crop plants and their use in association genetics. DNA Res. 28, dsaa030 (2021).
Hufford, M. B. et al. De novo assembly, annotation, and comparative analysis of 26 diverse maize genomes. Science 373, 655–662 (2021).
Walkowiak, S. et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature 588, 277–283 (2020).
Jayakodi, M. et al. The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding. Nature 588, 284–289 (2020).
Sella, G. & Hirsh, A. E. The application of statistical physics to evolutionary biology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9541–9546 (2005).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature 475, 493–496 (2011).
Wang, L. et al. The interplay of demography and selection during maize domestication and expansion. Genome Biol. 18, 215 (2017).
Gutaker, R. M. et al. Genomic history and ecology of the geographic spread of rice. Nat. Plants 6, 492–502 (2020).
Zhao, X. et al. Population genomics unravels the Holocene history of bread wheat and its relatives. Nat. Plants 9, 403–419 (2023).
Smith, O. et al. A domestication history of dynamic adaptation and genomic deterioration in Sorghum. Nat. Plants 5, 369–379 (2019).
Reich, D. et al. Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in Siberia. Nature 468, 1053–1060 (2010).
Green, R. E. et al. A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science 328, 710–722 (2010).
Feldman, M. et al. Late Pleistocene human genome suggests a local origin for the first farmers of central Anatolia. Nat. Commun. 10, 1218 (2019).
Lazaridis, I. et al. Genomic insights into the origin of farming in the ancient Near East. Nature 536, 419–424 (2016).
Swarts, K. et al. Genomic estimation of complex traits reveals ancient maize adaptation to temperate North America. Science 357, 512–515 (2017).
Kistler, L. et al. Archaeological Central American maize genomes suggest ancient gene flow from South America. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 33124–33129 (2020).
Mascher, M. et al. Genomic analysis of 6,000-year-old cultivated grain illuminates the domestication history of barley. Nat. Genet. 48, 1089–1093 (2016).
Scott, M. F. et al. A 3,000-year-old Egyptian emmer wheat genome reveals dispersal and domestication history. Nat. Plants 5, 1120–1128 (2019).
Barnes, A. C. et al. An adaptive teosinte mexicana introgression modulates phosphatidylcholine levels and is associated with maize flowering time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2100036119 (2022).
Guo, Y., Himmelbach, A., Weiss, E., Stein, N. & Mascher, M. Six-rowed wild-growing barleys are hybrids of diverse origins. Plant J. 111, 849–858 (2022).
Wang, H., Vieira, F. G., Crawford, J. E., Chu, C. & Nielsen, R. Asian wild rice is a hybrid swarm with extensive gene flow and feralization from domesticated rice. Genome Res. 27, 1029–1038 (2017).
Levy, A. A. & Feldman, M. Evolution and origin of bread wheat. Plant Cell 34, 2549–2567 (2022).
Borrill, P., Harrington, S. A. & Uauy, C. Applying the latest advances in genomics and phenomics for trait discovery in polyploid wheat. Plant J. 97, 56–72 (2019).
Ramírez-González, R. H. et al. The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat. Science 361, eaar6089 (2018).
Dubcovsky, J. & Dvorak, J. Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316, 1862–1866 (2007).
The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC). Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 361, eaar7191 (2018).
Avni, R. et al. Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication. Science 357, 93–97 (2017).
Luo, M. C. et al. Genome sequence of the progenitor of the wheat D genome Aegilops tauschii. Nature 551, 498–502 (2017).
Tamborski, J. & Krasileva, K. V. Evolution of plant NLRs: from natural history to precise modifications. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71, 355–378 (2020).
Hafeez, A. N. et al. Creation and judicious application of a wheat resistance gene atlas. Mol. Plant 14, 1053–1070 (2021).
Adamski, N. M. et al. A roadmap for gene functional characterisation in crops with large genomes: lessons from polyploid wheat. eLife 9, e55646 (2020).
Gaurav, K. et al. Population genomic analysis of Aegilops tauschii identifies targets for bread wheat improvement. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 422–431 (2022).
Yu, G. et al. Aegilops sharonensis genome-assisted identification of stem rust resistance gene Sr62. Nat. Commun. 13, 1607 (2022).
Arora, S. et al. Resistance gene cloning from a wild crop relative by sequence capture and association genetics. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 139–143 (2019).
Collins, F. S. & McKusick, V. A. Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science. JAMA 285, 540–544 (2001).
Barragan, A. C. & Weigel, D. Plant NLR diversity: the known unknowns of pan-NLRomes. Plant Cell 33, 814–831 (2021).
Michelmore, R. W. & Meyers, B. C. Clusters of resistance genes in plants evolve by divergent selection and a birth-and-death process. Genome Res. 8, 1113–1130 (1998).
Bennetzen, J. L. & Ma, J. The genetic colinearity of rice and other cereals on the basis of genomic sequence analysis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 128–133 (2003).
Jupe, F. et al. Resistance gene enrichment sequencing (RenSeq) enables reannotation of the NB-LRR gene family from sequenced plant genomes and rapid mapping of resistance loci in segregating populations. Plant J. 76, 530–544 (2013).
Van de Weyer, A. L. et al. A species-wide inventory of NLR genes and alleles in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell 178, 1260–1272.e14 (2019).
Marone, M. P., Singh, H. C., Pozniak, C. J. & Mascher, M. A technical guide to TRITEX, a computational pipeline for chromosome-scale sequence assembly of plant genomes. Plant Methods 18, 128 (2022).
Li, Y. et al. Dissection of a rapidly evolving wheat resistance gene cluster by long-read genome sequencing accelerated the cloning of Pm69. Plant Commun. 5, 100646 (2024).
Moore, J. W. et al. A recently evolved hexose transporter variant confers resistance to multiple pathogens in wheat. Nat. Genet. 47, 1494–1498 (2015).
Krattinger, S. G. et al. A putative ABC transporter confers durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat. Science 323, 1360–1363 (2009).
Sallam, A. H. et al. Genome-wide association mapping of stem rust resistance in Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum. G3 (Bethesda) 7, 3491–3507 (2017).
Dinh, H. X. et al. The barley leaf rust resistance gene Rph3 encodes a predicted membrane protein and is induced upon infection by avirulent pathotypes of Puccinia hordei. Nat. Commun. 13, 2386 (2022).
Hewitt, T. et al. A highly differentiated region of wheat chromosome 7AL encodes a Pm1a immune receptor that recognizes its corresponding AvrPm1a effector from Blumeria graminis. N. Phytol. 229, 2812–2826 (2021).
Huang, R. et al. Genetic bases of rice grain shape: so many genes, so little known. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 218–226 (2013).
Ashikari, M. et al. Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 309, 741–745 (2005).
Mao, H. et al. Linking differential domain functions of the GS3 protein to natural variation of grain size in rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19579–19584 (2010).
Liu, J. et al. GW5 acts in the brassinosteroid signalling pathway to regulate grain width and weight in rice. Nat. Plants 3, 17043 (2017).
Sano, Y. Differential regulation of waxy gene expression in rice endosperm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 68, 467–473 (1984).
Huang, X. et al. Natural variation at the DEP1 locus enhances grain yield in rice. Nat. Genet. 41, 494–497 (2009).
Uauy, C., Distelfeld, A., Fahima, T., Blechl, A. & Dubcovsky, J. A NAC gene regulating senescence improves grain protein, zinc, and iron content in wheat. Science 314, 1298–1301 (2006).
Simons, K. J. et al. Molecular characterization of the major wheat domestication gene Q. Genetics 172, 547–555 (2006).
Taketa, S. et al. Barley grain with adhering hulls is controlled by an ERF family transcription factor gene regulating a lipid biosynthesis pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 4062–4067 (2008).
Ramsay, L. et al. INTERMEDIUM-C, a modifier of lateral spikelet fertility in barley, is an ortholog of the maize domestication gene TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1. Nat. Genet. 43, 169–172 (2011).
Vavilova, V., Konopatskaia, I., Kuznetsova, A. E., Blinov, A. & Goncharov, N. P. DEP1 gene in wheat species with normal, compactoid and compact spikes. BMC Genet. 18, 106 (2017).
Wing, R. A., Purugganan, M. D. & Zhang, Q. The rice genome revolution: from an ancient grain to Green Super Rice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 505–517 (2018).
Jackson, S. A. Rice: the first crop genome. Rice 9, 14 (2016).
Fuller, D. Q. Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: recent archaeobotanical insights from the Old World. Ann. Bot. 100, 903–924 (2007).
Purugganan, M. D. & Fuller, D. Q. The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature 457, 843–848 (2009).
Abbo, S. et al. Plant domestication versus crop evolution: a conceptual framework for cereals and grain legumes. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 351–360 (2014).
Kellogg, E. A. Genetic control of branching patterns in grass inflorescences. Plant Cell 34, 2518–2533 (2022).
Beadle, G. W. The ancestry of corn. Sci. Am. 242, 112–119 (1980).
Doebley, J. Mapping the genes that made maize. Trends Genet. 8, 302–307 (1992).
Doebley, J., Stec, A. & Hubbard, L. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386, 485–488 (1997).
Studer, A., Zhao, Q., Ross-Ibarra, J. & Doebley, J. Identification of a functional transposon insertion in the maize domestication gene tb1. Nat. Genet. 43, 1160–1163 (2011).
Jiao, Y. et al. Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice. Nat. Genet. 42, 541–544 (2010).
Sreenivasulu, N. & Schnurbusch, T. A genetic playground for enhancing grain number in cereals. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 91–101 (2012).
Sakuma, S. & Schnurbusch, T. Of floral fortune: tinkering with the grain yield potential of cereal crops. N. Phytol. 225, 1873–1882 (2020).
Komatsuda, T. et al. Six-rowed barley originated from a mutation in a homeodomain–leucine zipper I–class homeobox gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1424–1429 (2007).
Sakuma, S. et al. Unleashing floret fertility in wheat through the mutation of a homeobox gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5182–5187 (2019).
Koppolu, R. et al. Six-rowed spike4 (Vrs4) controls spikelet determinacy and row-type in barley. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13198–13203 (2013).
van Esse, G. W. et al. Six-Rowed Spike3 (VRS3) is a histone demethylase that controls lateral spikelet development in barley. Plant Physiol. 174, 2397–2408 (2017).
Bull, H. et al. Barley SIX-ROWED SPIKE3 encodes a putative Jumonji C-type H3K9me2/me3 demethylase that represses lateral spikelet fertility. Nat. Commun. 8, 936 (2017).
Youssef, H. M. et al. VRS2 regulates hormone-mediated inflorescence patterning in barley. Nat. Genet. 49, 157–161 (2017).
Fuller, D. Q. & Allaby, R. in Annual Plant Reviews: Fruit Development and Seed Dispersal Vol. 38 (ed. Østergaard, L.) 238–295 (Blackwell, 2009).
Morrell, P. L. & Clegg, M. T. Genetic evidence for a second domestication of barley Hordeum vulgare east of the Fertile Crescent. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3289–3294 (2007).
Zeng, X. et al. The brittle rachis trait in species belonging to the Triticeae and its controlling genes Btr1 and Btr2. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 1000 (2020).
Nave, M. et al. The independent domestication of Timopheev’s wheat: insights from haplotype analysis of the Brittle rachis 1 (BTR1-A) gene. Genes 12, 338 (2021).
Nave, M. et al. Wheat domestication in light of haplotype analyses of the Brittle rachis 1 genes (BTR1-A and BTR1-B). Plant Sci. 285, 193–199 (2019).
Konishi, S. et al. An SNP caused loss of seed shattering during rice domestication. Science 312, 1392–1396 (2006).
Ishikawa, R. et al. Allelic interaction at seed-shattering loci in the genetic backgrounds of wild and cultivated rice species. Genes Genet. Syst. 85, 265–271 (2010).
Htun, T. M., Inoue, C., Chhourn, O., Ishii, T. & Ishikawa, R. Effect of quantitative trait loci for seed shattering on abscission layer formation in Asian wild rice Oryza rufipogon. Breed. Sci. 64, 199–205 (2014).
Inoue, C. et al. Inhibition of abscission layer formation by an interaction of two seed-shattering loci, sh4 and qSH3, in rice. Genes Genet. Syst. 90, 1–9 (2015).
Lin, Z. et al. Parallel domestication of the Shattering1 genes in cereals. Nat. Genet. 44, 720–724 (2012).
Liu, H. et al. Transposon insertion drove the loss of natural seed shattering during foxtail millet domestication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msac078 (2022).
Poncet, V. et al. Comparative analysis of QTLs affecting domestication traits between two domesticated × wild pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L., Poaceae) crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104, 965–975 (2002).
Ishikawa, R. et al. A stepwise route to domesticate rice by controlling seed shattering and panicle shape. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2121692119 (2022).
Paterson, A. H. et al. Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science 269, 1714–1718 (1995).
Gabaldón, T. & Koonin, E. V. Functional and evolutionary implications of gene orthology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 360–366 (2013).
Wicker, T. et al. A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 973–982 (2007).
Brenchley, R. et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 491, 705–710 (2012).
International Barley Genome Sequencing Consortium. A physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome. Nature 491, 711–716 (2012).
Beier, S. et al. Multiplex sequencing of bacterial artificial chromosomes for assembling complex plant genomes. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 1511–1522 (2016).
Chen, J. et al. A complete telomere-to-telomere assembly of the maize genome. Nat. Genet. 55, 1221–1231 (2023).
Morgante, M. et al. Gene duplication and exon shuffling by helitron-like transposons generate intraspecies diversity in maize. Nat. Genet. 37, 997–1002 (2005).
SanMiguel, P., Gaut, B. S., Tikhonov, A., Nakajima, Y. & Bennetzen, J. L. The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize. Nat. Genet. 20, 43–45 (1998).
Wicker, T. et al. Analysis of a contiguous 211 kb sequence in diploid wheat (Triticum monococcum L.) reveals multiple mechanisms of genome evolution. Plant J. 26, 307–316 (2001).
Chen, M. et al. Microcolinearity in sh2-homologous regions of the maize, rice, and sorghum genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3431–3435 (1997).
Stein, J. C. et al. Genomes of 13 domesticated and wild rice relatives highlight genetic conservation, turnover and innovation across the genus Oryza. Nat. Genet. 50, 285–296 (2018).
Ou, S. et al. Benchmarking transposable element annotation methods for creation of a streamlined, comprehensive pipeline. Genome Biol. 20, 275 (2019).
Gozashti, L. & Hoekstra, H. E. Accounting for diverse transposable element landscapes is key to developing and evaluating accurate de novo annotation strategies. Genome Biol. 25, 4 (2024).
Soyk, S., Benoit, M. & Lippman, Z. B. New horizons for dissecting epistasis in crop quantitative trait variation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 54, 287–307 (2020).
Marand, A. P., Eveland, A. L., Kaufmann, K. & Springer, N. M. cis-Regulatory elements in plant development, adaptation, and evolution. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 74, 111–137 (2023).
Zhao, L. et al. Integrative analysis of reference epigenomes in 20 rice varieties. Nat. Commun. 11, 2658 (2020).
Marand, A. P., Chen, Z., Gallavotti, A. & Schmitz, R. J. A cis-regulatory atlas in maize at single-cell resolution. Cell 184, 3041–3055.e3021 (2021).
Jiao, Y. et al. A transcriptome atlas of rice cell types uncovers cellular, functional and developmental hierarchies. Nat. Genet. 41, 258–263 (2009).
Stelpflug, S. C. et al. An expanded maize gene expression atlas based on RNA sequencing and its use to explore root development. Plant Genome https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2015.04.0025 (2016).
Marx, V. Method of the year: spatially resolved transcriptomics. Nat. Methods 18, 9–14 (2021).
Stuart, T. & Satija, R. Integrative single-cell analysis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 257–272 (2019).
Lewin, H. A. et al. Earth BioGenome Project: sequencing life for the future of life. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4325–4333 (2018).
The Darwin Tree of Life Project Consortiumet al. Sequence locally, think globally: the Darwin Tree of Life Project. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2115642118 (2022).
Olmstead, R. G. & Bohs, L. A summary of molecular systematic research in Solanaceae: 1982–2006. In VI International Solanaceae Conference: Genomics Meets Biodiversity (eds Spooner, D. M. et al.) 255–268 (ISHS, 2007).
Burgin, C. J., Colella, J. P., Kahn, P. L. & Upham, N. S. How many species of mammals are there? J. Mammal. 99, 1–14 (2018).
McSteen, P. & Kellogg, E. A. Molecular, cellular, and developmental foundations of grass diversity. Science 377, 599–602 (2022).
Linquist, S., Doolittle, W. F. & Palazzo, A. F. Getting clear about the F-word in genomics. PLoS Genet. 16, e1008702 (2020).
Dixon, L. E. et al. TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 regulates inflorescence architecture and development in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Cell 30, 563–581 (2018).
Bennett, T. & Dixon, L. E. Asymmetric expansions of FT and TFL1 lineages characterize differential evolution of the EuPEBP family in the major angiosperm lineages. BMC Biol. 19, 181 (2021).
Yan, L. et al. The wheat and barley vernalization gene VRN3 is an orthologue of FT. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19581–19586 (2006).
Putterill, J. & Varkonyi-Gasic, E. FT and florigen long-distance flowering control in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 33, 77–82 (2016).
Jacob, F. Evolution and tinkering. Science 196, 1161–1166 (1977).
Bowman, J. L. The origin of a land flora. Nat. Plants 8, 1352–1369 (2022).
Blake, V. C. et al. The Triticeae Toolbox: combining phenotype and genotype data to advance small‐grains breeding. Plant Genome https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2014.12.0099 (2016).
Yao, E. et al. GrainGenes: a data-rich repository for small grains genetics and genomics. Database 2022, baac034 (2022).
Ko, S. et al. GWAS of longitudinal trajectories at biobank scale. Am. J. Hum. Genet 109, 433–445 (2022).
Kawahara, Y. et al. Improvement of the Oryza sativa Nipponbare reference genome using next generation sequence and optical map data. Rice (N. Y.) 6, 4 (2013).
McCormick, R. F. et al. The Sorghum bicolor reference genome: improved assembly, gene annotations, a transcriptome atlas, and signatures of genome organization. Plant J. 93, 338–354 (2018).
International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC). A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome. Science 345, 1251788 (2014).
Mascher, M. et al. A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome. Nature 544, 427–433 (2017).
Monat, C. et al. TRITEX: chromosome-scale sequence assembly of Triticeae genomes with open-source tools. Genome Biol. 20, 284 (2019).
Schnable, P. S. et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326, 1112–1115 (2009).
Cannarozzi, G. et al. Genome and transcriptome sequencing identifies breeding targets in the orphan crop tef (Eragrostis tef). BMC Genomics 15, 581 (2014).
VanBuren, R. et al. Exceptional subgenome stability and functional divergence in the allotetraploid Ethiopian cereal teff. Nat. Commun. 11, 884 (2020).
Bauer, E. et al. Towards a whole-genome sequence for rye (Secale cereale L.). Plant J. 89, 853–869 (2017).
Rabanus-Wallace, M. T. et al. Chromosome-scale genome assembly provides insights into rye biology, evolution and agronomic potential. Nat. Genet. 53, 564–573 (2021).
Li, G. et al. A high-quality genome assembly highlights rye genomic characteristics and agronomically important genes. Nat. Genet. 53, 574–584 (2021).
Soreng, R. J. et al. A worldwide phylogenetic classification of the Poaceae (Gramineae) III: an update. J. Syst. Evol. 60, 476–521 (2022).
Gallaher, T. J. et al. Grasses through space and time: an overview of the biogeographical and macroevolutionary history of Poaceae. J. Syst. Evol. 60, 522–569 (2022).
Lovell, J. T. et al. GENESPACE tracks regions of interest and gene copy number variation across multiple genomes. eLife 11, e78526 (2022).
Brunner, S., Fengler, K., Morgante, M., Tingey, S. & Rafalski, A. Evolution of DNA sequence nonhomologies among maize inbreds. Plant Cell 17, 343–360 (2005).
Liao, W.-W. et al. A draft human pangenome reference. Nature 617, 312–324 (2023).
Liu, J. et al. Gapless assembly of maize chromosomes using long-read technologies. Genome Biol. 21, 121 (2020).
Zhang, Y. et al. The telomere-to-telomere gap-free genome of four rice parents reveals SV and PAV patterns in hybrid rice breeding. Plant Biotechnol. J. 20, 1642–1644 (2022).
Nurk, S. et al. The complete sequence of a human genome. Science 376, 44–53 (2022).
Altemose, N. et al. Complete genomic and epigenetic maps of human centromeres. Science 376, eabl4178 (2022).
Tulpová, Z. et al. Fine structure and transcription dynamics of bread wheat ribosomal DNA loci deciphered by a multi-omics approach. Plant Genome 15, e20191 (2022).
Kapustová, V. et al. The dark matter of large cereal genomes: long tandem repeats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 2483 (2019).
Ahmed, H. I. et al. Einkorn genomics sheds light on history of the oldest domesticated wheat. Nature 620, 830–838 (2023).
Acknowledgements
Barley genomic research in the labs of N.S. and M.M. is supported by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, SHAPE-P3, 031B1302A). M.M.’s work on barley wild relatives is funded by the European Research Council (Starting Grant TRANSFER, action number 949873).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.M. drafted the manuscript. M.P.M., M.S. and N.S. designed the display items. All authors edited the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mascher, M., Marone, M.P., Schreiber, M. et al. Are cereal grasses a single genetic system?. Nat. Plants (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01674-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01674-3