Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Brain networks

Complex topology meets simple statistics

In this issue, Shinn et al. demonstrate a close relationship between complex brain network topology and lower-level statistical properties of neuroimaging data. They also highlight the potential of these statistical measures, which capture similarity in space and time, to provide imaging-based markers of aging and pharmacological states.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Illustration of spatial and temporal autocorrelation in fMRI measurements of the human brain.

References

  1. Bullmore, E. & Sporns, O. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186–198 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shinn, M. et al. Nat. Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01299-3 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fallon, J. et al. Netw. Neurosci. 4, 788–806 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Uddin, L. Q. Trends Cogn. Sci. 24, 734–746 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Friston, K. J. et al. Neuroimage 2, 45–53 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McDonough, I. M. & Nashiro, K. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 409 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zou, Q. H. et al. J. Neurosci. Methods 172, 137–141 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Huntenburg, J. M., Bazin, P. L. & Margulies, D. S. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22, 21–31 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bijsterbosch, J. D. et al. eLife 7, e32992 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kong, R. et al. Cereb. Cortex 31, 4477–4500 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yousefi, B., Shin, J., Schumacher, E. H. & Keilholz, S. D. Neuroimage 167, 297–308 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts, J. A. et al. Nat. Commun. 10, 1056 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Das, A., Murphy, K. & Drew, P. J. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 376, 20190635 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sadaghiani, S. & Wirsich, J. Netw. Neurosci. 4, 1–29 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin, C. G., He, B. J. & Chang, C. Neuroimage 244, 118590 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from NIH RF1MH125931.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catie Chang.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Chang, C. Complex topology meets simple statistics. Nat Neurosci 26, 732–734 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01295-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01295-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing