We need consensus to accurately evaluate the performance and potential of emerging water production technologies, such as solar evaporation and atmospheric water harvesting. Here we recommend practices that would allow a fair basis to compare different studies, and help to align research input with actual demand.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Three-dimensional open architecture enabling salt-rejection solar evaporators with boosted water production efficiency
Nature Communications Open Access 04 November 2022
-
Exceptional water production yield enabled by batch-processed portable water harvester in semi-arid climate
Nature Communications Open Access 15 September 2022
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Tao, P. et al. Nat. Energy 3, 1031–1041 (2018).
Ejeian, M. & Wang, R. Z. Joule 5, 1678–1703 (2021).
Lord, J. et al. Nature 598, 611–617 (2021).
Chen, C., Kuang, Y. & Hu, L. Joule 3, 683–718 (2019).
Li, X. et al. Joule 3, 1798–1803 (2019).
Zhao, F. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 489–495 (2018).
Zhang, L. et al. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 1771–1793 (2021).
Nandakumar, D. K. et al. Adv. Mater. 31, 1806730 (2019).
Zhao, F. et al. Adv. Mater. 31, 1806446 (2019).
Peeters, R. et al. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 6, 2016–2034 (2020).
LaPotin, A. et al. Joule 5, 166–182 (2021).
Zhang, Y. et al. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 4891–4902 (2020).
Wang, F. et al. Joule 5, 1602–1612 (2021).
Yao, H. et al. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 5330–5338 (2021).
Dongare, P. D. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6936–6941 (2017).
Dongare, P. D. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 13182–13187 (2019).
Chen, W. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 5701–5710 (2003).
Hanikel, N. et al. Science 374, 454–459 (2021).
Legrand, U. et al. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60, 12923–12933 (2021).
Kim, H. et al. Science 356, 430–434 (2017).
Li, R. et al. Nat. Sustain. 3, 636–643 (2020).
LaPotin, A. et al. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 1588–1597 (2019).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 (R-284-000-217-112).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Sustainability thanks Jason Robert Tavares, Zuankai Wang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Tan, S.C. Best practices for solar water production technologies. Nat Sustain 5, 554–556 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00880-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00880-1
This article is cited by
-
Bridging materials innovations to sorption-based atmospheric water harvesting devices
Nature Reviews Materials (2024)
-
Going beyond efficiency for solar evaporation
Nature Water (2023)
-
Passive solar desalination towards high efficiency and salt rejection via a reverse-evaporating water layer of millimetre-scale thickness
Nature Water (2023)
-
Polyoxometalates for continuous power generation by atmospheric humidity
Nano Research (2023)
-
Exceptional water production yield enabled by batch-processed portable water harvester in semi-arid climate
Nature Communications (2022)