Abstract
Water and wastewater systems are critical infrastructure whose disruption directly threatens public health, economic growth and the reliability and functionality of other critical infrastructure. Hybrid urban water supply systems that combine conventional, centralized water sources with distributed reclaimed wastewater offer potential energy savings and reduced freshwater use. Here we show that such hybrid water supply systems are also more resilient than conventional centralized systems. Using Houston’s municipal water system as a case study, we explore the resilience of hybrid systems compared with centralized ones under various disruptions including pump station failures, pipe leakage and source water contamination. Our quantitative analysis reveals that the hybrid configuration demonstrates lower severity, impact range and downtime during substandard performance, especially benefiting low-pressure areas vulnerable to disruptions. We also identified vulnerable components in the current system along with appropriate mitigation strategies that account for local geographical constraints. These findings emphasize the imperative of considering alternative system configurations to safeguard water infrastructure and mitigate risks efficiently.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$99.00 per year
only $8.25 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from Houston Public Works, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and so are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Houston Public Works.
Code availability
The software and custom-developed code for this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Critical Infrastructure Sectors (CISA, 2013); https://www.cisa.gov/critical-infrastructure-sectors
Daigger, G. T. Wastewater management in the 21st century. J. Environ. Eng. 133, 671–680 (2007).
Davis, C. A. Understanding functionality and operability for infrastructure system resilience. Nat. Hazards Rev. 22, 06020005 (2021).
Di Nardo, A. et al. Redundancy features of water distribution systems. Procedia Eng. 186, 412–419 (2017).
Report Card for America’s Infrastructure—Drinking Water (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784478851
Summary and Policy Implications Vision 2030: The Resilience of Water Supply and Sanitation in the Face of Climate Change (WHO, 2009); https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44172/9789241598422_eng.pdf?sequence=1
Folkman, S. Water Main Break Rates in the USA and Canada: A Comprehensive Study (Utah State Univ., 2018); https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1173&context=mae_facpub
Tabuchi, H. $300 billion war beneath the street: fighting to replace America’s water pipes. New York Times (10 November 2017).
Dieter, C. A. et al. Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2015. Circular 1441 (USGS, 2018); https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1441
The Case for Fixing the Leaks: Protecting People and Saving Water While Supporting Economic Growth in the Great Lakes Region (CNT, 2013); https://www.cnt.org/sites/default/files/publications/CNT_CaseforFixingtheLeaks.pdf
O’Connell, Pa. M., Reyes, C., Gregory, T. & Caputo, A. Billions lost, millions wasted: why Chicago area residents pay millions for water that never reaches their taps. Chicago Tribune (25 October 2017).
Busby, J. W. et al. Cascading risks: understanding the 2021 winter blackout in Texas. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 77, 102106 (2021).
Denchak, M. Flint water crisis: everything you need to know (NRDC, 2018); https://www.nrdc.org/stories/flint-water-crisis-everything-you-need-know#sec-timeline
Bezanson, Philip J., Morgan, Vincent E., Springer, David & Cahoon, Claire E. Florida water system hack highlights challenges for public utility cybersecurity. National Law Review (24 February 2021).
Zodrow, K. R. et al. Advanced materials, technologies, and complex systems analyses: emerging opportunities to enhance urban water security. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 10274–10281 (2017).
Water Reuse Action Plan (US EPA, 2023); https://www.epa.gov/waterreuse/water-reuse-action-plan
Council, N. R. Water Reuse: Potential for Expanding the Nation’s Water Supply Through Reuse of Municipal Wastewater (National Academies Press, 2012); https://doi.org/10.17226/13303
Liu, L. et al. The importance of system configuration for distributed direct potable water reuse. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0518-5 (2020).
Drechsel, P., Qadir, M. & Baumann, J. Water reuse to free up freshwater for higher-value use and increase climate resilience and water productivity. Irrig. Drain. 71, 100–109 (2022).
Sim, A. & Mauter, M. U.S. Indirect and Direct Potable Water Reuse Systems (2020) (NAWI Water DAMS, 2020); https://doi.org/10.7481/1787485
Gerling, A. Potable Reuse 101: An Innovative and Sustainable Water Supply Solution (American Water Works Association, 2016); https://cawaterlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Pages-from-Potable-Reuse-101.pdf
Haarhoff, J. & Van der Merwe, B. Twenty-five years of wastewater reclamation in Windhoek, Namibia. Water Sci. Technol. 33, 25–35 (1996).
Maseeh, G. P., Russell, C. G., Villalobos, S. L., Balliew, J. E. & Trejo, G. El Paso’s advanced water purification facility: a new direction in potable reuse. J. Am. Water Work. Assoc. https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2015.107.0168 (2015).
Kavvada, O., Nelson, K. L. & Horvath, A. Spatial optimization for decentralized non-potable water reuse. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 064001 (2018).
Hering, J. G., Waite, T. D., Luthy, R. G., Drewes, J. E. & Sedlak, D. L. A changing framework for urban water systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 10721–10726 (2013).
Leigh, N. G. & Lee, H. Sustainable and resilient urban water systems: the role of decentralization and planning. Sustainability 11, 918 (2019).
Critical Infrastructure Resilience: Final Report and Recommendations (National Infrastructure Advisory Council, 2009).
Holling, C. S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 1–23 (1973).
Hwang, H., Forrester, A. & Lansey, K. Decentralized water reuse: regional water supply system resilience benefits. Procedia Eng. 70, 853–856 (2014).
Piratla, K. R. & Goverdhanam, S. Decentralized water systems for sustainable and reliable supply. Procedia Eng. 118, 720–726 (2015).
Rabaey, K., Vandekerckhove, T., de Walle, A., Van & Sedlak, D. L. The third route: using extreme decentralization to create resilient urban water systems. Water Res. 185, 116276 (2020).
Mugume, S. N. et al. Enhancing resilience in urban water systems for future cities. Water Supply 15, 1343–1352 (2015).
Makropoulos, C. et al. A resilience assessment method for urban water systems. Urban Water J. 15, 316–328 (2018).
Water Right 5827 (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 2011).
Klise, K. A. et al. Water Network Tool for Resilience (WNTR) User Manual (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2017).
Wilbanks, T. J. & Fernandez, S. Climate Change and Infrastructure, Urban Systems, and Vulnerabilities: Technical Report for the U.S. Department of Energy in Support of the National Climate Assessment (Island Press, 2014).
Eto, J. H., LaCommare, K. H., Larsen, P. H., Todd, A. & Fisher, E. An Examination of Temporal Trends in Electricity Reliability Based on Reports from U.S. Electric Utilities (Berkeley Lab, 2012).
Gimelli, F. M., Bos, J. J. & Rogers, B. C. Fostering equity and wellbeing through water: a reinterpretation of the goal of securing access. World Dev. 104, 1–9 (2018).
Ženko, M. & Menga, F. Linking water scarcity to mental health: hydro–social interruptions in the Lake Urmia Basin, Iran. Water 11, 1092 (2019).
Drinking Water Standard for Arsenic (EPA, 2001); https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPdf.cgi?Dockey=20001XXC.txt
Sweetapple, C., Fu, G., Farmani, R. & Butler, D. General resilience: conceptual formulation and quantitative assessment for intervention development in the urban wastewater system. Water Res. 211, 118108 (2022).
Water Reuse: Potential for Expanding the Nation’s Water Supply Through Reuse of Municipal Wastewater 1–8 (National Academies Press, 2012).
Water Reuse: Potential for Expanding the Nation’s Water Supply Through Reuse of Municipal Wastewater 193–202 (National Academies Press, 2012).
Harris-Lovett, S. R., Binz, C., Sedlak, D. L., Kiparsky, M. & Truffer, B. Beyond user acceptance: a legitimacy framework for potable water reuse in California. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 7552–7561 (2015).
Morris, J. C., Georgiou, I., Guenther, E. & Caucci, S. Barriers in implementation of wastewater reuse: identifying the way forward in closing the loop. Circ. Econ. Sustain. 1, 413–433 (2021).
Drinking Water Operations (Houston Public Works, 2023).
US City Populations 2018 (World Population Review, 2018); http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/
Schuetz, R. A. Texas leads country in disasters. Houston Chronicle (18 April 2019).
Palin, P. J., Hanson, L. S., Barton, D. & Frohwein, A. Supply Chain Resilience and the 2017 Hurricane Season (CNA, 2018).
EPANET—Application for Modeling Drinking Water Distribution Systems (EPA, 2023); https://www.epa.gov/water-research/epanet
Walski, T. M. et al. Advanced Water Distribution Modeling and Management (Haestad Press, 2003).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge funding from the National Science Foundation (award number CBET-1707117, Q.L., L.D.-O. and L.S.) and NEWT: National Science Foundation (NSF) Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment (award number EEC-1449500, Q.L.). We thank P. Pradhan and F. Rabbi from Houston Public Works for providing some of the data used in this study. We also thank M. Bynum, D. Hart and K. Klise from the Sandia National Laboratories for providing technical support for WNTR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.L. conducted the research, analysed the results and wrote the manuscript with help from X.Z., who supported the backbone network development. L.D.-O., L.S. and Q.L. provided supervision and significant critical intellectual input. All authors planned the study, designed the research and contributed to the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Water thanks Sonja Bauer, David Butler and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary text, figures and tables.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, L., Zhou, X., Dueñas-Osorio, L. et al. Hybrid wastewater treatment and reuse enhances urban water system resilience to disruptive incidents. Nat Water 1, 1048–1058 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-023-00166-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-023-00166-6
This article is cited by
-
Increasing resilience with wastewater reuse
Nature Water (2023)