TABLE 1
FROM:
Top-down systems biology integration of conditional prebiotic modulated transgenomic interactions in a humanized microbiome mouse model
Francois-Pierre J Martin, Yulan Wang, Norbert Sprenger, Ivan K S Yap, Serge Rezzi, Ziad Ramadan, Emma Peré-Trepat, Florence Rochat, Christine Cherbut, Peter van Bladeren, Laurent B Fay, Sunil Kochhar, John C Lindon, Elaine Holmes & Jeremy K Nicholson
doi:10.1038/msb.2008.40
BACK TO ARTICLETable 1: Microbial species counts in mouse fecal and jejunal contents
| Groups/log10 CFU | HBM (n=10) | HBM+ L. paracasei (n=9) | HBM+ L. paracasei +Pre1 (n=9) | HBM+ L. paracasei+ Pre2 (n=9) | HBM+ L. rhamnosus (n=9) | HBM+ L. rhamnosus +Pre1 (n=10) | HBM+ L. rhamnosus +Pre2 (n=9) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Key: Log10 CFU (colony forming unit) given per gram of wet weight of feces or wet weight of jejunal content. Data are presented as mean | |||||||
| Feses | |||||||
| L. paracasei | — | 8.5 0.2 | 8.3 0.3* | 8.1 0.4** | — | — | — |
| L. rhamnosus | — | — | — | — | 7.8 0.2 | 7.6 0.4 | 7.9 0.3 |
| E. coli | 9.2 0.3 | 9.4 0.3 | 9.7 0.3 | 9.3 0.2 | 9.8 0.5 | 9.3 0.2* | 9.3 0.2* |
| B. breve | 9.1 0.2 | 7.78 2.13 | 8.5 1.5 | 8.7 1.5 | 8.7 0.3 | 9.8 0.3** | 10.0 0.4*** |
| B. longum | 8.2 0.6 | 5.6 1.9 | 6.2 1.6 | 6.7 1.8 | 6.3 0.5 | 7.7 1.2** | 9.3 1.04*** |
| S. aureus | 7.4 0.3 | 6.3 0.3 | 6.3 0.5 | 6.1 0.7 | 6.6 0.5 | 6.1 0.4 | 6.4 0.9 |
| S. epidermidis | 4.8 0.4 | 4.9 1.2 | 4.5 0.9 | 3.8 0.4 | 4.0 0.5 | 3.7 0.7 | 6.0 1.5 |
| C. perfringens | 7.2 0.3 | 7.0 0.5 | 6.5 1.0 | 5.9 0.6** | 5.7 1.0 | 6.6 1.1 | <5.0 |
| Bacteroides distasonis | 10.3 0.2 | 10.4 0.2 | 10.1 0.6 | 10.1 0.4 | 10.1 0.4 | 10.2 0.3 | 10.3 0.3 |
| Jejunum | |||||||
| L. paracasei | — | 4.2 1.8 | 2.9 0.8 | 2.6 0.9* | — | — | — |
| L. rhamnosus | — | — | — | — | 3.6 1.3 | 3.1 1.3 | 3.0 0.8 |
| E. coli | 3.3 1.3 | 5.1 1.9 | 4.0 0.8 | 3.7 1.2 | 5.2 1.9 | 4.2 1.3 | 4.4 0.8 |
| B. breve | 2.7 1.4 | 2.5 1.0 | 2.7 1.3 | 3.0 1.4 | 2.4 0.8 | 4.0 1.6** | 4.0 0.9** |
| B. longum | <2.0 | <2.0 | <2.0 | <2.0 | <2.0 | <2.0 | <2.0 |
| S. aureus | 4.1 0.9 | 3.8 1.3 | 4.1 0.9 | 3.7 0.7 | 4.2 0.7 | 3.0 1.3* | 4.0 0.5 |
| S. epidermidis | <3.0 | <3.0 | <3.0 | <3.0 | <3.0 | <3.0 | <3.0 |
| C. perfringens | 3.4 1.1 | 4.5 1.2 | 3.4 0.7 | 2.9 1.1 | 4.7 1.3 | 3.4 1.0* | 3.2 0.5* |
| Bacteroides distasonis | 3.4 1.6 | 4.8 1.6 | 3.2 1.2* | 3.3 0.9* | 3.8 1.7 | 4.0 1.3 | 4.1 1.3 |

s.d. The average values obtained from the HBM+probiotics mice supplemented with prebiotics were compared with corresponding HBM+probiotics control mice, *, ** and *** designate significant difference at 95, 99 and 99.9% confidence level, respectively; —, probiotics not present in the gut microbiota.