Synopsis

Subject Categories: Metabolic and regulatory networks | Microbiology & Pathogens

Molecular Systems Biology 4 Article number: 205  doi:10.1038/msb.2008.40
Published online: 15 July 2008
Citation: Molecular Systems Biology 4:205

Top-down systems biology integration of conditional prebiotic modulated transgenomic interactions in a humanized microbiome mouse model

Francois-Pierre J Martin1,2, Yulan Wang1, Norbert Sprenger2, Ivan K S Yap1, Serge Rezzi2, Ziad Ramadan2, Emma Peré-Trepat2, Florence Rochat2, Christine Cherbut2, Peter van Bladeren2, Laurent B Fay2, Sunil Kochhar2, John C Lindon1, Elaine Holmes1 & Jeremy K Nicholson1

  1. Division of Surgery, Oncology, Reproductive Biology and Anaesthetics, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
  2. Nestlé Research Center, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, Lausanne, Switzerland

Correspondence to: Francois-Pierre J Martin1,2 Nestlé Research Center, Vers-chez-les-Blanc, CH-1000 Lausanne 26, Switzerland. Tel.: + 41 21 785 8771; Fax: +41 21 785 9486; Email: francois-pierre.martin@rdls.nestle.com

Correspondence to: Jeremy K Nicholson1 Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK. Tel.: +44 20 7594 3195; Fax: +44 20 7594 3226; Email: j.nicholson@imperial.ac.uk

Received 1 February 2008; Accepted 21 May 2008; Published online 15 July 2008

Top

Article highlights

  • Integrative systemic metabolic and microbiome profiling demonstrated the importance of nutritional intervention based on prebiotics combinations in determining the symbiotic microbiome-mammalian metabolic status and the levels of a diverse range of compounds in multiple pathways.
  • The consumption of galactosyl-ologosaccharides induced specific differences in the gut microbial functional ecology and modified the gut microbial activities towards carbohydrate metabolism, resulting in different energy recovery from the diet.
  • The changes resulted in different system energy and lipid metabolism, as observed via changes of lipid homeostasis, gluconeogenesis, amino acid and methylamine metabolism associated to different bacterial fermentation of carbohydrates.
  • Our data highlight that digestion of dietary carbohydrates by gut microbial species as a key factor in determining the resulting host metabolic phenotypes and use of prebiotics are highly promising to address personalized nutrition.

Top

Synopsis

Adult humans carry ca. 1.5 kg of gut microbial symbiotic and commensal organisms that are in intimate communication with the host metabolic and immune systems (Nicholson et al, 2005; Dethlefsen et al, 2007). This symbiosis is the result of a long period of co-evolution and co-adaptation between the host genotype and the complex and variable microbiome (Gill et al, 2006). The effects of consuming live microbial supplements (probiotics) on the microbial ecology, and on human health and nutritional status have been investigated extensively over many years (Collins and Gibson, 1999; Rastall, 2005; Sonnenburg et al, 2006; Martin et al, 2007b). In addition, there is now considerable evidence that manipulation of the gut microbiota by prebiotics can beneficially influence the health of the host (Gibson and Roberfroid, 1995; Roberfroid, 1998; Delzenne and Kok, 2001; Sartor, 2004; Lim et al, 2005; Rastall, 2005; Parracho et al, 2007). For example, oligosaccharides have been suggested to represent the most important prebiotic dietary factor in human milk, promoting the development of a beneficial intestinal microbiota (Kunz et al, 2000; Bode, 2006).

Nowadays, clinical trials support the claims of efficacy of pro- and prebiotic nutritional intervention with regard to various proposed beneficial health effects, which has raised the requirement for providing additional evidence and for elucidation of the molecular bases of their action. This can be captured effectively only by studying the global system response of an organism to an intervention using top-down systems biology approaches. Recently, we have described that germ-free mice re-inoculated with a model of human baby microbiota (HBM mice) offer a simplified microbiome mouse model well adapted to assess the impact of nutritional intervention on gut microbial functional ecosystem and subsequent effects on host metabolism (Martin et al, 2008). The aim of the present study is to extend our previous investigations and to compare the effects of consumption of a synthetic galactosyl-oligosaccharide (Pre1) with those due to consumption of an in-house preparation of galactosyl-oligosaccharides (Pre2). We have assessed the impact of prebiotics on the microbial balance and the mammalian metabolism of HBM mice supplemented with a probiotic, Lactobacillus paracasei or L. rhamnosus (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 :  Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Schematic diagram of the experimental study design.

Full figure and legend (198K)Figures & Tables index

Here, we show specific effects of two prebiotics on the microbial populations of HBM mice when co-administered with two probiotics. These microbial changes were associated with specific host metabolic phenotypes, for example, variations in the fecal carbohydrate content, reduction in the level of hepatic triglyceride content and increased hepatic concentrations of PUFAs and hepatic glucogenic amino acids. These data provide further evidence for the critical involvement of prebiotics in host metabolism through modulation of the gut microbiome.

Our data provide additional evidence that the populations of beneficial bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract can, to some extent, be controlled with dietary interventions, here based on supplementation with galactosyl-oligosaccharides. Here, increases in the fecal populations of beneficial bacteria, namely Bifidobacterium longum and B. breve (Table I), were specifically associated with supplementation of prebiotics, Pre2 offering a greater ability to modulate the gut microbiota in HBM mice compared with Pre1. Carbohydrate fermentation may result in inhibition of the growth of pathogens by acidification of the environment through production of large quantities of carboxylic acids (Kikuchi et al, 1992; Ito et al, 1993; Rowland, 1993; Gibson and Roberfroid, 1995; Djouzi and Andrieux, 1997), which may explain the observation of a greater reduction in Escherichia coli and Clostridium perfringens bacterial counts in the feces (Table I).


Interestingly, in HBM mice supplemented with L. paracasei, populations of lactobacilli were slightly reduced with both prebiotic supplementations, and bifidobacteria showed only upward trends, which suggested a competition for the prebiotics between bifidobacteria and L. paracasei. Moreover, the observation of higher fecal content of oligosaccharides O1 and O3 specific to HBM mice fed with prebiotics and L. paracasei indicated that the microbiota may use these substrates poorly when compared with other groups.

Furthermore, ingestion of galacto-oligosaccharides or fructo-oligosaccharides is known to specifically induce bacterial hydrolysis of the substrate (Djouzi and Andrieux, 1997), as well as to modulate some bacterial activities, including glycolytic properties, hydrolysis of oligosaccharides, and formation of phenols and indoles (Mitsuoka et al, 1987; Ito et al, 1993; Rowland, 1993). In the current study, investigation of the metabolite changes in urinary excretion suggests that prebiotics intervention may reduce proteolytic activities previously ascribed to the basal metabolism of L. paracasei on casein medium (Martin et al, 2008), which is in agreement with reduced number of these bacteria observed in this study.

In parallel to gut microbial changes, relative reduction of hepatic triglycerides and increased concentrations of PUFAs were observed with mice supplemented with prebiotics. Non-digestible but fermentable carbohydrates were reported to decrease triglycerides in both serum and liver via modulation of the activity and gene expression of the lipogenic enzymes (Delzenne and Kok, 1998, 2001; Roberfroid and Delzenne, 1998; Pereira and Gibson, 2002). Moreover, fructans-type feeding may reduce the ability of isolated hepatocytes to synthesize and secrete triglycerides by 54% (Kok et al, 1996), as well as their ability to esterify fatty acids into triacylglycerols (Fiordaliso et al, 1995), which suggest a similar mechanism with galactosyl-oligosaccharides that may explain the relative increase in the NMR signals of PUFA-containing phospholipids in the current study. PUFAs can act by directing fatty acids away from triglyceride storage and toward oxidation, and can also enhance glucose flux to glycogen (Kliewer et al, 1997).

Notably, animals fed with L. paracasei in combination with prebiotics showed the most significant hepatic reduction in triglycerides, which was associated with a high fecal content of oligosaccharides. Previous studies showed that some prebiotics induce changes in lipogenic enzyme activities by reducing postprandial insulinemia and glycemia (Kok et al, 1998; Delzenne and Kok, 2001), via stimulation of the intestinal release of hormonal mediators (Morgan, 1996), or modification of the intestinal absorption of carbohydrates (Stanley and Newsholme, 1985) and shortening small intestinal transit time (Roberfroid and Delzenne, 1998). Our results suggest that a similar mechanism may be involved in mice supplemented with prebiotics co-administered with L. paracasei, as the higher concentrations of fecal oligosaccharides may reflect poorer digestion and absorption resulting in lower energy generation from carbohydrates, with a consequent switch to fat metabolism. However, further work is needed to understand the functional link between the residual fecal carbohydrate and the digestion of prebiotics by the gut microbiota, for instance by assessing experimentally the metabolic abilities of the bacterial species to utilize the prebiotics in future studies.

In conclusion, integrative systemic metabolic and microbiome profiling demonstrated the importance of nutritional intervention based on prebiotics and probiotic combinations in determining the host metabolic status and the levels of a diverse range of compounds in multiple pathways. Our data highlight that digestion of dietary carbohydrates by gut microbial species is a key factor in determining the resulting host metabolic phenotypes and use of prebiotics is highly promising to address personalized nutrition. The perspective of inducing unique changes in the host metabolism triggered by unique combinations of prebiotics and probiotics establishes an important step forward in the efforts to develop tailored nutritional solutions at an individual level.

Top

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the help and input of Ivan Montoliu Roura, Olivier Cloarec and Marc-Emmanuel Dumas for statistical analysis; Isabelle Rochat, Catherine Murset and Gloria Reuteler for microbial analysis; and Rodrigo Bibiloni and Enea Rezzonico for helpful discussions on gut bacterial metabolism. We thank John Newell, Monique Julita, Massimo Marchesini, Catherine Schwartz and Christophe Maubert for provision of the animal facilities and expertise. This work received financial support from Nestlé (to F-PJM, YW) and from the International Study of Macro/micronutrient and Blood Pressure grant 1-R01-HL084228-01A1 (to IKSY).

Top

References

  1. Bode L (2006) Recent advances on structure, metabolism, and function of human milk oligosaccharides. J Nutr 136: 2127–2130 | PubMed | ChemPort |
  2. Collins MD, Gibson GR (1999) Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: approaches for modulating the microbial ecology of the gut. Am J Clin Nutr 69: 1052S–1057S | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  3. Delzenne NM, Kok N (1998) Effect of non-digestible fermentable carbohydrates on hepatic fatty acid metabolism. Biochem Soc Trans 26: 228–230 | PubMed | ChemPort |
  4. Delzenne NM, Kok N (2001) Effects of fructans-type prebiotics on lipid metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr 73: 456S–458S | PubMed | ChemPort |
  5. Dethlefsen L, Fall-Ngai M, Relman DA (2007) An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human–microbe mutualism and disease. Nature 449: 811–818 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  6. Djouzi Z, Andrieux C (1997) Compared effects of three oligosaccharides on metabolism of intestinal microflora in rats inoculated with a human faecal flora. Br J Nutr 78: 313–324 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  7. Ellis DI, Dunn WB, Griffin JL, Allwood JW, Goodacre R (2007) Metabolic fingerprinting as a diagnostic tool. Pharmacogenomics 8: 1243–1266 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  8. Fiordaliso M, Kok N, Desager JP, Goethals F, Deboyser D, Roberfroid M, Delzenne N (1995) Dietary oligofructose lowers triglycerides, phospholipids and cholesterol in serum and very low density lipoproteins of rats. Lipids 30: 163–167 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  9. Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB (1995) Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J Nutr 125: 1401–1412 | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  10. Houten SM, Watanabe M, Auwerx J (2006) Endocrine functions of bile acids. EMBO J 25: 1419–1425 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  11. Katsurada A, Iritani N, Fukuda H, Matsumura Y, Nishimoto N, Noguchi T, Tanaka T (1990) Effects of nutrients and hormones on transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of fatty acid synthase in rat liver. Eur J Biochem 190: 427–433 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  12. Kikuchi H, Andrieux C, Szylit O (1992) Effects of galacto-oligosaccharides on bacterial enzymatic activities and metabolite production in rats associated with a human flora. Proc Nutr Soc 51: 7A | Article |
  13. Kliewer SA, Sundseth SS, Jones SA, Brown PJ, Wisely GB, Koble CS, Devchand P, Wahli W, Willson TM, Lenhard JM, Lehmann JM (1997) Fatty acids and eicosanoids regulate gene expression through direct interactions with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 4318–4323 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  14. Kok N, Roberfroid M, Robert A, Delzenne N (1996) Involvement of lipogenesis in the lower VLDL secretion induced by oligofructose in rats. Br J Nutr 76: 881–890 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  15. Kok NN, Taper HS, Delzenne NM (1998) Oligofructose modulates lipid metabolism alterations induced by a fat-rich diet in rats. J Appl Toxicol 18: 47–53 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  16. Ley R, Turnbaugh P, Klein S, Gordon J (2006) Human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 444: 1023–1024 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  17. Martin FP, Verdu EF, Wang Y, Dumas ME, Yap IK, Cloarec O, Bergonzelli GE, Corthesy-Theulaz I, Kochhar S, Holmes E, Lindon JC, Collins SM, Nicholson JK (2006) Transgenomic metabolic interactions in a mouse disease model: interactions of Trichinella spiralis infection with dietary Lactobacillus paracasei supplementation. J Proteome Res 5: 2185–2193 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  18. Martin FP, Wang Y, Sprenger N, Holmes E, Lindon JC, Kochhar S, Nicholson JK (2007b) Effects of probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei treatment on the host gut tissue metabolic profiles probed via magic-angle-spinning NMR spectroscopy. J Proteome Res 6: 1471–1481 | Article | ChemPort |
  19. Metges CC (2000) Contribution of microbial amino acids to amino acid homeostasis of the host. J Nutr 130: 1857S–1864S | PubMed | ChemPort |
  20. Mitsuoka T, Hidaka H, Eida T (1987) Effect of fructo-oligosaccharides on intestinal microflora. Nahrung 31: 427–436 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  21. Nagayama K (1980) Experimental techniques of two-dimensional correlated spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 40: 321–334 | ISI | ChemPort |
  22. Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Wilson ID (2005) Gut microorganisms, mammalian metabolism and personalized health care. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 431–438 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  23. Parracho H, McCartney AL, Gibson GR (2007) Probiotics and prebiotics in infant nutrition. Proc Nutr Soc 66: 405–411 | Article | PubMed |
  24. Pereira DI, Gibson GR (2002) Effects of consumption of probiotics and prebiotics on serum lipid levels in humans. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 37: 259–281 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  25. Rezzi S, Ramadan Z, Martin FP, Fay LB, van Bladeren P, Lindon JC, Nicholson JK, Kochhar S (2007) Human metabolic phenotypes link directly to specific dietary preferences in healthy individuals. J Proteome Res 6: 4469–4477 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  26. Roberfroid MB (1998) Prebiotics and synbiotics: concepts and nutritional properties. Br J Nutr 80: S197–S202 | PubMed | ChemPort |
  27. Roberfroid MB, Delzenne NM (1998) Dietary fructans. Annu Rev Nutr 18: 117–143 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  28. Rycroft CE, Jones MR, Gibson GR, Rastall RA (2001) A comparative in vitro evaluation of the fermentation properties of prebiotic oligosaccharides. J Appl Microbiol 91: 878–887 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  29. Smith JL, Wishnok JS, Deen WM (1994) Metabolism and excretion of methylamines in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 125: 296–308 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
  30. Sonnenburg JL, Chen CT, Gordon JI (2006) Genomic and metabolic studies of the impact of probiotics on a model gut symbiont and host. PLoS Biol 4: e413 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

NEWS AND VIEWS

Human and microbe: united we stand

Nature Medicine News and Views (01 Jul 2006)

Extra navigation

.
ADVERTISEMENT