Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 452, 28 (6 March 2008) | doi:10.1038/452028a; Published online 5 March 2008
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Efficient Chromosome Doubling: Plant Cell Division
The Seeker is looking for an efficient chromosome doubling method in plants and in particular, metho...
-
Protect Enzyme from In Planta Degradation
A proposal for stable expression of an enzyme in corn seed is desired.
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Postdoctoral Research Fellow ? Andy Chan?s Lab / Immunology
- Genentech
- South San Francisco, CA, USA
Director of Bioinformatics
- University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
- Johannesburg, South Africa
Who stands to lose from double-blind review?
Boyan K. Garvalov1
- Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
Why do journals expect scientists to use double-blind methods in their research, but refuse to apply a double-blind approach in evaluating that same research? The Editorial 'Working double-blind'(Nature 451, 605–606; doi:10.1038/451605b 2008
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Circumventing tolerance to a human MDM2-derived tumor antigen by TCR gene transferNature Immunology Article (01 Oct 2001)
Genetic basis of salt-susceptibility in the Sabra rat model of hypertensionKidney International Original Article
Double-blind review: easy to guess in specialist fieldsNature Correspondence (06 Mar 2008)
Double-blind review: let diversity reignNature Correspondence (06 Mar 2008)
See all 5 matches for Research