Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 452, 28 (6 March 2008) | doi:10.1038/452028b; Published online 5 March 2008
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Methods of Modeling Adaptation in Populations
The analysis of adaptation with a population is a frequently encountered computational modeling scen...
-
Novel Approaches to Protecting Maize from Insect Damage
The Seeker is looking for novel approaches to protecting maize from insect damage. This Challenge re...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
Postdoctoral Research Fellows
- Northwestern University
- Chicago, Illinois, United States
Tenure-Stream Position in Oral Microbiology
- University of Toronto
- Toronto, ON Canada
Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway
K. Razi Naqvi1
- Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
In your Editorial 'Working double-blind' (Nature 451, 605–606; doi:10.1038/451605b 2008), you suggest that authors may be vulnerable to bias if referees guess their identities — for example, bias about their previous work, their gender, their nationality or their being new to a field.
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
RBMY evolved on the Y chromosome from a ubiquitously transcribed X-Y identical geneNature Genetics Correspondence (01 Jul 1999)
Expert assessment of exposure to carcinogens in Norway's offshore petroleum industryJournal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology Article Response
