Access
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Correspondence
Nature 452, 28 (6 March 2008) | doi:10.1038/452028d; Published online 5 March 2008
Open Innovation Challenges
-
Direct Molecular Detection of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to protein and nucleic acid detection. This is an Id...
-
Single-cell Analysis Platform
This Challenge is looking for novel approaches to analyzing changes at a single-cell level. This is...
- More Challenges
- Powered by:
nature jobs
New Business Manager
- ResMed
- Abingdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
Junior Research Groups (W1 / W2)
- Cluster of Excellence "Multimodal Computing and Interaction"
- Saarbruecken Germany
Double-blind review: let diversity reign
Bob O'Hara1
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, PO Box 68 (Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2b), FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
The aim of blinding in peer-review is to improve the quality of reviews by removing any bias that might arise from knowing the identity of the authors. As your Editorial 'Working double-blind' (Nature 451, 605–606; doi:10.1038/451605b 2008
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.
RESEARCH
Why negatives should be viewed as positivesNature Correspondence (16 Feb 2006)
European grants: a different view puts rich countries aheadNature Correspondence (18 Sep 2008)
High-level similarity of dentitions in carnivorans and rodentsNature Letters to Editor (04 Jan 2007)
