Access

Correspondence

Nature 452, 28 (6 March 2008) | doi:10.1038/452028b; Published online 5 March 2008

naturejobs

More science jobs
Post a job for free

Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway

K. Razi Naqvi1

  1. Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway

In your Editorial 'Working double-blind' (Nature 451, 605–606; doi:10.1038/451605b 2008), you suggest that authors may be vulnerable to bias if referees guess their identities — for example, bias about their previous work, their gender, their nationality or their being new to a field.

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated.

RESEARCH

Evidence that bone morphogenetic protein 4 has multiple biological functions during kidney and urinary tract development

Kidney International Original Article