Access
This article is part of Nature's premium content.
Please note this is News in Brief, and so will be a short article.
Published online 25 June 2008 | Nature 453, 1156 (2008) | doi:10.1038/4531156f
News in Brief
Radar and wind farms should coexist, say advisers
To read this story in full you will need to login or make a payment (see right).
Please note this is News in Brief, and so will be a short article.
Comments
Reader comments are usually moderated after posting. If you find something offensive or inappropriate, you can speed this process by clicking 'Report this comment' (or, if that doesn't work for you, email redesign@nature.com). For more controversial topics, we reserve the right to moderate before comments are published.
Projects like CASA (http://www.casa.umass.edu/) will likely lead the way in this. The venerable WSR-88D is currently on the road to replacement with phased-array antenna systems and dual-doppler dual polarization schemes that promise to provide significantly better data for sensing hydrometeors. The inherent problem here, though, is that modern weather radars are designed to look at the relative motion and doppler signature of a target. Wind turbine blades move. The velocity signature imparted to a reflected signal will tell the radar that. Some degree of electronic masking and desensitization will be possible in radar software updates, much as we see terrain masking now, but masking doppler signatures is problemmatical in that you could well lose sensitivity throughout the entire scan range of the radar station, and not just at the windfarm. Adaptive sensors as proposed by CASA show promise in that they could be local enough (cellularized) to restrict doppler interference solely to that region while retaining their resolution and sensitivity throughout the rest of the sensor region of interest.