Abstract
Neuron interface devices can be used to explore the relationships between neuron firing and synaptic transmission, as well as to diagnose and treat neurological disorders, such as epilepsy and Alzheimer’s disease. It is crucial to exploit neuron devices with high sensitivity, high biocompatibility, multifunctional integration and high-speed data processing. During the past decades, researchers have made significant progress in neural electrodes, artificial sensory neuron devices, and neuromorphic optic neuron devices. The main part of the review is divided into two sections, providing an overview of recently developed neuron interface devices for recording electrophysiological signals, as well as applications in neuromodulation, simulating the human sensory system, and achieving memory and recognition. We mainly discussed the development, characteristics, functional mechanisms, and applications of neuron devices and elucidated several key points for clinical translation. The present review highlights the advances in neuron devices on brain-computer interfaces and neuroscience research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The nervous system has outstanding cognitive capabilities with 100 billion neurons, and the interrelationships among different types of neurons are extremely complex and precise1. A disorder of the nervous system poses a serious threat to human health; thus, developing high-level technologies and devices is very important for exploring brain function and understanding neuropathological progression; therefore, it has attracted great interest in the scientific community2,3,4,5,6,7,8. Correspondingly, neuron devices could improve the comprehension of neural networks and promote the diagnosis and treatment of nervous system diseases.
The development process of neuron devices is shown in Fig. 1. After the first discovery of electroencephalography (EEG) signals in the 1920s, neural electrodes and a variety of different signal detection technologies were gradually developed9,10,11,12,13. The Turing test sparked a wave of artificial intelligence in the 1950s, and researchers became increasingly interested in computer learning, gradually developing related technologies, such as deep learning and big data computing14. In the context of the continuous development of neuroscience and AI, brain-computer interface (BCI) technology was proposed in the 1970s15. To date, the cross-integration technology of artificial intelligence (AI) technology and brain science has boosted the development of neuron devices and neuroscience16,17,18. The BCI is currently in the stage of technological explosion, providing new neurorehabilitation methods and enabling disabled persons to control the external world by decoding the EEG signals obtained from neuron devices15,19,20. Furthermore, emerging neuron devices for simulating biological sensory neurons were invented to substitute disabled sense organs21,22,23,24,25,26. With the development of ‘big data’ technology, computer learning technologies based on neural networks have emerged and have shown great power to facilitate the development of neuron devices. Neuromorphic hardware and software systems simulating the plasticity of neurons and synapses can achieve memory and recognition27,28. However, some challenges, such as a low signal-to-noise ratio, immune response in neural tissue, unitary function and limited data processing capabilities13,29,30,31,32,33, have impeded the clinical translation of neuron devices. Therefore, it is of great significance to develop multifunctional neuron devices with high sensitivity, good biocompatibility and fast processing for the diagnosis and treatment of nervous system diseases.
In this review, we summarized representative neuron devices and their fabrication, properties, and biocompatibility; in addition, we highlighted their advances in biomedical applications. We analyzed the existing problems and challenges and elucidated future research directions, especially designing neuron devices combined with AI technology. First, we summarized the neuron interface devices that can sensitively monitor neuron firing signals in intracellular and extracellular space and in optical imaging. Second, we discussed the applications of neuron devices currently in development, including neuromodulation in neurological disorders, “sensory substitution” in motor prostheses, and memory and recognition in AI. We mainly discussed the development, characteristics, functional mechanisms, and application of neuron devices and elucidated several key points regarding clinical translation.
Classification for neuron interface devices
High-quality neural signal recording requires sensitive signal acquisition devices, which can be combined with signal decoding to achieve self-feedback stimulation or control of the external world. The original intracellular neuron recording device was the patch-clamp technique, developed in the 1970s34, which detected synaptic transmission by manipulating high-temporal resolution electrical impulses on an individual neuron and was the gold standard for studying the properties of ion channels35,36. Afterward, integrated microelectrode arrays (MEAs) were developed to record large-scale neural activity to study communication between neuronal populations30,37,38,39,40.
However, foreign-body responses and inflammatory reactions can lead to the loss of neural signals in the electrode-nerve interface; thus, it is necessary to improve the biocompatibility of electrodes13,30,41. Other emerging neuron signal technologies, such as optogenetic modulation of neural activity, use optical stimulation, and imaging techniques with fluorescent indicators or genetically encoded molecular probes to enable large-scale recordings of neural activity42,43. In this section, we review the method of recording signals for neuron interface devices.
Neuron interface devices for intracellular recordings
Intracellular recording remains the best technique for capturing single-neuron electrical properties that contain crucial information regarding membrane ion-channel activities, receptor channel interactions, etc. The patch-clamp technique, which establishes direct contact with the intracellular environment through the penetration of a glass micropipette (Fig. 2a)44,45,46, is the most sensitive approach to investigating neural excitability. Thomas et al. investigated the propagation of axosomatic action potentials (APs) and postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) transmitted to the basal tree with the patch-clamp technique, demonstrating that EPSPs are of prime importance to neuronal output (Fig. 2b)47. Kanako et al. used the patch-clamp technique to study firing patterns of dopamine neurons by recording the subthreshold potentials in vivo48. Nevertheless, this approach is restricted to single cells or channels and requires a high technical capability to perform. An automated patch clamp has the advantages of high throughput, ease of operation, and parallel detection of numerous cells49. Suhasa et al. developed a robot that automatically performed patch clamping and lowered its micropipettes until a cell was detected (Fig. 2c). Automated intracellular recording has the characteristics of good yield, throughput and quality50.
However, the patch-clamp technique is invasive and not suited for parallel execution of high-sensitivity intracellular recording for tens of minutes. Recently, emerging nanofabrication techniques have realized a large number of neuron intracellular recordings by developing nanoscale devices. A nanowire electrode array (VNEA) was developed, which can intracellularly record and stimulate cultured rat cortical neurons, demonstrating biocompatibility and biosafety (Fig. 2d–f)51. However, this kind of intracellular interface is significantly limited compared to that of the patch clamp and is inapplicable to neural networks. Electrical signal transmission between neural networks is precise and complex, and scalable and high-fidelity recording of intracellular signals from a large number of neurons is needed. A scalable recording composed of thousands of platinum-black electrodes, which can record intracellular electrical signals by stimulating a high-density neuron neuroelectronic interface (CNEI; Fig. 2g), was reported52. The CNEI simulated the working mechanism of the patch clamp setup and can operate in either pseudocurrent-clamp (pCC) mode or pseudovoltage-clamp (pVC) mode; this approach can be used to record membrane potential and ion channel currents by switching the two stimulation modes (Fig. 2h). Extracellular recordings of neurons were converted to intracellular measurements when given corresponding electrical stimulation (Fig. 2i). These results demonstrated that CNEI can be used to effectively perform the intracellular recording of single neuron firing and control neuronal spontaneous firing, which is important in neurological disorders caused by the high-frequency firing of spontaneous neurons53,54.
Neuron interface devices for extracellular recordings
Extracellular recording techniques are good for identifying high-frequency APs from single units and low-frequency local field potentials (LFPs) from groups of neurons55. The traditional Utah array can extend the sampling volume laterally (Fig. 3a), but such rigid probes can cause intrinsic tissue damage56. The electrode size was later reduced to be closer to that of the neuronal soma in the NeuroGrid array, which was an electrocorticography (ECoG) array. Recent advances in silicon Neuropixels probes have enabled large-scale neural recordings (Fig. 3b)57. The corresponding APs and average LFP were collected in the human cortex, suggesting that a Neuropixels probe could be adapted in acute recordings with high spatial sampling and high-quality spike sorting (Fig. 3c)57. To address the problem of the large difference between the bending stiffness of the neural probe and the Young’s modulus of neural tissue, mesh electronics, which achieved long-term recording of ~4 months (Fig. 3d, e)58, were designed. The biocompatibility of the electronic mesh was determined by exploring the number of astrocytes and microglia, which were naturally distributed around the electronic mesh, revealing less inflammation and steady periodic spike amplitudes.
Multifunctional neural probes integrated with diverse stimulation modalities, such as electrical, optical, and chemical stimulation, are becoming essential tools in neuroscience. Multifunctional probes with a microfluidic channel can deliver different neuroactive biochemicals and simultaneously monitor single-unit activities (Fig. 3f)59. In addition, the detection of electrophysiology combined with neurotransmitters, such as dopamine (DA), is expected to be a potential therapy for treating neurodegenerative diseases (Fig. 3g)60. Four representative channels of multifunctional MEA could be used to record electrical activities from mature dopaminergic neurons cultured on the surface of MEA (Fig. 3h). Fluorescence images showed that dopaminergic neurons cultured on MEA could highly express specific markers of mature dopaminergic neurons, demonstrating high biocompatibility and biosafety (Fig. 3i)60.
Neuron interface devices for optical imaging recordings
Optical imaging and fluorescent probes provide powerful tools for the real-time detection of ion dynamics, which makes use of light as a sensor, providing high spatial resolution and avoiding electrical wire connections to tissue61,62. Changes in the extracellular potassium ion (K+) concentration affected the emission of nanosensors, which significantly regulated the potential, excitability, and spikes of cell membranes63,64,65. Extracellular K+ diminished the current driving power created by the activated K+ channel, resulting in a longer action potential duration and continuous excitation of neurons66,67. Some sensors based on biological components, such as vesicles, use membrane channel proteins to specifically transport K+ to indicators68. Some modified nanoparticle sensors, such as upconversion nanoparticle sensors, can convert near-infrared light to ultraviolet light, which triggers the detection of K+ fluctuations61. In addition, a highly sensitive and selective K+ sensor was designed by integrating commercially available K+ indicators into mesoporous silica nanoparticles (Fig. 4a)69. The recordings of epileptic mice correlated with the fluorescence signals during seizures showed that K+ nanosensors can noninvasively monitor electrical activity in freely moving mice (Fig. 4b)69.
Moreover, calcium (Ca2+) indicators have good compatibility with fluorescence microscopy, and genetically encoded indicators with fluorescent proteins have increased brightness and sensing accuracy (Fig. 4c)70. For example, GCaMPs have been frequently employed in in vivo research to discuss behavior-induced activities (Fig. 4d)70,71. The temporal response of calcium indicators is much slower than that of action potentials, so the indirect measurements of action potentials by calcium peaks sometimes do not provide a clear interpretation of the data72. Furthermore, nanomaterials, such as nanoparticles (NPs) and nanocluster-based sensors, enable efficient development of robust imaging probes for quantitative ion detection73,74,75,76. Colloidal nanoparticles with biocompatibility, strong fluorescence, long emissive lifetimes, and excellent photostability make them advanced biological sensors (Fig. 4e)77. Atomic-precision gold nanoclusters were designed to monitor high-resolution imaging under excitation of the long wavelength in near-infrared II (Fig. 4f)32,75. A clear blood vessel on brain images showed gold clusters with ultrasmall hydrodynamic sizes, exhibiting better resolution, which may be useful for future neuroscience applications.
Applications of neuron devices
Neuromodulation
The modern era of neuromodulation began in the early 1960s and refers to electrical stimulation or chemical substances applied directly to the nervous system to modify nerve cell activity. The applications of therapeutic electrical stimulation are very diverse, and new applications are being developed. In recent years, with the development of artificial intelligence technology, brain-computer interface (BCI) technology holds great potential as a neuromodulation tool for helping patients with neuromotor dysfunction. Recently, a developed bidirectional BCI system was shown to control robotic prostheses in real time through signal monitoring of the implanted microelectrode array (Fig. 5a)78, which can evoke tactile sensations by stimulating the motor cortex and decoding neural recordings to control the prosthesis. In the future, systematic BCI technology also needs to be designed with a more complete stimulus encoding and decoding system, which will promote somatosensory recovery in patients with motor dysfunction.
Sensing and feedback are two functions of closed-loop regulation that can rapidly and consistently improve the treatment of neurological conditions79. Recent studies have shown that deep brain stimulation (DBS) combined with closed-loop strategies can treat Parkinson’s disease and other motor disorders80. Scangos et al. developed an approach to implement depression-specific biomarker-driven closed-loop therapy by implanting a chronic deep brain sensing and stimulation device (Fig. 5b)81. Such a device designed with multichannel recording, biomarker detection and microstimulation technologies was able to reduce the frequency of seizures with safety and good tolerance (Fig. 5c, d)81,82. In the future, there is a need for further development of the loop for DBS, which is wireless, compact, robust, and biocompatible. In addition, noninvasive neuromodulation, such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), can intervene with neurophysiological dynamics83. Grover et al.84 used high-frequency tACS to establish beta-gamma rhythms in reward learning for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (Fig. 5e). The underlying mechanism of OCD was verified, and the corresponding current-flow model of the cortical surface was reconstructed in three dimensions (Fig. 5f). These noninvasive techniques also include transcranial magnetic stimulation and focused ultrasound, which provides insight into brain physiology and is used to modify brain circuits for various therapeutic and neural enhancements.
Artificial sensory neuron devices
In biological perception systems, certain types of neurons and receptors, such as photoreceptors and mechanoreceptors, transform external environmental signals into electrical spikes (Fig. 6a)85,86,87,88,89,90,91. Artificial sensory neuron devices can mimic complicated sensing and processing functions in biological systems, which can convert external stimuli into electrical signals. Recently, emerging devices, such as memristors, have been used to emulate the functionalities of synapses and neurons. Yuan et al.91 reported a neuromorphic perception system that can monitor the curvatures of fingers by using the perception component VO2 (Fig. 6b). In addition, Bao et al. created an electronic pressure sensor with neuron-like devices using flexible degradable materials, which can move to monitor electrocardiogram and electromyogram signals92. Shun et al. reported an artificial haptic sensory system that can simulate fast adaptation and slow adaptation by stress and vibration and that can then output physiological signals21. In addition, an artificial intrinsic-synaptic tactile sensory organ (AiS-TSO) was developed, which mimicked synaptic connections and had sensory and memory functions93. The sensing mechanism was the influx of Ca2+ induced by Merkel cells under pressure (Fig. 6c)94, which realized the memory function of the synapse, and the order of touches can be deduced by the size of the pixel values of the device array (Fig. 6d, e). Therefore, the simulated tactile receptor with simple memory and recognition functions can flexibly control the reception and processing of tactile information.
Human perception of the external environment is extremely complex and depends on the fusion of multiple senses. The fusion and connection of multiple sensors enables the brain to perform cognition correctly95. For example, using innovative materials and technologies resulted in efficient and sensitive monitoring of sensory information, reaching the level of human receptors96. A bimodal artificial sensory neuron (BASE) realized the fusion of visual and haptic modalities97. Pressure sensors and photodetectors were the major components of the BASE patch, which operated as receptors in the retina and skin, respectively, transforming tactile and visual stimuli into electrical impulses. Signals transmitted from the BASE patch acted on skeletal myotubes through constructed neuromuscular junctions to simulate muscle motor control (Fig. 6f). Both visual feedback and tactile feedback were used to create the movement of a robot’s hands. However, merely supplying one-dimensional information led to placement problems, and the two modes cooperated to enable the robot arm to grip the target more accurately (Fig. 6f, g). Artificial sensory neurons/synapses with a fusion of touch and vision have been used in applications such as pattern recognition and postural control, but the perception of reliability, sensitivity, and accuracy of these mechanisms need to be improved. The artificial sensory system provides significant technical support and a driving force for biomedical and engineering application research and provides a bright future for the creation of intelligent prosthetics, intelligent organs, and humanoid robots.
Artificial intelligence memory and recognition
Neuroscientists are now paying more attention to the brain’s learning and memory functions98,99. Regarding the mechanisms of learning and memory mediated by neural networks, the current electrophysiological detection and regulation technology at the cellular level is not enough22,100,101,102. A high-performance electronic device was designed to train hippocampal neurons to learn by activating their memory function through electrical stimulation (Fig. 7a, b)103. Correlation and synchrony of the hippocampal neuronal networks with training were examined by a heatmap, which showed that the synchrony index increased with increasing training time (Fig. 7b). Furthermore, based on retinal photoreceptors and bipolar cells for motion detection and recognition (MDR), the two-dimensional retinal neuron hardware integrated three modules of optical perception, memory, and recognition104,105. The nonvolatile positive photocurrent (PPC) and negative photocurrent (NPC) matched the photoconductive switching states of the simulated retina photoreceptor and bipolar cell processing memory, realizing the detection and memory of moving objects (Fig. 7c, d)106. The motion detection function showed that the normalized pixel brightness of the static object was approximately zero, while the pixel brightness of a moving object was distributed in the whole region (Fig. 7e). This MDR hardware that was developed to simulate the function of the human retina can achieve efficient recognition and memory functions, which greatly promoted retinal simulation technology.
In addition, an all-optical pulse neuron device was designed to accomplish the AI task of pattern recognition107. A light pulse entered from the presynaptic neuron, forming postsynaptic spikes after certain weight processing, which was transmitted to a postsynaptic neuron (Fig. 7f). Neuron circuit components were applied to realize the function of AI108. In supervised mode, the device correctly learned and recognized “1010” and trained successfully when the neuron was subjected to input mode (Fig. 7g). The results showed that the neurosynaptic network circuit simulated synapses and pulse transmission between pairs of neurons using phase transitions of light-triggered material with the correct learning function. In addition, the neural network composed of four neurons showed different spike intensity changes after the four training modes, indicating that the designed neural network successfully recognized the four modes (Fig. 7h). The neural network simulated by this integrated design can self-learn to complete simple recognition tasks, and it runs several orders of magnitude faster than biological neural networks; thus, it can process large amounts of data in a short time. Deciphering the mechanisms of human memory is a major goal of neuroscience, and artificial intelligence memory and recognition could advance the treatment of memory disorders in humans.
Conclusions
By imitating the intricate design and function of the brain, neuron devices were developed to probe neural networks. To better understand and utilize the functional mechanism of the nervous system, neural signals were combined with various applied devices to advance science and society. The fusion of AI technology and neuroscience will facilitate the development of neuron devices, which is a common concern for researchers and patients. Of note, the integration of the efficiency and biosafety of materials will become design criteria for neuron devices, and several challenges should be addressed before clinical use109,110,111.
The design of neuron devices may focus on exploring a stable neural-electrode interface, an exquisite design process and efficient data processing. To develop ideal neuron devices, several aspects should be taken into account, as shown in Fig. 8. First, more sensitive neuron devices need to be developed to overcome the limitations of low sensitivity for neural signal recording13,31,109,110,111,112,113. The design of implant electrodes with smaller size and higher spatiotemporal resolution of sensors, such as optogenetic nanomaterials, biosensors and chemical sensors, may enable long-term sensitive signal recording6,32,33,114,115,116,117,118. Second, biocompatibility is important for the development of neuron devices. An electrode can be modified with nanomaterials possessing high catalytic activity, such as nanoclusters114,119,120,121,122,123, atomic level nanozymes122,124,125,126,127,128,129 and two-dimensional materials130,131,132,133, to reduce the inflammatory response of neural tissue. Third, integrated neuron devices can be developed to achieve multiple functions simultaneously134,135,136. For example, closed-loop monitoring-stimulation systems can be implanted into abnormal brain regions for long-term monitoring and treatment of neurological disorders, such as epilepsy and Alzheimer’s disease. Finally, AI technology can be used to achieve fast and efficient data processing. Combining AI with BCI and exploiting neural network algorithms will propel the development of neuron devices and improve neuroscience research.
References
Chen, R., Canales, A. & Anikeeva, P. Neural recording and modulation technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 1–16 (2017).
Khodagholy, D. et al. NeuroGrid: recording action potentials from the surface of the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 310–315 (2015).
Zhang, X. D. et al. Ultrasmall Au10-12(SG)(10-12) nanomolecules for high tumor specificity and cancer radiotherapy. Adv. Mater. 26, 4565–4568 (2014).
Zhang, X. D. et al. In vivo renal clearance, biodistribution, toxicity of gold nanoclusters. Biomaterials 33, 4628–4638 (2012).
Xi, J. Q. et al. A nanozyme-based artificial peroxisome ameliorates hyperuricemia and ischemic stroke. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 1–13 (2021).
Mu, X. Y. et al. An oligomeric semiconducting nanozyme with ultrafast electron transfers alleviates acute brain injury. Sci. Adv. 7, 1–17 (2021).
Mu, X. Y. et al. Carbogenic nanozyme with ultrahigh reactive nitrogen species selectivity for traumatic brain injury. Nano Lett. 19, 4527–4534 (2019).
Chen, K., Sun, S., Wang, J. Y. & Zhang, X. D. Catalytic nanozymes for central nervous system disease. Coord. Chem. Rev. 432, 1–33 (2021).
Hubel, D. H. Tungsten microelectrode for recording from single units. Science 125, 549–550 (1957).
Suk, H. J., Boyden, E. S. & van Welie, I. Advances in the automation of whole-cell patch clamp technology. J. Neurosci. Methods 326, 1–11 (2019).
Qian, Y. et al. A genetically encoded near-infrared fluorescent calcium ion indicator. Nat. Methods 16, 171–174 (2019).
Millett, D. Hans Berger - from psychic energy to the EEG. Perspect. Biol. Med. 44, 522–542 (2001).
Liu, S. J., Zhao, Y., Hao, W. T., Zhang, X. D. & Ming, D. Micro- and nanotechnology for neural electrode-tissue interfaces. Biosens. Bioelectron. 170, 1–17 (2020).
Ashrafian, H., Darzi, A. & Athanasiou, T. A novel modification of the Turing test for artificial intelligence and robotics in healthcare. Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg. 11, 38–43 (2015).
Willett, F. R., Avansino, D. T., Hochberg, L. R., Henderson, J. M. & Shenoy, K. V. High-performance brain-to-text communication via handwriting. Nature 593, 249–154 (2021).
Mehrotra, R., Ansari, M., Agrawal, R. & Anand, R. A transfer learning approach for AI-based classification of brain tumors. Mach. Learn 2, 1–12 (2020).
Gardner, J. W., Hines, E. L. & Wilkinson, M. Application of Artificial Neural Networks to an Electronic Olfactory System. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1, 446–451 (1990).
Poo, M. M. Towards brain-inspired artificial intelligence. Natl Sci. Rev. 5, 785–785 (2018).
McFarland, D. J. & Wolpaw, J. R. Brain-computer interface operation of robotic and prosthetic devices. Computer 41, 52–56 (2008).
Candemir, S. et al. Lung segmentation in chest radiographs using anatomical atlases with nonrigid registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 33, 577–590 (2014).
Chun, S. et al. An artificial neural tactile sensing system. Nat. Electron. 4, 429–438 (2021).
Sun, F. Q., Lu, Q. F., Feng, S. M. & Zhang, T. Flexible artificial sensory systems based on neuromorphic devices. ACS Nano 15, 3875–3899 (2021).
Dadarlat, M. C., O’Doherty, J. E. & Sabes, P. N. A learning-based approach to artificial sensory feedback leads tooptimal integration. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 138–144 (2015).
Yoon, J. H. et al. An artificial nociceptor based on a diffusive memristor. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–9 (2018).
Ge, J., Zhang, S., Liu, Z. Y., Xie, Z. K. & Pan, S. S. Flexible artificial nociceptor using a biopolymer-based forming-free memristor. Nanoscale 11, 6591–6601 (2019).
Seo, S. et al. Artificial optic-neural synapse for colored and color-mixed pattern recognition. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–8 (2018).
Lee, Y. & Lee, T. W. Organic synapses for neuromorphic electronics: from brain-inspired computing to sensorimotor nervetronics. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 964–974 (2019).
Zhang, X. et al. Internet of things meets brain-computer interface: a unified deep learning framework for enabling human-thing cognitive interactivity. IEEE Internet Things J. 6, 2084–2092 (2019).
Song, E. M., Li, J. H., Won, S. M., Bai, W. B. & Rogers, J. A. Materials for flexible bioelectronic systems as chronic neural interfaces. Nat. Mater. 19, 590–603 (2020).
Hong, G. S. & Lieber, C. M. Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 330–345 (2019).
Liu, S. et al. A high-performance electrode based on van der waals heterostructure for neural recording. Nano Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1022c00848 (2022).
Liu, H. L. et al. Catalytically potent and selective clusterzymes for modulation of neuroinflammation through single-atom substitutions. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–14 (2021).
Sun, S. et al. Atomic engineering of clusterzyme for relieving acute neuroinflammation through lattice expansion. Nano Lett. 21, 2562–2571 (2021).
Sakmann, B. & Neher, E. Patch clamp techniques for studying ionic channels in excitable membranes. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 46, 455–472 (1984).
Rubaiy, H. N. A short guide to electrophysiology and ion channels. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 20, 48–67 (2017).
Jasey, N. & Ward, I. Neuroplasticity in brain injury: maximizing recovery. Curr. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Rep. 7, 333–340 (2019).
Spira, M. E. & Hai, A. Multi-electrode array technologies for neuroscience and cardiology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 83–94 (2013).
Abbott, J. et al. CMOS nanoelectrode array for all-electrical intracellular electrophysiological imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 460–466 (2017).
Scholl, B., Thomas, C. I., Ryan, M. A., Kamasawa, N. & Fitzpatrick, D. Cortical response selectivity derives from strength in numbers of synapses. Nature 590, 111–114 (2021).
Buzsaki, G. Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 446–451 (2004).
Kozai, T. D. Y., Jaquins-Gerstl, A. S., Vazquez, A. L., Michael, A. C. & Cui, X. T. Brain tissue responses to neural implants impact signal sensitivity and intervention strategies. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 6, 48–67 (2015).
Yin, J., Hu, Y. & Yoon, J. Fluorescent probes and bioimaging: alkali metals, alkaline earth metals and pH. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 4619–4644 (2015).
Kim, E. H., Chin, G., Rong, G. X., Poskanzer, K. E. & Clark, H. A. Optical probes for neurobiological sensing and imaging. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 1023–1032 (2018).
Sakmann, B. & Neher, E. Patch clamp techniques for studying ionic channels in excitable membranes. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 46, 455–472 (1984).
Gao, J., Liao, C. Y., Liu, S. J., Xia, T. & Jiang, G. B. Nanotechnology: new opportunities for the development of patch-clamps. J. Nanobiotechnol. 19, 97–114 (2021).
Verkhratsky, A., Krishtal, O. A. & Petersen, O. H. From Galvani to patch clamp: the development of electrophysiology. Pflug. Arch. 453, 233–247 (2006).
Nevian, T., Larkum, M. E., Polsky, A. & Schiller, J. Properties of basal dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons: a direct patch-clamp recording study. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 206–214 (2007).
Otomo, K. et al. In vivo patch-clamp recordings reveal distinct subthreshold signatures and threshold dynamics of midbrain dopamine neurons. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–15 (2020).
Gao, J. et al. Application of electrophysiological technique in toxicological study: from manual to automated patch-clamp recording. Trends Anal. Chem. 133, 1–17 (2020).
Kodandaramaiah, S. B., Franzesi, G. T., Chow, B. Y., Boyden, E. S. & Forest, C. R. Automated whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology of neurons in vivo. Nat. Methods 9, 585–587 (2012).
Robinson, J. T. et al. Vertical nanowire electrode arrays as a scalable platform for intracellular interfacing to neuronal circuits. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 180–184 (2012).
Abbott, J. et al. A nanoelectrode array for obtaining intracellular recordings from thousands of connected neurons. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 232–241 (2020).
Smith, E. H. et al. Dual mechanisms of ictal high frequency oscillations in human rhythmic onset seizures. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–14 (2020).
Frere, S. & Slutsky, I. Alzheimer’s disease: from firing instability to homeostasis network collapse. Neuron 97, 32–58 (2018).
Shi, J. D. & Fang, Y. Flexible and implantable microelectrodes for chronically stable neural interfaces. Adv. Mater. 31, 1–7 (2019).
Rios, G., Lubenov, E. V., Chi, D., Roukes, M. L. & Siapas, A. G. Nanofabricated neural probes for dense 3-D recordings of brain activity. Nano Lett. 16, 6857–6862 (2016).
Paulk, A. C. et al. Large-scale neural recordings with single neuron resolution using Neuropixels probes in human cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 252–263 (2022).
Fu, T. M. et al. Stable long-term chronic brain mapping at the single-neuron level. Nat. Methods 13, 875–882 (2016).
Lee, H. J. et al. A multichannel neural probe with embedded microfluidic channels for simultaneous in vivo neural recording and drug delivery. Lab Chip 15, 1590–1597 (2015).
He, E. H. et al. Sensitive detection of electrophysiology and dopamine vesicular exocytosis of hESC-derived dopaminergic neurons using multifunctional microelectrode array. Biosens. Bioelectron. 209, 1–9 (2022).
Liu, J. N. et al. A highly sensitive and selective nanosensor for near-infrared potassium imaging. Sci. Adv. 6, 1–10 (2020).
Rong, G. X., Kim, E. H., Poskanzer, K. E. & Clark, H. A. A method for estimating intracellular ion concentration using optical nanosensors and ratiometric imaging. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–10 (2017).
Ding, F. F. et al. Changes in the composition of brain interstitial ions control the sleep-wake cycle. Science 352, 550–555 (2016).
Rasmussen, R. et al. Cortex-wide changes in extracellular potassium ions parallel brain state transitions in awake behaving mice. Cell Rep. 28, 1182–1194 (2019).
Octeau, J. C. et al. Transient, consequential increases in extracellular potassium ions accompany channelrhodopsin2 excitation. Cell Rep. 27, 2249–2261 (2019).
Johnston, J., Forsythe, I. D. & Kopp-Scheinpflug, C. Going native: voltage-gated potassium channels controlling neuronal excitability. J. Physiol. 588, 3187–3200 (2010).
Manville, R. W., Papanikolaou, M. & Abbott, G. W. Direct neurotransmitter activation of voltage-gated potassium channels. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–13 (2018).
Boyd, M. A. et al. Vesicle-based sensors for extracellular potassium detection. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 14, 459–469 (2021).
Liu, J. N. et al. A sensitive and specific nanosensor for monitoring extracellular potassium levels in the brain. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 321–330 (2020).
Chen, T. W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013).
Zhou, Y. C., Liu, E., Muller, H. & Cui, B. X. Optical electrophysiology: toward the goal of label-free voltage imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 10482–10499 (2021).
Peterka, D. S., Takahashi, H. & Yuste, R. Imaging voltage in neurons. Neuron 69, 9–21 (2011).
Hong, G. S. et al. Through-skull fluorescence imaging of the brain in a new near-infrared window. Nat. Photon. 8, 723–730 (2014).
Ma, H. Z., Wang, J. Y. & Zhang, X. D. Near-infrared II emissive metal clusters: from atom physics to biomedicine. Coord. Chem. Rev. 448, 1–35 (2021).
Liu, H. L. et al. Atomic-precision gold clusters for NIR-II imaging. Adv. Mater. 31, 1–9 (2019).
He, H. et al. Visible and near-infrared dual-emission carbogenic small molecular complex with high RNA selectivity and renal clearance for nucleolus and tumor imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 28529–28537 (2016).
Howes, P. D., Chandrawati, R. & Stevens, M. M. Colloidal nanoparticles as advanced biological sensors. Science 346, 53–63 (2014).
Flesher, S. N. et al. A brain-computer interface that evokes tactile sensations improves robotic arm control. Science 372, 831–836 (2021).
Zhou, A. et al. A wireless and artefact-free 128-channel neuromodulation device for closed-loop stimulation and recording in non-human primates. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 15–26 (2019).
Beuter, A., Lefaucheur, J. P. & Modolo, J. Closed-loop cortical neuromodulation in Parkinson’s disease: An alternative to deep brain stimulation? Clin. Neurophysiol. 125, 874–885 (2014).
Scangos, K. W. et al. Closed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression. Nat. Med. 27, 1696–1700 (2021).
Skarpaas, T. L., Jarosiewicz, B. & Morrell, M. J. Brain-responsive neurostimulation for epilepsy (RNS (R) System. Epilepsy Res. 153, 68–70 (2019).
Reinhart, R. M. G. & Nguyen, J. A. Working memory revived in older adults by synchronizing rhythmic brain circuits. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 820–827 (2019).
Grover, S., Nguyen, J. A., Viswanathan, V. & Reinhart, R. M. G. High-frequency neuromodulation improves obsessive-compulsive behavior. Nat. Med. 27, 232–238 (2021).
Amoli, V. et al. Biomimetics for high-performance flexible tactile sensors and advanced artificial sensory systems. J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 14816–14844 (2019).
Segil, J. L., Cuberovic, I., Graczyk, E. L., Weir, R. F. F. & Tyler, D. Combination of simultaneous artificial sensory percepts to identify prosthetic hand postures: a case study. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–15 (2020).
Lains, I. et al. Metabolomics in the study of retinal health and disease. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 69, 57–79 (2019).
Wang, H. L. et al. A ferroelectric/electrochemical modulated organic synapse for ultraflexible, artificial visual-perception system. Adv. Mater. 30, 1–9 (2018).
Kwon, S. M. et al. Environment-adaptable artificial visual perception behaviors using a light-adjustable optoelectronic neuromorphic device array. Adv. Mater. 31, 1–8 (2019).
Hao, D. D., Zhang, J. Y., Dai, S. L., Zhang, J. H. & Huang, J. Perovskite/organic semiconductor-based photonic synaptic transistor for artificial visual system. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 39487–39495 (2020).
Yuan, R. et al. A calibratable sensory neuron based on epitaxial VO2 for spike-based neuromorphic multisensory system. Nat. Commun. 13, 3973–3985 (2022).
Boutry, C. M. et al. A sensitive and biodegradable pressure sensor array for cardiovascular monitoring. Adv. Mater. 27, 6954–6961 (2015).
Lee, Y. R., Trung, T. Q., Hwang, B. U. & Lee, N. E. A flexible artificial intrinsic-synaptic tactile sensory organ. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–11 (2020).
Chun, K. Y., Son, Y. J., Jeon, E. S., Lee, S. & Han, C. S. A self-powered sensor mimicking slow- and fast-adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Adv. Mater. 30, 1–8 (2018).
Wan, C. J. et al. An artificial sensory neuron with tactile perceptual learning. Adv. Mater. 30, 1–7 (2018).
Kim, Y. et al. A bioinspired flexible organic artificial afferent nerve. Science 360, 998–1003 (2018).
Wan, C. J. et al. An artificial sensory neuron with visual-haptic fusion. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9 (2020).
Odawara, A., Katoh, H., Matsuda, N. & Suzuki, I. Induction of long-term potentiation and depression phenomena in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cortical neurons. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 469, 856–862 (2016).
Silveira, J. A. P., Protachevicz, P. R., Viana, R. L. & Batista, A. M. Effects of burst-timing-dependent plasticity on synchronous behaviour in neuronal network. Neurocomputing 436, 126–135 (2021).
Cheng, Z. G., Rios, C., Pernice, W. H. P., Wright, C. D. & Bhaskaran, H. On-chip photonic synapse. Sci. Adv. 3, 1–6 (2017).
Sung, C., Hwang, H. & Yoo, I. K. Perspective: a review on memristive hardware for neuromorphic computation. J. Appl. Phys. 124, 1–13 (2018).
Tan, H. W. et al. Light-gated memristor with integrated logic and memory functions. ACS Nano 11, 11298–11305 (2017).
Xu, S. H. et al. High-throughput PEDOT:PSS/PtNPs-modified microelectrode array for simultaneous recording and stimulation of hippocampal neuronal networks in gradual learning process. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 15736–15746 (2022).
Wang, C. Y. et al. Gate-tunable van der Waals heterostructure for reconfigurable neural network vision sensor. Sci. Adv. 6, 1–7 (2020).
Zhang, Z. H. et al. All-in-one two-dimensional retinomorphic hardware device for motion detection and recognition. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 27–32 (2022).
Euler, T., Haverkamp, S., Schubert, T. & Baden, T. Retinal bipolar cells: elementary building blocks of vision. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 507–519 (2014).
Feldmann, J., Youngblood, N., Wright, C. D., Bhaskaran, H. & Pernice, W. H. P. All-optical spiking neurosynaptic networks with self-learning capabilities. Nature 569, 208–214 (2019).
Tang, J. S. et al. Bridging biological and artificial neural networks with emerging neuromorphic devices: fundamentals, progress, and challenges. Adv. Mater. 31, 1–33 (2019).
Zhao, S. Y. et al. Full activation pattern mapping by simultaneous deep brain stimulation and fMRI with graphene fiber electrodes. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–12 (2020).
Zhang, J. et al. Stretchable transparent electrode arrays for simultaneous electrical and optical interrogation of neural circuits in vivo. Nano Lett. 18, 2903–2911 (2018).
Du, M. D. et al. Flexible micropillar electrode arrays for in vivo neural activity recordings. Small 15, 1–7 (2019).
Yin, R. K. et al. Soft transparent graphene contact lens electrodes for conformal full-cornea recording of electroretinogram. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–11 (2018).
Guo, Y. C. et al. Flexible and biocompatible nanopaper-based electrode arrays for neural activity recording. Nano Res. 11, 5604–5614 (2018).
Bian, P. X. et al. Enhanced catalysis of ultrasmall Au-MoS2 clusters against reactive oxygen species for radiation protection. Sci. Bull. 63, 925–934 (2018).
Gao, L. Z. et al. Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 577–583 (2007).
Mu, X. Y. et al. Black phosphorus quantum dot induced oxidative stress and toxicity in living cells and mice. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 20399–20409 (2017).
Ruan, H. et al. Single-Atom Pd/CeO2 nanostructures for mimicking multienzyme activities. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1022c00644 (2022).
Guo, J. et al. Atomically precise silver clusterzymes protect mice from radiation damages. J. Nanobiotechnol. 19, 1–14 (2021).
Li, G. & Jin, R. C. Atomically precise gold nanoclusters as new model catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1749–1758 (2013).
Guo, M. L. et al. Ligand-modulated catalytic selectivity of Ag clusterzyme for relieving multiorgan injury via inhabiting acute oxidative stress. Bioconjugate Chem. 32, 2342–2352 (2021).
Zhang, Y. G., Li, S., Liu, H. L., Long, W. & Zhang, X. D. Enzyme-Like Properties of Gold Clusters for Biomedical Application. Front. Chem. 8, 1–13 (2020).
Zhang, S. F. et al. Catalytic patch with redox Cr/CeO2 nanozyme of noninvasive intervention for brain trauma. Theranostics 11, 2806–2821 (2021).
Zhang, Y. G. et al. Catalytically active gold clusters with atomic precision for noninvasive early intervention of neurotrauma. J. Nanobiotechnol. 19, 1–13 (2021).
Huang, L., Chen, J. X., Gan, L. F., Wang, J. & Dong, S. J. Single-atom nanozymes. Sci. Adv. 5, 1–9 (2019).
Ji, S. F. et al. Matching the kinetics of natural enzymes with a single-atom iron nanozyme. Nat. Catal. 4, 407–417 (2021).
Pei, J. H. et al. Single-atom nanozymes for biological applications. Biomater. Sci. 8, 6428–6441 (2020).
Xu, B. L. et al. A Single-Atom Nanozyme for Wound Disinfection Applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 4911–4916 (2019).
Jiao, M. et al. Establishing bilateral modulation of radiation induced redox damage via biocatalytic single atom engineering at Au clusters. Chem. Eng. J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.136793 (2022).
Mu, X. Y. et al. Redox Trimetallic Nanozyme with Neutral Environment Preference for Brain Injury. ACS Nano 13, 1870–1884 (2019).
Bolotsky, A. et al. Two-Dimensional Materials in Biosensing and Healthcare: From In Vitro Diagnostics to Optogenetics and Beyond. ACS Nano 13, 9781–9810 (2019).
Chen, S. C. et al. Wafer-scale integration of two-dimensional materials in high-density memristive crossbar arrays for artificial neural networks. Nat. Electron. 3, 638–645 (2020).
Choi, C., Lee, Y., Cho, K. W., Koo, J. H. & Kim, D. H. Wearable and Implantable Soft Bioelectronics Using Two-Dimensional Materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 73–81 (2019).
Li, L. et al. A General Method for the Chemical Synthesis of Large-Scale, Seamless Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Electronics. Adv. Mater. 30, 1–9 (2018).
Park, S. et al. Adaptive and multifunctional hydrogel hybrid probes for long-term sensing and modulation of neural activity. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–12 (2021).
Shin, H. et al. Multifunctional multi-shank neural probe for investigating and modulating long-range neural circuits in vivo. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–11 (2019).
Chapman, C. A. R., Goshi, N. & Seker, E. Multifunctional Neural Interfaces for Closed-Loop Control of Neural Activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1–30 (2018).
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF1200700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91859101, 81971744, U1932107, 82001952, and 11804248), Outstanding Youth Funds of Tianjin (2021FJ-0009), National Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (Nos. 19JCZDJC34000, 20JCYBJC00940, 21JCYBJC00550, 21JCZDJC00620, and 21JCYBJC00490), the Innovation Foundation of Tianjin University, and CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team (JCTD-2020-08).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.-D.Z. conceived and designed the context of the article. X.-D.Z., Y.W., S.L., Y.Z., and H.W. prepared the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Liu, S., Wang, H. et al. Neuron devices: emerging prospects in neural interfaces and recognition. Microsyst Nanoeng 8, 128 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-022-00453-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-022-00453-4
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
High performance mechano-optoelectronic molecular switch
Nature Communications (2023)