Abstract
The experience of ethnic, racial, and structural inequalities is increasingly recognized as detrimental to health, and early studies suggest that its experience in pregnant mothers may affect the developing fetus. We characterized discrimination and acculturation experiences in a predominantly Hispanic sample of pregnant adolescent women and assessed their association with functional connectivity in their neonate’s brain. We collected self-report measures of acculturation, discrimination, maternal distress (i.e., perceived stress, childhood trauma, and depressive symptoms), and socioeconomic status in 165 women. Then, we performed a data-driven clustering of acculturation, discrimination, perceived stress, depressive symptoms, trauma, and socioeconomic status variables during pregnancy to determine whether discrimination or acculturation clustered into distinct factors. Discrimination and acculturation styles loaded onto different factors from perceived stress, depressive symptoms, trauma, and socioeconomic status, suggesting that they were distinct from other factors in our sample. We associated these data-driven maternal phenotypes (discrimination and acculturation styles) with measures of resting-state functional MRI connectivity of the infant amygdala (n = 38). Higher maternal report of assimilation was associated with weaker connectivity between their neonate’s amygdala and bilateral fusiform gyrus. Maternal experience of discrimination was associated with weaker connectivity between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex and stronger connectivity between the amygdala and fusiform of their neonate. Cautiously, the results may suggest a similarity to self-contained studies with adults, noting that the experience of discrimination and acculturation may influence amygdala circuitry across generations. Further prospective studies are essential that consider a more diverse population of minoritized individuals and with a comprehensive assessment of ethnic, racial, and structural factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The history of the United States is marked by ethnic, racial, and structural inequalities [1,2,3]. Beyond this, the United States’ history with immigration, and thus acculturation within immigrant populations, is nearly as old as the country itself [4]. Despite the rapidly growing foreign-born population in the United States [5], stressors related to ethnic, racial, and structural inequalities continue to contribute to adverse physical and mental health effects of immigrants and populations of color [6, 7]. The everyday experience of discrimination—the unjust treatment of individuals based on characteristics such as ethnic or racial group, gender, age, or sexual orientation [8]—and acculturative stress—the demands, strains, and ‘wear and tear’ of acculturation, or the process of adapting to a different culture [9]—are potential stressful experiences that can lead to adverse effects and the primary variables of interest for this study. Our understanding of how individuals may perceive these experiences is complex. It has been suggested that these experiences have varied effects on the health of individuals in prior studies [10].
The effects of discrimination and acculturation during pregnancy can have profound ramifications on offspring. Experiences of discrimination can be detrimental to the psychological well-being of pregnant women [11], and they are associated with increased infant mortality [12, 13], preterm birth [14], and decreased infant birth weight [15]. Similar experiences of acculturation are associated with depression [16,17,18,19,20], anxiety [21, 22], and stress, particularly acculturative stress [23, 24], in pregnant women. These experiences have unique and specific effects on psychological well-being that are not solely moderated or mediated by stress or depression [25]. Despite the profound impact these experiences can have on pregnant woman of color and their fetuses, scant research has characterized the impact of these experiences on brain-based outcomes in offspring. However, the comparative literature on outcomes in adults is more robust [10, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35].
Studies are beginning to demonstrate the neural correlates of discrimination, acculturation, and ethno-racial processing in adults [36,37,38]. Experiences of discrimination correlate with stronger resting state functional connectivity between the amygdala and several brain regions, including the frontal lobe [39]. The amygdala appears involved in automatic evaluation of discrimination and acculturation experiences [40]. Maternal discrimination and acculturation stressors have not explicitly been explored in relation to brain connectivity in infant offspring. However, studies of other prenatal stressors suggest that amygdala connectivity is a good candidate for investigating brain outcomes associated with these exposures [41,42,43,44]. Similar stressors can have unique biological pathways affecting the fetus [45, 46]. For example, perceived stress, anxiety, and depression can uniquely impact the newborn brain [47]. Thus, discrimination and acculturation stressors may have differential impacts on offspring outcomes than other stressors, a consideration the current study evaluates.
About half of the foreign-born population in the United States is of Latin American origin [48], making it a key population of interest to researchers working toward a better understanding of the effects of acculturation [49, 50]. Acculturative stress can negatively affect first, second, and third-generation immigrants [51]. The present study sought to better characterize discrimination and acculturation styles during pregnancy and their associated downstream effects on infant offspring. Our sample of convenience was predominantly Hispanic (88%) adolescent participants. To assess maternal experiences during pregnancy, we collected two measures of acculturation, an experience of discrimination scale, additional measures of maternal distress (i.e., perceived stress, childhood trauma, and depressive symptoms), and an index of socioeconomic status (i.e., income). First, we performed a data-driven clustering of acculturation, discrimination, perceived stress, depressive symptoms, trauma, and socioeconomic status during pregnancy to derive phenotypes distinct from other stressors. Next, we associated these data-driven phenotypes with measures of resting-state functional connectivity of the amygdala in the infants (n = 38) within 6 weeks following birth. Finally, we performed exploratory analyses associating the discrimination and acculturation stressors with measures of fetal development (i.e., head circumference; n = 92) and birth outcome data (i.e., gestational age at birth and Apgar score at 5 min; n = 155). We hypothesized that maternal experience of discrimination and acculturation would be associated with offspring individual differences in amygdala functional connectivity. The novelty of this research precluded specific hypotheses about the direction of these effects.
Methods and materials
Participants
One hundred sixty-five nulliparous pregnant women, aged 14 to 19 years, were recruited through the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC), Weill Cornell Medical College, and flyers posted in the CUIMC vicinity as a part of a prospective study from 2009 to 2012 examining the adolescent pregnancy behaviors and infant outcomes. The pregnant adolescents received routine prenatal care and had no major health problems at the time of recruitment. Participating women were excluded if they acknowledged the use of recreational drugs, tobacco, alcohol, or medications that affect cardiovascular functions or lacked fluency in English. The women provided informed written consent for themselves and their infants to participate in the study. For a subset, infants were imaged within the first 6 weeks of life (n = 38). Prenatal electronic health records were reviewed to collect ultrasound data and determine birth outcomes (n’s = 92–155). The New York State Psychiatric Institute Institutional Review Board approved all study procedures. The sample was predominantly Hispanic/Latinx.
Self-reported measures
We collected several measures of acculturation, discrimination, and distress during pregnancy. Detailed information about each measure can be found in the Supplementary.
For acculturation, we collected the Acculturation, Habits, and Interests Multicultural Scale for Adolescents (AHIMSA) and the Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics (SASH) during the 2nd or 3rd trimester (24–37 weeks of gestation). The AHIMSA measures integration (the identification with both cultures), assimilation (identification with the host culture), separation (identification with home culture), and marginalization (the identification with neither home nor host culture). The SASH measures high versus low assimilation. Self-reported language use—a standard proxy for acculturation—was also collected.
For discrimination, we collected the Experiences of Discrimination (EOD). The Experience of Discrimination (EOD) instrument measures self-reported experiences of discrimination and was scored by counting the number of situations for which a participant experienced discrimination [52]. EOD was collected at three time points during pregnancy: at 12–14, 24–26, and 34–36 weeks of gestation.
For distress, we collected the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Reynold’s Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS), and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire for distress. The PSS, and RADS were collected at three time points during pregnancy: at 12–14, 24–26, and 34–36 weeks of gestation. The CTQ was collected in the third trimester.
Self-reported family/self-income was collected as a 6-point ordinal variable (1: $0–$15,000, 2: $16,000–$25,000, …) as a measure of socioeconomic status.
Fetal and birth outcomes
We attained fetal morphometric measures and birth outcomes from participants’ electronic health records. Fetal morphometric measures were head circumference (HC) and biparietal diameter (BDP) collected between 16- and 40-weeks gestation. HC was measured along the outer perimeter of the calvaria, parallel to the biparietal diameter. BDP was measured from the outer margin of the proximal skull table to the inner margin of the distal skull table. Participants with two or more ultrasonography records were included to construct growth curves of the two primary fetal outcomes [53]. Birth outcomes were gestational age at birth and Apgar score at 5 min.
Seed connectivity
After preprocessing (as described in [54, 55] and the Supplementary), we assessed whole-brain seed to voxel connectivity from the right and left amygdala combined into a single seed (Fig. S1) using BioImage Suite [56]. The right and left seeds were manually defined on the reference brain. The time course of the reference region in each participant was then computed as the average time course across all voxels in the seed region. This time course was correlated with the time course for every other voxel in gray matter to create a map of r-values, reflecting seed-to-whole-brain connectivity. These r-values were transformed to z-values using Fisher’s transform, yielding one map for each seed, representing the strength of correlation with the seed for each participant.
Factor analysis
We performed an exploratory factor analysis to investigate the associations between discrimination, acculturation, and distress during pregnancy. The purpose of our factor analyses was twofold: (1) to identify whether the combination of other stressors was similar to or distinct from the discrimination and acculturation and (2) reduce the dimensions of the discrimination and acculturation collected. Using the R psych package, Eigenvalues were first examined to determine the appropriate number of factors; then, principal component analysis was conducted using Spearman’s or Pearson’s correlations. No rotations were used, and ordinary least squares was used to extract the factors. The integration and separation subscales of the AHIMSA were reverse coded to ensure only positive factor loadings. The scores of scales collected at multiple timepoints (i.e., PSS) were highly correlated (r > 0.5) and, thus, were averaged across trimesters into a single score used in analyses. The sum of all CTQ subscales was used. Self-reported family/self-income was included as a measure of socioeconomic status. Factor scores were calculated from the final model and used in subsequent primary analyses. For face validity, we investigated if language use—a standard proxy for acculturation—correlates with the acculturation factors (see Supplementary).
Statistical analyses
To assess the associations of the variable of interest with potential confounding variables, demographic and behavioral data were analyzed using standard χ2 test statistics or Fisher exact test for categorical data. Continuous data were analyzed using t-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests when a normal distribution could not be assumed to compare groups. Linear regression was used to associate fetal growth and birth outcomes with the discrimination and acculturation stressors. The dependent variables were performed with the three latent factors of discrimination and acculturation stressors (derived from the factor analysis) and discrimination as independent variables. The three latent factors of discrimination and acculturation stressors (derived from the factor analysis) were also associated to language use at home. Both unadjusted analyses and analyses adjusted by relevant covariates were performed. p values were two-sided. Bonferroni correction was used for non-imaging results. All analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software version 25 (IBM) or SAS statistical software version 9.3 (SAS Institute).
Imaging data were analyzed using voxel-wise linear models controlling for sex and postmenstrual age at scan included in a single model. For the primary analysis, the dependent measure was whole-brain functional connectivity of the amygdala. The independent variables were the acculturation factors and EOD. For analysis with EOD, EOD and imaging data were converted to ranks to account for skewness. Secondary analyses were performed to control for maternal depression and perceived stress. Imaging results were considered significant at p < 0.05, corrected for multiple statistical comparisons across gray matter using cluster-level correction [57, 58]. Cluster sizes were determined using AFNI’s 3dClustSim (version 16.3.05) with 10,000 iterations, an initial cluster forming threshold of p < 0.001, the gray matter mask applied in preprocessing, and a mixed-model spatial autocorrelation function (ACF). Parameters for the spatial ACF were estimated from the residuals of the voxel-wise linear models using 3dFWHMx. The latent factors of discrimination and acculturation stressors (derived from the factor analysis) were used as independent variables while controlling for the neonate’s postmenstrual age at scan and sex.
Results
Demographic characteristics
The maternal and neonatal demographic characteristics for the entire sample, ultrasound sample, and neonatal MRI sample are summarized in Table 1. Demographic characteristics for the total sample did not differ significantly from the subsample with MRI data. All women were adolescents with an average age of 18 years at the time of delivery. Most pregnant women were identified as Hispanic or Latinx (88.48%). Discrimination and acculturation stressors were similar between Hispanic and non-Hispanic individuals (see Supplementary). Ethnic and racial data are summarized in Table 2. Self-report measures of acculturation, discrimination, and other stressors are summarized in Table 3. Importantly, based on self-report data, all women in this study endorsed being a woman of color or underrepresented individual.
Factor analysis of discrimination and acculturation stressors
Our initial factor analysis included the 4 subscales of the AHIMSA (integration, assimilation, separation, and marginalization), the SASH, the EOD, the PSS, the CTQ, family/self-income, and the RADS. A correlation matrix of all these variables is shown in Fig. S2. Based on the elbow of the Scree plot of the eigenvalues, a 4-factor model was optimal (Fig. S3A). From this analysis, the CTQ, PSS and RADS scores clustered into a single factor; scores from the AHIMSA and the SASH clustered into three acculturation factors; and EOD and income did not cluster into a factor (Fig. S3B). The items and loadings are shown in Table S1. These results suggest that distress and discrimination are single constructs distinct from acculturation for the sample at hand and that acculturation clusters in multiple factors.
Given this, we performed a factor analysis including only the AHIMSA and the SASH. A 3-factor model was optimal and produced a nearly identical factor structure to the previous model (Fig. S3C, D and Table S2). From the AHIMSA, low integration and high assimilation clustered into a factor (labeled ASSIMILATION-INTEGRATION factor). High levels of ASSIMILATION-INTEGRATION factor reflect a pregnant woman who has come to identify with the host culture (assimilation) rather than integrating both cultures (integration). Separation from the AHIMSA and the SASH clustered into a factor (labeled ASSIMILATION-SEPARATION factor). Higher scores on the ASSIMILATION-SEPARATION factor reflect a pregnant woman who has come to identify with the host culture (assimilation) rather than their home culture (separation). Finally, marginalization loaded onto its own factor (labeled MARGINALIZED factor). Of note, both higher scores on the ASSIMILATION-INTEGRATION factor and higher ASSIMILATION-SEPARATION factor indicate a higher level of assimilation (i.e., identifying with the host culture). While these factors as similar in the positive direction, they differ in the negative direction. Lower scores on the ASSIMILATION-INTEGRATION factor indicate integration of home and host cultures, whereas lower scores on the ASSIMILATION-SEPARATION factor indicate higher identification with home culture. Figure 1 places the three derived factors in the context of the four acculturation categories (i.e., assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization). Together, these results suggest that the discrimination and acculturation stressors represent distinct factors from other stressors. Further investigations of these factors are presented in the Supplementary.
Maternal experiences of acculturation associates with amygdala connectivity
We associated the discrimination and acculturation stressors with offspring amygdala connectivity during the neonatal period. As only four women in the imaging sample endorsed experience of marginalization, the MARGINALIZED factor was dropped from this analysis. Higher ASSIMILATION-SEPARATION factor in mothers was associated with weaker connectivity between the amygdala and bilateral fusiform gyrus (p < 0.05; Fig. 2 and Table S3) in their offspring. No significant correlations between the ASSIMILATION-INTEGRATION factor and amygdala connectivity were observed. Models adjusted for other stressors (PSS, RADS, CTQ, SES) remained significant.
Maternal experiences of discrimination associates with amygdala connectivity
Neonates born to mothers experiencing discrimination had weaker connectivity between the amygdala and the medial and anterior prefrontal cortices (p < 0.05 corrected; Fig. 3 and Table S3) and stronger connectivity the amygdala and the left fusiform gyrus. Given the skewness of the EOD, we also dichotomized it to those experiencing discrimination and those not and repeated linear modeling. Results were similar. Models adjusted for other stressors (PSS, RADS, CTQ, SES) remained significant.
Exploratory: discrimination and acculturation stressors and fetal/birth outcomes
We investigated associations of discrimination and acculturation stressors on fetal growth (HC and BPD) and birth outcomes (gestational age at birth and Apgar score at 5 min). After correcting for multiple comparisons, none of the discrimination and acculturation stressors associated with these measures (Tables S4 and S5). The associations between the ASSIMILATION-INTEGRATION factor and slower BPD growth (Cohen’s D = 0.43), the ASSIMILATION-INTEGRATION factor and lower Apgar score at 5 min (Cohen’s D = 0.33), and the ASSIMILATION-SEPARATION factor and lower gestational age at birth (Cohen’s D = 0.34) were the only associations showing an effect size >0.30. Models adjusting for maternal demographic variables (maternal age and c-section, ethnicity, and pre-pregnancy body mass index) and other stressors (PSS, RADS, CTQ, SES) produce similar results.
Discussion
We investigated the structure of discrimination and acculturation-related factors during pregnancy and their effects on fetal and infant development in a predominantly Hispanic sample of adolescent mothers. Consistent with our hypothesis, discrimination and acculturation loaded onto different factors and independent of stressors (perceived stress, depressive symptoms, trauma, and socioeconomic status), suggesting that discrimination and acculturation factors are distinct from other factors considered stressors in our sample. Higher assimilation was associated with weaker amygdala and bilateral fusiform gyrus connectivity. Maternal experience of discrimination was associated with weaker connectivity between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex and stronger connectivity between the amygdala and fusiform gyrus. In exploratory analyses, the latent factors of discrimination and acculturation did not significantly associate with fetal growth, Apgar scores at 5 min, or gestational age at birth. Together, these results suggest that discrimination and acculturation factors are likely distinct from other stress-related factors, and they may alter fetal brain development.
Functional neuroimaging research has identified the amygdala as being involved in processing in-group and out-group membership, as well as ethnic or racial groups [40, 59, 60]. Our finding that maternal experiences of both acculturation and discrimination associated with amygdala-fusiform connectivity in infant offspring is intriguing. While it is difficult to compare our results directly to the adult literature, previous literature demonstrates an association between the fusiform and ethnic or racial processing in adults [61,62,63,64,65]. Amygdala-fusiform connectivity also plays a role in ethnic or racial processing of faces [60, 62, 66]. At 3 months of age, infants can begin discriminating between the faces of their own and other discrimination and acculturation groups as the “other-race effect” develops [67]. As in adults [63], familiarity causes infants to prefer faces of their discrimination and acculturation group to faces of others [68], but greater exposure to other discrimination and acculturation groups mitigates this preference [69]. Further, studies on young infants have shown that postnatal environmental exposures to people of different discrimination and acculturation groups and cultures affect infants’ perception [70].
Our findings may indicate that infants with mothers who report increased identification with their home culture are mainly exposed to faces of their discrimination and acculturation groups during early postnatal life. In contrast, greater maternal assimilation into the host culture may provide the infant greater exposure to other discrimination and acculturation faces. This early life exposure to other discrimination and acculturation groups’ faces may induce changes to brain function related to discrimination and acculturation processing (such as differences in amygdala-fusiform connectivity) before external behaviors are observable. Nevertheless, follow-up data during infancy would be needed to test these potential links and interweave other types of stimuli as control conditions, such as objects or non-human faces.
Broadly, a common sequela of early life adversity originating in the pre- and post-natal environment is altered amygdala-frontal circuitry [71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. Our results are consistent with previous reports of prenatal and other life stressors altering amygdala-frontal circuitry [78] and suggest that maternal experiences of discrimination during pregnancy may be an additional stressor that can affect this circuit. The association of discrimination experiences with the connectivity of amygdala-frontal circuits remains when accounting for maternal perceived stress and depressive symptoms, which are also known to affect these circuits [71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. These findings suggest a specificity to experiences of discrimination that are independent of other stressors. Prior studies have clarified that discrimination and acculturation affect psychological well-being in adults, independent of stress or depression [25]. Our finding would be in line with that literature. While many intercorrelated stressors and experiences may alter amygdala-frontal connectivity, their causal interactions are not understood. Studies understanding and delineating their shared and unique effects are needed.
The associations between amygdala connectivity, discrimination, and acculturation may also have emotional processing implications in later development. The amygdala contributes to the processing of affective visual information [79]. Indeed, emotional valence moderates the “other-race effect”; positive valence reduces this effect [80]. The amygdala likely contributes to this interaction [81]. Likewise, frontal networks act top-down to down-regulate the amygdala’s neural responses [82]. Given the importance of emotion processing and regulation in later mental health disorders [83], studies investigating the associations between prenatal discrimination and acculturation, infant brain measures, and later emotional regulation (as well as potential mediating effects) should be explored.
We observed insignificant associations of discrimination and acculturation stressors with fetal and birth outcomes, diverging from previous results. Study design and maternal characteristics may explain differences. Observed effect sizes were small to medium, suggesting that significant results would be observable with a larger sample, in line with previous studies [11, 14, 15, 23, 24]. Similarly, our sample consisted only of minoritized women. Thus, we did not compare outcomes to a reference population (typically, non-Hispanic white women) as in other studies. Finally, our sample consisted exclusively of adolescents. Maternal age itself is a potent variable affecting fetal and birth outcomes. Younger maternal age and mothers from a minoritized background are well-known predictors of worse fetal and birth outcomes [84]. The risk of worse outcomes might not linearly scale with discrimination and acculturation experienced by these individuals but rather lies within the inherent characteristics of this population.
Although we hypothesized that other known stress-related factors would be distinct from acculturation and discrimination, we did not specify how they might relate. Prior work indicates that acculturation could play a role in moderating the experience of discrimination. For example, as individuals become more integrated into their host society, their perception of discrimination may intensify [85, 86]. The experience of acculturative stress has also been shown to lessen with the presence or lack of familial social support and socioeconomic status [87]. In addition to our findings of no significant differences in acculturation between those who experienced discrimination and those who did not, future research could explore social support and an expanded number of socioeconomic factors.
Clarifying the biological mechanisms by which maternal discrimination and acculturation affect the developing fetal brain is also a potential next step. Many stressors can have similar immediate physiological responses in the mother and fetus (i.e., increased heart rate) but different longer-term physiological responses. As another example, perceived stress and depression can have a differential impact on maternal sleep, inflammation, and eating/nutrition, which in turn have unique downstream effects on the fetus [45, 46]. Nevertheless, even though exposure to various forms of maternal distress (perceived stress, depression, anxiety), discrimination, and acculturation may have different outcomes for the developing fetus, they may have shared biological mediators [47]. The maternal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis—the central stress response system [88]—is a critical pathway for maternal stressors to affect the developing fetus [89]. Future work should clarify how various stressors influence the biological pathways that alter infant connectivity.
Our study had several critical strengths. Our sample consisted entirely of women of color/underrepresented individuals, allowing for data collection from a population that may experience discrimination and acculturation and that is underrepresented in neuroimaging and biomedical studies. Also, our maternal sample consisted of adolescent pregnant women—another less studied population. Our unique approach to measuring acculturation combines two scales, the SASH, and AHIMSA. These measures have good construct validity [90, 91] and go beyond prior studies’ utilization of language as a primary determinant of acculturation. Furthermore, our study focuses on discrimination as separate from other stressors, an essential distinction given our sample and the current social climate.
Our study also had several limitations. Firstly, acculturation studies have limits concerning generalizability, given that every culture is different and people within each ethno-racial group are not homogenous. Our sample of convenience was predominantly Hispanic adolescent participants and is therefore only representative of this population. Future studies with more extensive and diverse samples will help better characterize the effects of prenatal experience of discrimination and acculturation. The acculturation measures, SASH and AHIMSA, used in the current study are tailored to acculturation in Hispanic individuals. As 12% of our sample were non-Hispanic, those individuals may not relate to all the items on the scales. Therefore, the scales might be less valid. Future studies should include measures that are more inclusive of other minoritized groups. We only had a single measure of SES rather than comprehensive measures of structural and systemic barriers (e.g., neighborhood-level characteristics). As in prior studies, these factors are essential and likely contributed to our findings [87]. Our infant sample was small and a majority male. As a result, it was underpowered to detect sex differences. Also, the literature on the neural correlates of discrimination, acculturation, and ethno-racial processing in adults involves more than just the amygdala [36,37,38]. Examining other brain regions is a needed future step. Finally, our study utilized a secondary data analysis. We obtained fetal and birth outcome data from electronic health records. Recordings of anthropometric variables can vary by medical personnel. Future studies should employ a prospective study design with measures of microaggressions, stigma, family support, and other structural factors to better understand the associations of discrimination and acculturation stress with infant outcomes.
It is also important to note that we do not have information regarding the length of time each participant has been in the United States (e.g., first versus other generation) or complementary qualitative interviews to ascertain the extent to which acculturation or discrimination is experienced as a stressor. Prior studies suggest acculturation experiences as stressors, and the impact on health is complex and can vary greatly [10]. Given that there was no significant association between acculturation and the distress measures (e.g., perceived stress); no significant difference in acculturation style between those who experienced discrimination and those who did not; and average report of lower levels of assimilation, separation, and marginalization on the AHIMSA, it is possible that our study sample experienced lower levels of acculturation-related stress Lastly, the self-identification of race of Latinx populations is complex. For example, many self-identify as indigenous [92]. A high proportion of individuals in our sample reported indigenous race, so we needed more variation to conduct analyses at the race level.
Conclusion
As our society strives for greater cultural inclusivity and sensitivity, we must become aware of the effects that the experience of acculturation and discrimination have on pregnant women and their infants. Our findings suggest that maternal prenatal discrimination and acculturation could be additional stressors associated with neonatal functional connectivity of the amygdala. Even though our study is with infants, it is essential to consider our findings in the larger context of the adult literature related to discrimination and acculturation [10, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35] as these infants will continue to grow and the priming of the maternal experience will become integral to the cumulative exposure from their own personal experience of discrimination and acculturation throughout their life. Studies would benefit from including discrimination and acculturation to further understand the effects of these stressors on brain development of future generations. Longitudinal designs that consider the downstream or long-term effects, such as accelerated aging, are needed [27, 28].
Change history
11 January 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-024-01798-2
References
Krieger N. ENOUGH: COVID-19, structural racism, police brutality, plutocracy, climate change-and time for health justice, democratic governance, and an equitable, sustainable future. Am J Public Health. 2020;110:1620–23.
Gover AR, Harper SB, Langton L. Anti-Asian hate crime during the COVID-19 pandemic: exploring the reproduction of inequality. Am J Crim Justice. 2020;45:647–67.
Tessler H, Choi M, Kao G. The anxiety of being Asian American: hate crimes and negative biases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Crim Justice. 2020;45:636–46.
D’Vera C. Future immigration will change the face of America by 2065. 2015. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/618835/future-immigration-will-change-the-face-of-america-by-2065/.
Frey WH. The growing diversity of the US population. Futuribles. 2020;439:35–46.
Paradies Y, Ben J, Denson N, Elias A, Priest N, Pieterse A, et al. Racism as a determinant of health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0138511.
Vernice NA, Pereira NM, Wang A, Demetres M, Adams LV. The adverse health effects of punitive immigrant policies in the United States: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0244054.
Association AP. Discrimination: what it is, and how to cope. Psychology Help Center. 2019;10:a0016059.
Berry JW. Acculturation: A Conceptual Overview. In: Bornstein MH, Cote LR, editors. Acculturation and parent-child relationships: Measurement and development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2006. pp. 13–30.
Lara M, Gamboa C, Kahramanian MI, Morales LS, Bautista DE. Acculturation and Latino health in the United States: a review of the literature and its sociopolitical context. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:367–97.
Sluiter F, Incollingo Rodriguez AC, Nephew BC, Cali R, Murgatroyd C, Santos HP Jr. Pregnancy associated epigenetic markers of inflammation predict depression and anxiety symptoms in response to discrimination. Neurobiol Stress. 2020;13:100273.
Collins JW Jr, David RJ. Racial disparity in low birth weight and infant mortality. Clin Perinatol. 2009;36:63–73.
Earnshaw VA, Rosenthal L, Lewis JB, Stasko EC, Tobin JN, Lewis TT, et al. Maternal experiences with everyday discrimination and infant birth weight: a test of mediators and moderators among young, urban women of color. Ann Behav Med. 2013;45:13–23.
Giurgescu C, Engeland CG, Zenk SN, Kavanaugh K. Stress, inflammation and preterm birth in African American women. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2013;13:171–7.
D’Anna-Hernandez KL, Hoffman MC, Zerbe GO, Coussons-Read M, Ross RG, Laudenslager ML. Acculturation, maternal cortisol, and birth outcomes in women of Mexican descent. Psychosom Med. 2012;74:296–304.
D’Anna-Hernandez KL, Aleman B, Flores AM. Acculturative stress negatively impacts maternal depressive symptoms in Mexican-American women during pregnancy. J Affect Disord. 2015;176:35–42.
Calzada EJ, Sales A. Depression among Mexican-origin mothers: exploring the immigrant paradox. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2019;25:288.
Capielo Rosario C, Dillon F. Ni de aquí, ni de allá: Puerto Rican acculturation-acculturative stress profiles and depression. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2020;26:42.
Hill DJ, Blanco Martinez S, Mejia Y, Kulish AL, Cavanaugh AM, Stein GL. Depressive symptoms in Latina mothers in an emerging immigrant community. Cult Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2019;25:397–402.
Walker JL, Ruiz RJ, Chinn JJ, Marti N, Ricks TN. Discrimination, acculturation and other predictors of depression among pregnant Hispanic women. Ethn Dis. 2012;22:497–503.
Barcelona de Mendoza V, Harville E, Theall K, Buekens P, Chasan-Taber L. Effects of acculturation on prenatal anxiety among Latina women. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19:635–44.
D’Anna-Hernandez KL, Garcia E, Coussons-Read M, Laudenslager ML, Ross RG. Sleep moderates and mediates the relationship between acculturation and depressive symptoms in pregnant Mexican-American women. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20:422–33.
Chasan-Taber L, Kini N, Harvey MW, Pekow P, Dole N. The association between acculturation and prenatal psychosocial stress among Latinas. J Immigr Minor Health. 2020;22:534–44.
Caplan S. Latinos, acculturation, and acculturative stress: a dimensional concept analysis. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2007;8:93–106.
Grobman WA, Parker CB, Willinger M, Wing DA, Silver RM, Wapner RJ, et al. Racial disparities in adverse pregnancy outcomes and psychosocial stress. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:328–35.
Sifers SK, Puddy RW, Warren JS, Roberts MC. Reporting of demographics, methodology, and ethical procedures in journals in pediatric and child psychology. J Pediatr Psychol. 2002;27:19–25.
Geronimus AT, Hicken M, Keene D, Bound J. Weathering” and age patterns of allostatic load scores among blacks and whites in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:826–33.
Carter SE, Ong ML, Simons RL, Gibbons FX, Lei MK, Beach SRH. The effect of early discrimination on accelerated aging among African Americans. Health Psychol. 2019;38:1010–13.
Bradford DE, DeFalco A, Perkins ER, Carbajal I, Kwasa J, Goodman FR, et al. Whose signals are being amplified? Toward a more equitable clinical psychophysiology. Clin Psychol Sci. 2022;1–16.
Webb EK, Weis CN, Huggins AA, Fitzgerald JM, Bennett K, Bird CM, et al. Neural impact of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage in traumatically injured adults. Neurobiol Stress. 2021;15:100385.
Harnett NG, Wheelock MD, Wood KH, Goodman AM, Mrug S, Elliott MN, et al. Negative life experiences contribute to racial differences in the neural response to threat. Neuroimage. 2019;202:116086.
Carter SE, Mekawi Y, Harnett NG. It’s about racism, not race: a call to purge oppressive practices from neuropsychiatry and scientific discovery. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47:2179–80.
Williams DR. Race, socioeconomic status, and health. The added effects of racism and discrimination. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:173–88.
Williams DR, Priest N, Anderson NB. Understanding associations among race, socioeconomic status, and health: patterns and prospects. Health Psychol. 2016;35:407–11.
Ford CL, Airhihenbuwa CO. The public health critical race methodology: praxis for antiracism research. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:1390–8.
Berger M, Sarnyai Z. “More than skin deep”: stress neurobiology and mental health consequences of racial discrimination. Stress. 2015;18:1–10.
Masten CL, Telzer EH, Eisenberger NI. An FMRI investigation of attributing negative social treatment to racial discrimination. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011;23:1042–51.
Wright KD, Jack AI, Friedman JP, Jones LM, Sattar A, Fresco DM, et al. Neural processing and perceived discrimination stress in African Americans. Nurs Res. 2020;69:331–38.
Clark US, Miller ER, Hegde RR. Experiences of discrimination are associated with greater resting amygdala activity and functional connectivity. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018;3:367–78.
Kubota JT, Banaji MR, Phelps EA. The neuroscience of race. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15:940–8.
Rifkin-Graboi A, Bai J, Chen H, Hameed WBR, Sim LW, Tint MT, et al. Prenatal maternal depression associates with microstructure of right amygdala in neonates at birth. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;74:837–44.
Qiu, Anh TT, Li Y, Chen H, Rifkin-Graboi A, Broekman BF, et al. Prenatal maternal depression alters amygdala functional connectivity in 6-month-old infants. Transl Psychiatry. 2015;5:e508.
Posner J, Cha J, Roy A, Peterson B, Bansal R, Gustafsson H, et al. Alterations in amygdala–prefrontal circuits in infants exposed to prenatal maternal depression. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6:e935.
Scheinost D, Kwon SH, Lacadie C, Sze G, Sinha R, Constable RT, et al. Prenatal stress alters amygdala functional connectivity in preterm neonates. NeuroImage Clin. 2016;12:381–88.
Monk C, Lugo-Candelas C, Trumpff C. Prenatal developmental origins of future psychopathology: mechanisms and pathways. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:317–44.
Monk C, Sloan RP, Myers MM, Ellman L, Werner E, Jeon J, et al. Fetal heart rate reactivity differs by women’s psychiatric status: an early marker for developmental risk? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;43:283–90.
Scheinost D, Spann MN, McDonough L, Peterson BS, Monk C. Associations between different dimensions of prenatal distress, neonatal hippocampal connectivity, and infant memory. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;45:1272–79.
Acosta Y. The foreign born from Latin America and the Caribbean: 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau; 2011.
Ennis S, Rios-Vargas M, Albert N. Census brief C2010BR-04. The Hispanic population: 2010. Washington: US Census Bureau; 2011.
Abraído-Lanza AF, Echeverría SE, Flórez KR. Latino immigrants, acculturation, and health: promising new directions in research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:219–36.
Lueck K, Wilson M. Acculturative stress in Latino immigrants: the impact of social, socio-psychological and migration-related factors. Int J Intercult Relat. 2011;35:186–95.
Krieger N. Racial and gender discrimination: risk factors for high blood pressure?. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30:1273–81.
Spann MN, Scheinost D, Feng T, Barbato K, Lee S, Monk C, et al. Association of maternal prepregnancy body mass index with fetal growth and neonatal thalamic brain connectivity among adolescent and young women. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2024661.
Kwon SH, Scheinost D, Lacadie C, Benjamin J, Myers EH, Qiu M, et al. GABA, resting-state connectivity and the developing brain. Neonatology. 2014;106:149–55.
Kwon SH, Scheinost D, Lacadie C, Sze G, Schneider KC, Dai F, et al. Adaptive mechanisms of developing brain: cerebral lateralization in the prematurely-born. Neuroimage. 2015;108:144–50.
Joshi A, Scheinost D, Okuda H, Belhachemi D, Murphy I, Staib LH, et al. Unified framework for development, deployment and robust testing of neuroimaging algorithms. Neuroinformatics. 2011;9:69–84.
Cox RW, Chen G, Glen DR, Reynolds RC, Taylor PA. fMRI clustering and false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E3370–71.
Cox RW, Chen G, Glen DR, Reynolds RC, Taylor PA. FMRI clustering in AFNI: false-positive rates redux. Brain Connect. 2017;7:152–71.
Lieberman MD, Hariri A, Jarcho JM, Eisenberger NI, Bookheimer SY. An fMRI investigation of race-related amygdala activity in African-American and Caucasian-American individuals. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:720–2.
Hart AJ, Whalen PJ, Shin LM, McInerney SC, Fischer H, Rauch SL. Differential response in the human amygdala to racial outgroup vs ingroup face stimuli. Neuroreport. 2000;11:2351–5.
Golby AJ, Gabrieli JDE, Chiao JY, Eberhardt JL. Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:845–50.
Zhou G, Liu J, Xiao NG, Wu SJ, Li H, Lee K. The fusiform face area plays a greater role in holistic processing for own-race faces than other-race faces. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:220.
Farmer H, Hewstone M, Spiegler O, Morse H, Saifullah A, Pan X, et al. Positive intergroup contact modulates fusiform gyrus activity to black and white faces. Sci Rep. 2020;10:2700.
Kesner L, Fajnerová I, Adámek P, Buchtík M, Grygarová D, Hlinka J, et al. Fusiform activity distinguishes between subjects with low and high xenophobic attitudes toward refugees. Front Behav Neurosci. 2020;14:98.
Brosch T, Bar-David E, Phelps EA. Implicit race bias decreases the similarity of neural representations of black and white faces. Psychol Sci. 2013;24:160–6.
Herrington JD, Taylor JM, Grupe DW, Curby KM, Schultz RT. Bidirectional communication between amygdala and fusiform gyrus during facial recognition. Neuroimage. 2011;56:2348–55.
Kelly DJ, Quinn PC, Slater AM, Lee K, Ge L, Pascalis O. The other-race effect develops during infancy: evidence of perceptual narrowing. Psychol Sci. 2007;18:1084–9.
Kelly DJ, Quinn PC, Slater AM, Lee K, Gibson A, Smith M, et al. Three‐month‐olds, but not newborns, prefer own‐race faces. Dev Sci. 2005;8:F31–6.
Bar-Haim Y, Ziv T, Lamy D, Hodes RM. Nature and nurture in own-race face processing. Psychol Sci. 2006;17:159–63.
Quinn PC, Lee K, Pascalis O. Perception of face race by infants: five developmental changes. Child Dev Perspect. 2018;12:204–09.
Gee DG, Gabard-Durnam LJ, Flannery J, Goff B, Humphreys KL, Telzer EH, et al. Early developmental emergence of human amygdala-prefrontal connectivity after maternal deprivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:15638–43.
Posner J, Cha J, Roy AK, Peterson BS, Bansal R, Gustafsson HC, et al. Alterations in amygdala-prefrontal circuits in infants exposed to prenatal maternal depression. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6:e935.
Humphreys KL, Camacho M, Roth MC, Estes EC. Prenatal stress exposure and multimodal assessment of amygdala–medial prefrontal cortex connectivity in infants. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020;46:100877.
Park AT, Leonard JA, Saxler PK, Cyr AB, Gabrieli JDE, Mackey AP. Amygdala–medial prefrontal cortex connectivity relates to stress and mental health in early childhood. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018;13:430–39.
Nieves GM, Bravo M, Baskoylu S, Bath KG. Early life adversity decreases pre-adolescent fear expression by accelerating amygdala PV cell development. Elife. 2020;9:e55263.
Hay RE, Reynolds JE, Grohs MN, Paniukov D, Giesbrecht GF, Letourneau N, et al. Amygdala-prefrontal structural connectivity mediates the relationship between prenatal depression and behavior in preschool boys. J Neurosci. 2020;40:6969.
Phillips ML, Schmithorst VJ, Banihashemi L, Taylor M, Samolyk A, Northrup JB, et al. Patterns of infant amygdala connectivity mediate the impact of high caregiver affect on reducing infant smiling: discovery and replication. Biol Psychiatry. 2021;90:342–52.
Dufford AJ, Spann M, Scheinost D. How prenatal exposures shape the infant brain: insights from infant neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;131:47–58.
Pessoa L, Adolphs R. Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a ‘low road’ to ‘many roads’ of evaluating biological significance. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:773–83.
Johnson KJ, Fredrickson BL. We all look the same to me: positive emotions eliminate the own-race in face recognition. Psychol Sci. 2005;16:875–81.
Telzer EH, Humphreys KL, Shapiro M, Tottenham N. Amygdala sensitivity to race is not present in childhood but emerges over adolescence. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013;25:234–44.
Berboth S, Morawetz C. Amygdala-prefrontal connectivity during emotion regulation: a meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions. Neuropsychologia. 2021;153:107767.
Berking M, Wupperman P. Emotion regulation and mental health: recent findings, current challenges, and future directions. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012;25:128–34.
DuPlessis HM, Bell R, Richards T. Adolescent pregnancy: understanding the impact of age and race on outcomes. J Adolesc Health. 1997;20:187–97.
Aguirre BE, Saenz R, Hwang S-S. Discrimination and the assimilation and ethnic competition perspectives. Soc Sci Q. 1989;70:594.
Michelson MR. The corrosive effect of acculturation: how Mexican Americans lose political trust. Soc Sci Q. 2003;84:918–33.
Hovey JD, Magaña C. Acculturative stress, anxiety, and depression among Mexican immigrant farmworkers in the midwest United States. J Immigr Health. 2000;2:119–31.
Smith SM, Vale WW. The role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in neuroendocrine responses to stress. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2006;8:383–95.
Kinsella MT, Monk C. Impact of maternal stress, depression and anxiety on fetal neurobehavioral development. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52:425–40.
Ellison J, Jandorf L, Duhamel K. Assessment of the Short Acculturation Scale for Hispanics (SASH) among low-income, immigrant Hispanics. J Cancer Educ. 2011;26:478–83.
Unger JGP, Shakib S, Ritt-Olson A, Palmer P, Johnson C. The AHIMSA Acculturation Scale: a new measure of acculturation for adolescents in a multicultural society. J Early Adolesc. 2002;22:225–51.
Parker K, Horowitz JM, Morin R, Lopez MH. The many dimensions of Hispanic racial identity. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2015.
Schwartz SJ, Unger JB, Zamboanga BL, Szapocznik J. Rethinking the concept of acculturation: implications for theory and research. Am Psychol. 2010;65:237–51.
Acknowledgements
We also wish to thank Kristiana Barbato, Dr. Ezra Aydin, and Dr. Angeliki Pollatou for helpful feedback on the manuscript concepts and Dr. Seonjoo Lee for providing initial consultation regarding the statistical analysis.
Funding
Data were provided by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) MH093677 (CM and BSP) grant. This work was also supported by NIMH K24MH127381 (MNS), R01MH126133 (MNS and DS), R01MH117983 Supplements 1 (APL) and 2 (AD); the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences TL1TR001875 (CMH); National Health and Lung and Blood Disease Institute R25HL096260, the BEST-DP: Biostatistics & Epidemiology Summer Training Diversity Program (RK and VO); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development K23HD092589 (MNS); and the Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Irving Scholar Award (MNS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MNS, BC, CM, BSP and DS contributed to conception or design of the work. MNS, KA, CMH, AD, APL, CB, VO, RK, ES, BSP, CM and DS contributed to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work. MNS, KA, APL, CB, VO, RK and DS wrote the manuscript. CMH, AD, ES, BC, BSP and CM critically revised the paper. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. CMH and KA contributed equally as second authors of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised due to a retrospective Open Access order.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Spann, M.N., Alleyne, K., Holland, C.M. et al. The effects of experience of discrimination and acculturation during pregnancy on the developing offspring brain. Neuropsychopharmacol. 49, 476–485 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01765-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-023-01765-3