Abstract
Cholesterol metabolism reprogramming is one of the significant characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Cholesterol increases the risk of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancer. Sterol O-acyltransferases 1 (SOAT1) maintains the cholesterol homeostasis. However, the exact mechanistic contribution of SOAT1 to EMT in HCC remains unclear. Here we demonstrated that SOAT1 positively related to poor prognosis of HCC, EMT markers and promoted cell migration and invasion in vitro, which was mediated by the increased cholesterol in plasmalemma and cholesterol esters accumulation. Furthermore, we reported that SOAT1 disrupted cholesterol metabolism homeostasis to accelerate tumorigenesis and development in HCC xenograft and NAFLD-HCC. Also, we detected that nootkatone, a sesquiterpene ketone, inhibited EMT by targeting SOAT1 in vitro and in vivo. Collectively, our finding indicated that SOAT1 promotes EMT and contributes to hepatocarcinogenesis by increasing cholesterol esterification, which is suppressed efficiently by nootkatone. This study demonstrated that SOAT1 is a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in NAFLD-HCC and SOAT1-targeting inhibitors are expected to be the potential new therapeutic treatment for HCC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most leading causes of cancer in the worldwide with high mortality rate [1]. Following with the raised incidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) worldwide, NAFLD-associated HCC (NAFLD-HCC) was increasingly recognized as the leading cause of HCC [2]. Increasing evidence demonstrates that abnormal lipid metabolism is a vital reason for cancer occurrence [3]. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays an important role in tumor metastasis, in which epithelial cells lose epithelial characteristics and acquire mesenchymal phenotype [4]. EMT can coordinate kinds of complementary cancer characteristics, including tumor cell stemness, tumorigenicity, resistance to therapy, and adaptation to variable microenvironment [5]. Though there are novel chemotherapeutic interventions and target therapy, the overall prognosis of patients with HCC is still poor owe to the high rates of intrahepatic and distal metastasis [6, 7]. Previous studies have reported that EMT can be regulated to promote metastasis in HCC. Cancer stem cells own infinite differentiation potential and self-renewal properties, which lead to cell growth, distant and metastasis in HCC [8, 9]. Therefore, exploring the molecular mechanism of regulating the EMT in HCC cells has great significance for inhibiting the HCC metastasis and improving the poor prognosis of patients.
Cholesterol is an essential lipid of plasma membrane and supports the requirements of cell proliferation growth and structure [10]. Reprogramming cholesterol metabolism such as accelerated synthesis and abnormal uptake are closely related to the development of HCC [11, 12]. In the tumor microenvironment, cholesterol metabolism is usually enhanced to support cancer progression. Squalene epoxidase (SQLE) induced the development of NAFLD-HCC via promoting the biosynthesis of cholesterol esters [13]. Cholesterol uptake through the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) is vital for the growth of ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma cells and patient-derived xenografts [12]. In addition, dietary cholesterol has been proved to promote NAFLD-HCC [14]. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) expression was up-regulated in human HCC along with enhanced mitochondrial cholesterol content [15]. 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA synthase (HMGCS) can convert acetyl coenzyme A into HMG-CoA, which plays an important role in the process of cholesterol synthesis [16]. CSN6 stabilizes HMGCS1 protein by preventing SPOP-mediated HMGCS1 ubiquitination and degradation [17]. Cholesterol drives the development of HCC by regulating the distribution of lncRNA SNHG6 between organelles [18]. Cholesterol and its metabolites also effect immune microenvironment of tumor. Oxysterols, a cholesterol oxidation product, regulates transcription factors (SREBP2 and LXR) related to cholesterol metabolism, which in turn leads to T cell dysfunction [19]. Therefore, targeting cholesterol metabolism reprogramming could regulate the genesis and metastasis in HCC.
Sterol O-acyltransferases (SOAT), also known as ACAT, has two isoforms in mammals, SOAT1 and SOAT2. SOAT1, localized on the endoplasmic reticulum, performs catalytic functions as dimers or tetramers and could esterify cholesterol to cholesterol ester [20]. Increasing evidence indicates that the suppression of SOAT1 blocked tumor growth, such as glioblastoma [21], pancreatic cancer [22], colon cancer [23], and gastric cancer [24]. However, the underlying mechanism whether SOAT1 promotes EMT in HCC remains to be explored.
Terpenoids have been widely studied in vitro and in vivo due to their unique anti-tumor biological characteristics [25]. Nootkatone, a natural plant sesquiterpene ketone, exhibits pharmacological activity on regulating inflammation, apoptosis, and autophagy [26, 27]. Besides, nootkatone exerts anticancer effects on colorectal cancer [27] and non-small-cell-lung cancer [28]. And, it has been reported that nootkatone has effect on hepatic fibrosis [29]. However, the inhibitive effect of nootkatone on HCC has not been reported.
Recently, it has proved that SOAT1 promoted proliferation and is associated with early-stage HCC [30]. However, whether SOAT1 promotes EMT in HCC has not been known yet. Here, we report a direct correlation of increased expression of SOAT1 with EMT in HCC. Our results indicate that SOAT1 promotes EMT in HCC through maintaining cholesterol homeostasis and therapeutic efficacy of nootkatone on NAFLD-HCC, which supports the critical role of the metabolic microenvironment in HCC metastasis, providing a new insight for the precision therapy on HCC.
Materials and methods
Bioinformatic analysis
Five gene expression profiles GSE99807 [31], GSE164760 [32], GSE50579 [33], GSE14520-GPL3921 [34], and GSE33006 [35] were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). Differentially expressed genes were screened through GEO2R. Then the up-regulated and down-regulated DEGs were, respectively, intersected via Venn analysis (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/) to obtain mutual DEGs. The Gene Ontology (GO) annotations and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs were performed using DAVID 2021 software (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/). The interaction between DEGs were confirmed by STRING database (https://cn.string-db.org/). Representative IHC pictures of SOAT1 were obtained from The Human Protein Atlas (THPA) (https://www.proteinatlas.org/). SOAT1 expression data and clinical data were extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). SOAT1 expression in HCC cells was obtained from Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) (https://sites.broadinstitute.org/ccle/datasets).
HCC sample analysis
Twenty-two cases of HCC samples were collected from Liaocheng People’s Hospital, which was individually examined by certified pathologists for Edmondson–Steiner (ES) grade and microvascular invasion (MVI) grade according to the WHO published standardizations. This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Liaocheng People’s Hospital and Tianjin University of Science and Technology. The sample collection has obtained informed consent from all participants. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analyzed the expression level of SOAT1 and its correlation with ES and MVI grade.
Cell culture
HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cells were purchased from Cell Bank of Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco) with 10% FBS (YEASEN) and 1% antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin and 10 μg/mL streptomycin, YEASEN) at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.
Plasmid construction and transfection
pcDNA3.1-3×Flag-SOAT1 and pRNAT-U6.1/Neo was purchased from YouBio. Small hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting human SOAT1 was constructed into pRNAT-U6.1/Neo. The sequence of shSOAT1 was as follows: (5’-TGGTCCATGACTGGCTATATTCTCGAGAATATAGCCAGTCATGGACCATTTTTT-3’).
Cells were transfected with plasmids DNA at 70–95% confluence using Hieff Trans TM Liposomal transfection Reagent (YEASEN) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
Western blot analysis
Cells or tissues were washed by precooling PBS and lysed with cold RIPA buffer (Beyotime) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (MCE) in ice for 30 min, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected, and protein concentrations were determined using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime). Total protein was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membrane (Millipore) and the membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk for 1 h. Then, the membrane was incubated over night at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-SOAT1 (ABclonal, 1:1000), rabbit anti-E-cadherin (Bioss, 1:1000), rabbit anti-Occludin (Proteintech, 1:10,000), rabbit anti-Vimentin (Bioss, 1:1000), rabbit anti-Twist1 (Proteintech, 1:2000), rabbit anti-N-cadherin (Proteintech, 1:5000), rabbit anti-Slug (Proteintech, 1:10,000), rabbit anti-Snail1 (Proteintech, 1:800), rabbit anti-Fibronectin (Proteintech, 1:10,000), rabbit anti-SREBP2 (ABclonal, 1:1000), rabbit anti-LDLR (Proteintech, 1:2000), rabbit anti-ITGB4 (Proteintech, 1:600), rabbit anti-ITGAV (Abbkine, 1:1000), rabbit anti-AFP (Proteintech, 1:1500), mouse anti-GAPDH (Proteintech, 1:25,000). Then, the membranes were washed three times with TBST for 10 min at room temperature and incubated with secondary antibody (YEASEN, 1:5000) at room temperature for 1 h. The bands were visualized using SuperKine™ ECL (Abbkine) with Chemiluminescent Imaging System (Image Quant LAS 4000).
Immunofluorescence
HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cells with different treatments were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature and blocked with 5% BSA for 30 min. Cells were incubated at temperature with E-cadherin (Proteintech, 1:200) and Vimentin antibody (Bioss, 1:100) at room temperature for 1 h. Then the cells were treated with secondary antibodies (YEASEN, 1:100) at room temperature for 1 h. The cells were washed twice with PBS and every time for 5 min in each step. Cell slides were sealed with anti-fluorescence quenching sealer with DAPI (YEASEN) and the fluorescence was detected with Laser scanning confocal microscope (ZEISS).
Scanning electron microscope (SEM)
HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cells with different treatments were fixed, dehydrated in gradient concentration of ethanol and dried with the gradient concentration of acetonitrile. Then cells were dried again by vacuum freeze dryer. Gold-plated cells were photographed through scanning electron microscopy (JEOL).
Wound healing assay
HepG2 or PLC/PRF/5 with different treatments were inoculated in wells for 12 h at 37 °C. The pipettor tips were used to remove part cells in each well. The floating cells were washed off with PBS and then serum-free medium was added. Immediately after, the wound was photographed, which was regarded as 0 h wound distance. After 24 and 48 h of cell culture, the wound was recorded. The migration of cells was analyzed by comparing the wound distance ratio at 0 h.
Invasion assay
Invasion assays were performed using transwell plates (8μm pore filter, Corning). HepG2 or PLC/PRF/5 cells with different treatments were seeded in top chamber inserts added with Matrigel (BD Biosciences). The upper chamber was added with 200 μL of the cell suspension (2 × 105 cells/mL) in serum-free medium. The bottom chamber was filled with 700 μL of medium containing 20% FBS. After 24 h of incubation, cells located on the lower surface of the chamber were fixed for 10 min with cool methanol. Then cells were stained with crystal violet for 10 min. After being cleaned with PBS, the cells were photographed under the microscope and counted using ImageJ software.
Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay
After transfection for 24 h, HepG2 or PLC/PRF/5 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate with a density of 2 × 103/mL in each well. Then cell medium (each well 100 μL) and CCK-8 reagent (Beyotime) were added to detect cell proliferation at 24, 48, and 72 h. The absorbance (A) was measured at 450 nm. Five parallel wells were set in each group, and the mean value was obtained. Cell survival rate was calculated using the following formula: cell survival rate (%) = (Aexperimental group/Acontrol group) × 100%.
Oil red staining
Cells with different treatment were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. Fresh-frozen tissue sections (8μm) were performed. All staining procedures were carried out according to Modified Oil Red O Staining Kit (Beyotime). Nucleus were stained with hematoxylin (Proteintech) 5 s. Samples were rinsed three times with PBS and photographed by Microscope (Olympus). Quantitative analysis was performed by ImageJ software.
BODIPY 493/503 staining
Cells with different treatment were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. After being cleaned with PBS, lipid droplets were stained by 5 μM BODIPY 493/503 (GLPBIO) for 30 min and visualized by Laser scanning confocal microscope (ZEISS). Quantitative analysis was performed by ImageJ Pro software.
Free cholesterol/cholesterol ester concentrations
Cells (5 × 106) or tissues (50 mg) were harvested and treated according to kit instructions. Free cholesterol concentrations were detected by Free Cholesterol (FC) Quantification Kit (Abbkine). Total cholesterol (TC) concentrations were detected by Total Cholesterol Quantification Kit (Abbkine). Cholesterol esters concentration was the difference between TC concentration and FC concentration.
Filipin III staining
Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min and incubated with 1.5 mg/mL Glycine for 30 min. Wash cells three times with PBS. Cells were incubated with 12.7 μM Filipin III (GLPBIO) for 2 h. The fluorescence was detected with Laser scanning confocal microscope (ZEISS).
Molecular docking
The 3D structure of SOAT1 was downloaded from the PDB database (PDB code 6VUM). The 3D structure of nootkatone (NK) was drawn by ChemDraw 2D 20.0 and transformed by Chem 3D. Molecular docking of nootkatone and SOAT1 protein was completed by AutoDockTools [36, 37]. The docking result was beautified through PyMOL.
Xenograft tumor model
Male BALB/c nude mice (5–6 weeks old) purchased from SPF (Beijing) Biotechnology Co., Ltd were randomly divided into Control, SOAT1, shSOAT1, NK, and SOAT1 + NK groups (n = 6 per group). Mice were subcutaneously injected with PLC, PLC-SOAT1, PLC-shSOAT1 cells (1 × 107). When the tumor size was up to 0.2 cm [3], the mice in NK and SOAT1 + NK group were given nootkatone (dissolved in 0.5% CMC-Na) by gavage at 200 mg/kg/day for 18 days. Other groups were given the same volume of 0.5% CMC-Na gastric irrigation. Tumor size was tested and calculated every 3 days according to the standard formula. All mice were sacrificed at the 28th day post inoculation, and the tumor tissues were collected, photographed, and weighted.
Pulmonary metastasis model
Male BALB/c nude mice (5–6 weeks old) were randomly divided into Control, SOAT1, shSOAT1, NK, and SOAT1 + NK groups (n = 6 per group). Mice were injected with PLC, PLC-SOAT1, PLC-shSOAT1 cells (2 × 106) via tail vein. The mice in NK and SOAT1 + NK groups were given nootkatone (dissolved in 0.5% CMC-Na) by gavage at 200 mg/kg for total 4 weeks. Other groups were given the same volume of 0.5% CMC-Na gastric irrigation. After eight weeks, lungs were collected, photographed and metastatic nodules were counted.
NAFLD-HCC model
Male C57BL/6J (2-week-old) mice were purchased from SPF (Beijing) Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Husbandry was conducted following standard guidelines. After the accommodation, mice were divided randomly into four groups (n = 6 per group): control group that fed with normal chow; model group that injected once a week with 25 mg/kg Diethylnitrosamine (DEN, N0258, Sigma) for 2 weeks and then fed with high-fat/high-cholesterol diet (HFHC, TP28522, containing 40% fat and 0.5% cholesterol), lasting 20 weeks. At 19 weeks of age, nootkatone (dissolved in 0.5% CMC-Na) was given by gavage at 100 mg/kg/day (NK-L group) and 200 mg/kg/day (NK-H group). At the same time, model group was given an equivalent volume of 0.5% CMC-Na. At 24 weeks of age, serum and liver tissue were obtained for further analysis. Moreover, part of liver was fixed in 10% neutral formalin for histological analysis. Animal studies were carried out according to the Guidelines of Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee, Tianjin University of Science and Technology.
Biochemical analysis
Contents of total cholesterol (TC) was quantified by commercial kits (Jiancheng Biotech). Serum AFP was detected with mouse-AFP ELISA kits (mlbio). The levels of hepatic free cholesterol (FC) and cholesterol ester (CE) were determined using FC Quantification Kit (Abbkine) and TC Quantification Kit (Abbkine).
Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in mice were detected by biochemical analyzer (Hitachi 7020).
Histological analysis
Frozen sections were stained with Oil red O to visualize lipid droplets. The fixed liver tissue embedded in paraffin were sliced (3μm). After dewaxing, tissue samples were stained with hematoxylin–eosin (H&E). Fibrosis was assessed by Sirius Red staining (G-CLONE). All slices were observed using a microscope (Olympus).
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining
Paraffin sections of liver tissue (3 μm) were dewaxed and rehydrated. After being blocked with 3% H2O2 for 10 min, sections were sealed with goat serum (Proteintech) for 20 min. Then sections were incubated with the following primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C: SOAT1 (BOSTER, 1:200), mouse anti-E-cadherin (Proteintech, 1:200), rabbit anti-Vimentin (Bioss, 1:400). The primary antibody in negative group was replaced by PBS. After washing, horseradish peroxidase-polymer anti-mouse/rabbit (Maixin Biotech) was added in all sections for 1 h at room temperature. Lastly, tissues were stained with 3,3’-diamino-benzidine-tetrahydrochloride and counterstained with hematoxylin (Maixin Biotech). All sections were observed with microscope (Olympus). The IHC score was calculated by multiplying the intensity (negative = 0, canary yellow = 1, claybank = 2, brown = 3) and the positive cell percentage scores (<25% = 1, 25–50% = 2, 51–75% = 3, >75% = 4).
Real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR
Total RNA in liver tissue was extracted by Trizol Reagent (TIANGEN Biotech) and converted into cDNA with Reverse Transcription Kit (TIANGEN Biotech). The method of RT-PCR was according to the manufacturer’s instructions and previously described protocol [38]. GAPDH expression was regarded as standard.
mRNA sequencing and bioinformation analysis
Total RNA was extracted, purified, and used to constructed cDNA libraries for sequencing with the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 sequencer at Shanghai Majorbio Bio-pharm Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Clean reads were separately aligned to mouse reference genomes by HISAT2. The raw count of genes in each sample were assembled by StringTie. The counts matrix was normalized by DESeq2. Cluster analysis, GO, KEGG, and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) were used to analyze gene expression and related pathways in each group.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed by GraphPad Prism 9.0 software (GraphPad Software, USA). Student’s t test was used to compare two groups of data. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare multiple groups of data. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare data including multiple groups with two or more variation. Data from each experiment were presented as the means ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and depicted as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Results
SOAT1 promotes the malignant progression of human HCC
We selected five GSE profiles about human HCC tissues (including tissues with NASH background) and normal or para-carcinoma tissue to analysis the differential gene and related pathway. A total of 378 up-regulated and 103 down-regulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were determined (Fig. 1A). GO enrichment analysis suggested that biological processes (cell migration, angiogenesis, EMT and lipid metabolism regulation), cellular components (cell surface, nucleus, cell junction and endoplasmic reticulum) and molecular functions (RNA binding, transcription factor binding and integrin binding) significantly enriched in HCC tissue (Fig. 1B). KEGG pathway analysis was correlated with lipid metabolism and tumor-related pathway (Fig. 1C). STRING could predict proteins interactions including direct (physical) and indirect (functional) interactions. STRING analysis was performed on DEGs. The results showed that some DEGs are related to lipid metabolism and tumor development (Fig. 1D). In depth, the results showed that tumor related and lipid metabolism-related genes such as cholesterol metabolism genes were increased, including SOAT1 (Fig. 1E). To further explore the clinicopathologically relevant feature of SOAT1, the LIHC data in the Human Protein Atlas and TCGA database was analyzed. The result showed that SOAT1 expression was higher in HCC tissues compared with normal liver tissue (Fig. 1F, G). Besides, SOAT1 expression level positively correlated with individual clinical stage (Fig. 1H) and pathological grade (Fig. 1I). The survival analysis showed that the high SOAT1 mRNA expression level was associated with the poor prognosis in HCC patients (Fig. 1J). We collected 22 cases of HCC tissues and detected SOAT1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The results showed that SOAT1 exhibited significant high expression in tissue with higher malignancy levels (Fig. 1K). Further analysis showed that the level of SOAT1 expression was positively correlated with the ES grade and MVI grade of HCC (Fig. 1L). Accordingly, these data demonstrated that SOAT1 expression was positively correlated with malignant process.
SOAT1 promotes the EMT in HCC
SOAT1 expression was observed in different HCC cell lines through CCLE public data analysis (Fig. 2A). The SOAT1 expression level was detected in HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cell lines by western blot (Fig. 2B). To evaluate the efficacy of SOAT1 expression on EMT, SOAT1 was overexpressed in HepG2 and knocked down in PLC/PRF/5. Western blot analysis revealed that SOAT1 remarkably increased Vimentin, Twist1, N-cadherin, Snail1, Slug, and Fibronectin, but decreased E-cadherin and Occludin expression in HepG2 cells, and the opposite results were observed in PLC/PRF/5 cells with SOAT1 knocked down (Fig. 2C). Immunofluorescence analysis suggested that E-cadherin expression was reduced, and Vimentin expression was increased in SOAT1-overexpressing HepG2 cells. Conversely, SOAT1 knockdown increased E-cadherin expression but decreased Vimentin expression (Fig. 2D). Besides, the influence of SOAT1 in cell phenotypes was observed through scanning electron microscopy. The pseudopodia of cellular surface were increased, and cell morphology changed from epithelial phenotype to mesenchymal phenotype in SOAT1-overexpressing cells and epithelioid phenotype was resumed after the SOAT1 knocked down (Fig. 2E). Moreover, overexpressed SOAT1 promoted cell migration and invasion, which was inhibited by SOAT1 knockdown (Fig. 2F, G). The cell proliferation of HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cells with SOAT1 overexpressed or knocked down was detected for 24, 48, and 72 h by CCK-8 assay. The results showed that SOAT1 overexpression promoted cell proliferation, whereas SOAT1 knockdown inhibit cell proliferation (Fig. 2H). These results demonstrated that SOAT1 promoted EMT in HCC cells.
SOAT1 induces EMT via regulating cholesterol metabolism
SOAT1 was an essential modulator of cholesterol esters formation. To further investigate how SOAT1 mediates EMT, lipid droplets were stained by Oil red O and BODIPY493/503. We observed that lipid droplets highly increased in SOAT1 overexpressed groups and decreased in SOAT1 silenced groups (Fig. 3A). Consistent results were acquired through BODIPY staining in HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cells with SOAT1 overexpressed or knocked down (Fig. 3B). The accumulation of cholesterol esters was observed in SOAT1-overexpressed cells, and cholesterol esters concentration decreased in SOAT1 knockdown cells (Fig. 3C). SOAT1 overexpression promoted cholesterol accumulation in plasmalemma, and SOAT1 knockdown contributed to the accumulation of intracellular cholesterol (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, we found that SOAT1 overexpression increased the expression level of SREBP2 and LDLR. Besides, the expression level of ITGB4 and ITGAV, integrin related to tumor metastasis, were also increased. The contrary results were obtained in SOAT1 knocked down cells (Fig. 3E). These results revealed that SOAT1 may promote EMT by regulating cholesterol level.
Nootkatone alleviates cholesterol metabolism disorder by targeting SOAT1
To investigate SOAT1 inhibitor, some compounds from Medicine Food Homology Compound Library were selected. Molecular docking analysis demonstrated that nootkatone displayed highest affinity with the catalytic pocket of SOAT1 protein (Fig. 4A). The detailed docking result of nootkatone and SOAT1 is shown in Fig. 4B. The results showed that nootkatone had close contact with His425, Tyr417, Met449, Val452, Phe453, and Asn487 of SOAT1, in which the carbonyl oxygen of nootkatone might form a hydrogen bond with His425 of SOAT1 (Fig. 4B). Nootkatone inhibited cell viability of HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cell lines (Fig. 4C). And, Nootkatone has no significant effect on the proliferation of normal liver cells (Fig. S1). To determine whether nootkatone is responsible for maintaining cholesterol homeostasis, HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cells were cultured in medium containing cholesterol (200 μg/mL) for 24 h and then treated with nootkatone (150 and 300 μM). The Oil red O and BODIPY493/503 staining results indicated that cholesterol promoted lipid accumulation in HCC cells, while nootkatone alleviated accumulation of lipid droplets induced by cholesterol (Fig. 4D, E). Cholesterol esters concentration markedly increased in the cholesterol-induced cells, which was reversed by nootkatone (Fig. 4F). Moreover, nootkatone decreased the effect of protein and mRNA expression level of SOAT1 mediated by cholesterol (Fig. 4G, H). Together, these results confirmed that nootkatone played a crucial role in regulating cholesterol metabolism via targeting SOAT1.
Nootkatone inhibits the EMT of HCC by targeting SOAT1
To further investigate whether nootkatone inhibits EMT by targeting SOAT1, rescue experiments were conducted. BODIPY493/503 staining results showed that nootkatone (300 μM) counteracted lipid droplets accumulation facilitated by SOAT1 (Fig. 5A), which was verified by the cholesterol esters content of cells in different groups (Fig. 5B). SOAT1 overexpression contributed to cholesterol accumulation in cell membrane. Nootkatone promoted intracellular cholesterol accumulation, which is similar to the result of SOAT1 knocked down. Also, nootkatone counteracted membrane cholesterol accumulation induced by SOAT1 overexpression (Fig. 5C). Nootkatone inhibited cell invasion and migration, and abolished the migration and invasion mediated by SOAT1 overexpression (Fig. 5D, E). IF analysis suggested that nootkatone decreased Vimentin and increased E-cadherin expression, and eliminates the effect of Vimentin and E-cadherin expression mediated by SOAT1 (Fig. 5F). SEM was used to observe the effect of nootkatone on cell morphology, and the results showed that nootkatone inhibited the mesenchymal phenotype of cells (Fig. 5G). Western blot analysis further proved that nootkatone eliminated the effect of SREBP2, LDLR, E-cadherin, Occludin, Vimentin, Twist1, N-cadherin, Snail1, Slug, and Fibronectin expression mediated by SOAT1 overexpression (Fig. 5H). Overall, these results demonstrated that nootkatone inhibited EMT by targeting SOAT1.
Nootkatone suppresses the oncogenic and metastatic effects of SOAT1 in vivo
To validate the oncogenic effects of SOAT1 in vivo, nude mice were subcutaneously implanted PLC/PRF/5 cells to establish xenograft model. Compared with the mice in Control group, SOAT1 promoted the tumor growth, and the opposite results were obtained after silencing SOAT1 expression. Nootkatone administration inhibited tumor growth and eliminated the stimulative roles of SOAT1 on tumor growth (Fig. 6A, B). Moreover, the protein expression of SOAT1, SREBP2, LDLR and EMT related markers in xenograft tumors were detected. The expression level of SREBP2, LDLR and mesenchymal markers (Vimentin, Twist1, N-cadherin, Snail1, Slug, and Fibronectin) were increased in SOAT1 overexpressed group and decreased in SOAT1 silenced group, whereas the E-cadherin and Occludin showed the contrary trend. Nootkatone restored the up-regulation of SREBP2, LDLR, Vimentin, Twist1, N-cadherin, Snail1, Slug, and Fibronectin and down-regulation of E-cadherin and Occludin induced by SOAT1 (Fig. 6C). The results of lung metastasis experiments showed that the number of lung metastatic nodules increased in mice injected with SOAT1 overexpressed PLC cells, whereas decreased in mice of shSOAT1 and NK groups. Nootkatone administration reduced the effect of SOAT1 on lung metastatic nodules (Fig. 6D). These results manifested that SOAT1 played oncogenic and metastatic role in HCC, which was suppressed by nootkatone treatment.
Nootkatone suppresses tumorigenesis and development of NAFLD-HCC mice
Classical mice model of NAFLD-HCC induced by DEN injection and HFHC feeding was established to verify that nootkatone inhibits EMT by targeting SOAT1 in NAFLD-HCC mice (Fig. 7A). The respective liver macroscopic suggested that compared to the control group, liver of model group mice displayed uneven surface and tumor nodules (yellow arrow), indicating that NAFLD-HCC model was successfully conducted. Nootkatone obviously improved HFHC + DEN-induced NAFLD-HCC in mice (Fig. 7B). Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) is one of the most widely accepted detection markers of HCC. The results of AFP detection in serum and liver tissue showed that the liver of the model group mice underwent carcinogenesis, and nootkatone administration reduced AFP levels (Fig. 7C). Besides, mice in model group displayed enhanced body weight, liver weight, and liver-to-body weight ratio (LW/BW ratio), which were improved by nootkatone (Fig. 7D–F). Serum total cholesterol was significantly increased in model mice, which were recovered by nootkatone treatment (Fig. 7G). In parallel, hepatic free cholesterol and cholesterol ester content were increased in model mice, whereas nootkatone significantly reduced the accumulation of hepatic free cholesterol and cholesterol esters (Fig. 7H). Serum ALT and AST levels were significantly increased in model mice compared with that in control group, which were decreased by nootkatone supplementation (Fig. 7I). Lipid accumulation in liver was evaluated through Oil red O staining. The wide distribution of large lipid droplets was observed in liver of model mice, whereas nootkatone administration decreased lipid droplets distribution in liver. H&E staining results showed that DEN + HFHC-feeding resulted in balloon-like structures and lipid deposition in liver tissue. Notably, nootkatone supplementation effectively decreased the hepatocellular ballooning and lipid deposition in liver. Moreover, model mice exhibited fibrotic injury with increased collagen distribution, while nootkatone reduced hepatic collagen deposition to ameliorate liver fibrosis (Fig. 7J). Furthermore, the expression of SOAT1, SREBP2, LDLR and Vimentin, Twist1, N-cadherin, Snail1, Slug, and Fibronectin was increased, while E-cadherin and Occludin expression was decreased in liver tissues of model mice. Nootkatone markedly reversed the expression in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7K). IHC staining results suggested that compared with the control group, reduced E-cadherin and increased vimentin expression were observed in liver of model mice, while nootkatone administration reversed their expression (Fig. S2). These results indicate that the trend of NAFLD to HCC transition induced by DEN + HFHC significantly increases SOAT1 expression in liver tissue, resulting in the disruption of cholesterol homeostasis, and nootkatone can alleviate liver lesions.
To further explore the effects of nootkatone on cholesterol metabolism and oncogenesis in the progression of NAFLD to HCC, mRNA-Seq was performed with liver tissue of NAFLD-HCC mice. The differently expression genes (DEGs) in Control, Model and NK group are represented in Fig. 8A. GO analyzed the DGEs between every two groups (Model vs Control and NK vs Model). In Model vs Control group, lipid metabolism related function (sterol synthetic, cholesterol biosynthetic process, and lipid localization) and tumor-related process (collagen fibril organization, cell matrix adhesion, growth factor binding, and extracellular matrix) obviously enriched (Fig. 8B). Nootkatone specially regulated lipid metabolism (response to fatty acid, lipid biosynthetic process and lipid metabolic process), tumor-related process (extracellular matrix, actin cytoskeleton, and growth factor binding) and immune response (B cell activation, leukocyte differentiation and immune effector process) (Fig. 8C). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis indicated that DEGs in Model vs Control group enriched in protein digestion and absorption, lipid metabolism related pathway (fat digestion and absorption, steroid biosynthesis) and tumorigenesis and development related pathway (PPAR signaling pathway, focal adhesion and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway) (Fig. 8D). It is noteworthy that the DGEs in NK vs Model group enriched in pathways including HCC, pathways in cancer, drug resistance and metabolism (Fig. 8E). Moreover, GSEA results suggested that DEN + HFHC induction accelerated lipid and atherosclerosis, lipid storage, NAFLD, and TNF signaling pathway (Fig. 8F). Nootkatone suppressed cholesterol metabolism, lipid biosynthetic process, HCC, and TNF signaling pathway (Fig. 8G). In detail, the upregulated and downregulated lipid metabolism related genes were analyzed, and nootkatone effectively maintained lipid metabolism homeostasis (Fig. 8H). In addition, DEN + HFHC-fed resulted in the increased expression of representative genes related to tumorigenesis and development, whereas nootkatone administration inhibited tumor-related genes expression (Fig. 8I). In order to verify the mRNA sequencing results, we verified the expression of cholesterol metabolism-related genes and tumor-related genes in the liver tissue of the Control, Model, NK-L, and NK-H groups by qRT-PCR. Compared with the Control group, the mRNA expression of Srebf2, Scap, Hmgcr, Soat1, Npc1, Snai3, Twist1, Itgav, Vegfc, and Tgfbr1 has higher expression in model group, indicating that there is lipid metabolism disorder in model mice. Nootkatone administration could inhibited the mRNA expression to maintain lipid metabolism homeostasis (Fig. S3). Taken together, these results demonstrated that DEN + HFHC drove the process of NAFLD-HCC, while nootkatone could inhibit the process.
Discussion
EMT is a critical process contributing to cancer progression and metastasis [39]. Increasing studies suggest that EMT is inextricably linked to cholesterol metabolism [4, 40]. SOAT1, a key cholesterol esterification enzyme, can transform supernumerary intracellular cholesterol into cholesterol esters storing in lipid droplets. Previous study has found that SOAT1 is a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target for HCC [30]. Tumor suppressor P53 represses ubiquitin-specific peptidase 19 (USP19) which deubiquitinate and stabilize SOAT1, thereby inhibiting hepatocarcinogenesis [41]. However, the underlying mechanism that SOAT1 promotes EMT is unclear in HCC. In this study, TCGA database and clinical specimen information analysis showed that high SOAT1 expression is a risk factor for survival of HCC patients. In vitro, we found that SOAT1 decreased the expression of epithelium protein marker (E-cadherin and Occludin) and increased the expression of mesenchymal protein (Vimentin, Twist1, N-cadherin, Snail1, Slug, and Fibronectin), promoting invasion and migration of HCC cells. Of note, SOAT2 shares high homologous to SOAT1 [42] but has lower expression in HCC than normal liver tissues, which needs further research.
Abnormal cholesterol metabolism accelerated the development of HCC. SREBP2, is a master transcriptional regulator of cholesterol biosynthesis pathway [43]. SCAP could regulated SREBP2 from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by sensing and responding to ER cholesterol fluctuations [44]. When SOAT1 were overexpressed, ER membrane cholesterol is depleted, the SCAP-SREBP2 complex is sorted into COPII vesicles and moves from the ER to the Golgi for proteolytic activation of SREBP2, promoting the expression of LDLR which related to cholesterol uptake [10]. In previous studies, cholesterol synthesis mediated by SREBP2 promotes the caveolin-dependent endocytosis of integrin β1, contributing to pathological angiogenesis [45]. Besides, the cholesterol level of the plasma membrane regulates receptors on the plasma membrane, including integrins [46, 47]. Targeting cholesterol/lipid raft/integrin β3/FAK pathway overcomes EMT-associated drug resistance [48]. In our study, the results indicated that SOAT1 overexpression promoted the accumulation of lipid droplets and cholesterol esters. Moreover, SOAT1 overexpression promoted cholesterol synthesis and uptake, accelerating the accumulation of cholesterol in plasma membrane, which enhanced the integrins (ITGAV and ITGB4) expression. When SOAT1 was knocked down, the process of cholesterol into cholesterol ester was blocked, leading to intracellular cholesterol accumulation. The xenograft tumor and lung metastasis model in vivo revealed that SOAT1 accelerated tumor growth and metastasis.
NAFLD is closely linked to HCC development [49]. Cholesterol or dietary cholesterol facilitates hepatocarcinogenesis [50, 51]. Increased serum lipid level and hepatic steatosis are remarkable characteristic of NAFLD [52]. AFP, as a serum biomarker and tumor antigen, is the most widely accepted detection indicator in HCC [53]. Hepatic free cholesterol and cholesterol ester accumulation is another feature in HCC [14, 41]. We conducted NAFLD-HCC mice model to determine the mechanism that SOAT1 induced hepatocarcinogenesis. DEN + HFHC feeding resulted in tumor nodules and high level of AFP in serum and liver. Moreover, SOAT1 and mesenchymal markers were highly expressed in model mice, while epithelium markers were decreased. Besides, abnormal cholesterol metabolism was observed in NAFLD-HCC mice, which was presented as increased cholesterol level in serum and liver tissue, increased lipid droplets accumulation, higher protein and mRNA expression of cholesterol metabolism-related genes. These data demonstrated that SOAT1 was involved in the process of tumor occurrence.
Notably, despite cholesterol metabolism is a frequent pathway for the antitumor drugs, there are no specific targets and drugs for clinical use. Previous study indicated that SOAT1 exhibits high expression in the S-III subtype of HCC, and knocked down SOAT1 inhibit tumor development [46]. Currently, some SOAT1 inhibitors have been found, including avasmibe [7], pactimibe [54], PD-122301 (nevanimibe) [42], and CI-976 [55]. Nootkatone, a natural sesquiterpene ketone, was extracted from grapefruit peel. Previews studies have confirmed that nootkatone ameliorates liver fibrosis and inhibits tumor cells proliferation, such colorectal cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer [27,28,29]. However, the therapeutic effect of nootkatone on HCC has not been reported. The molecular docking results showed that the binding site between nootkatone and SOAT1 (His425, Tyr417, Met449, Val452, Phe453, Asn487 residues) is close to the binding site between Oleoyl-CoA, a cholesterol esterified substrate, and the cytosolic tunnel TM7 of SOAT1. Therefore, we speculate that nootkatone, as a possible competitive inhibitor, might inhibit SOAT1 activity by hindering the loading of substrate into the catalytic center. The binding mechanism between nootkatone and SOAT1 needs further exploration. We further investigated that nootkatone inhibited EMT by targeting SOAT1-induced cholesterol metabolism in vitro. In addition, nootkatone treatment significantly inhibited the xenograft tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis via targeting SOAT1. Moreover, nootkatone supplementation reduced the expression of SOAT1, alleviated hepatic steatosis and pathological injuries damage, which suppressed tumorigenesis and development of NAFLD-HCC. So, we hold that nootkatone might inhibit EMT by targeting SOAT1.
Our studies confirmed that SOAT1 accelerated the EMT procession of HCC by regulating cholesterol metabolism in vitro and in vivo. Nootkatone, a natural medicine food homology compound, inhibited EMT via targeting SOAT1. These findings reveal that SOAT1 is a potential anti-tumor metastasis target in HCC, providing the reference for targeted cholesterol metabolism to cure HCC. Importantly, our investigation provides new insights into the anti-cancer mechanism of sesquiterpene and demonstrates that the natural compound nootkatone might be valuable as a potential drug for cancer therapy.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from this manuscript and the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Han J, Meng J, Chen S, Wang X, Yin S, Zhang Q, et al. YY1 complex promotes quaking expression via super-enhancer binding during EMT of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2019;79:1451–64.
Behary J, Amorim N, Jiang XT, Raposo A, Gong L, McGovern E, et al. Gut microbiota impact on the peripheral immune response in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease related hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2021;12:187.
Snaebjornsson MT, Janaki-Raman S, Schulze A. Greasing the wheels of the cancer machine: the role of lipid metabolism in cancer. Cell Metab. 2020;31:62–76.
Jiang S, Wang X, Song D, Liu X, Gu Y, Xu Z, et al. Cholesterol induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of prostate cancer cells by suppressing degradation of EGFR through APMAP. Cancer Res. 2019;79:3063–75.
Brabletz S, Schuhwerk H, Brabletz T, Stemmler MP. Dynamic EMT: a multi-tool for tumor progression. EMBO J. 2021;40:e108647.
Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2018;391:1301–14.
Maluccio M, Covey A. Recent progress in understanding, diagnosing, and treating hepatocellular carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:394–9.
Li X, Zhou Y, Hu J, Bai Z, Meng W, Zhang L, et al. Loss of neuropilin1 inhibits liver cancer stem cells population and blocks metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma via epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Neoplasma. 2021;68:325–33.
Jia L, Li J, Li P, Liu D, Li J, Shen J, et al. Site-specific glycoproteomic analysis revealing increased core-fucosylation on FOLR1 enhances folate uptake capacity of HCC cells to promote EMT. Theranostics. 2021;11:6905–21.
Luo J, Yang H, Song BL. Mechanisms and regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:225–45.
Che L, Chi W, Qiao Y, Zhang J, Song X, Liu Y, et al. Cholesterol biosynthesis supports the growth of hepatocarcinoma lesions depleted of fatty acid synthase in mice and humans. Gut. 2020;69:177–86.
Garcia-Bermudez J, Baudrier L, Bayraktar EC, Shen Y, La K, Guarecuco R, et al. Squalene accumulation in cholesterol auxotrophic lymphomas prevents oxidative cell death. Nature. 2019;567:118–22.
Liu D, Wong CC, Fu L, Chen H, Zhao L, Li C, et al. Squalene epoxidase drives NAFLD-induced hepatocellular carcinoma and is a pharmaceutical target. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaap9840.
Zhang X, Coker OO, Chu ES, Fu K, Lau HCH, Wang YX, et al. Dietary cholesterol drives fatty liver-associated liver cancer by modulating gut microbiota and metabolites. Gut. 2021;70:761–74.
Montero J, Morales A, Llacuna L, Lluis JM, Terrones O, Basanez G, et al. Mitochondrial cholesterol contributes to chemotherapy resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2008;68:5246–56.
Guertin DA, Wellen KE. Acetyl-CoA metabolism in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2023;23:156–72.
Li K, Zhang J, Lyu H, Yang J, Wei W, Wang Y, et al. CSN6-SPOP-HMGCS1 axis promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression via YAP1 activation. Adv Sci. 2024;11:e2306827.
Liu F, Tian T, Zhang Z, Xie S, Yang J, Zhu L, et al. Publisher Correction: Long non-coding RNA SNHG6 couples cholesterol sensing with mTORC1 activation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Metab. 2022;4:1215.
Tang W, Zhou J, Yang W, Feng Y, Wu H, Mok MTS, et al. Aberrant cholesterol metabolic signaling impairs antitumor immunosurveillance through natural killer T cell dysfunction in obese liver. Cell Mol Immunol. 2022;19:834–47.
Qian H, Zhao X, Yan R, Yao X, Gao S, Sun X, et al. Structural basis for catalysis and substrate specificity of human ACAT1. Nature. 2020;581:333–8.
Geng F, Cheng X, Wu X, Yoo JY, Cheng C, Guo JY, et al. Inhibition of SOAT1 suppresses glioblastoma growth via blocking SREBP-1-mediated lipogenesis. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:5337–48.
Oni TE, Biffi G, Baker LA, Hao Y, Tonelli C, Somerville TDD, et al. SOAT1 promotes mevalonate pathway dependency in pancreatic cancer. J Exp Med. 2020;217:e20192389.
Xu H, Xia H, Zhou S, Tang Q, Bi F. Cholesterol activates the Wnt/PCP-YAP signaling in SOAT1-targeted treatment of colon cancer. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7:38.
Zhu T, Wang Z, Zou T, Xu L, Zhang S, Chen Y, et al. SOAT1 promotes gastric cancer lymph node metastasis through lipid synthesis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:769647.
El-Baba C, Baassiri A, Kiriako G, Dia B, Fadlallah S, Moodad S, et al. Terpenoids’ anti-cancer effects: focus on autophagy. Apoptosis. 2021;26:491–511.
Qi Y, Cheng X, Gong G, Yan T, Du Y, Wu B, et al. Synergistic neuroprotective effect of schisandrin and nootkatone on regulating inflammation, apoptosis and autophagy via the PI3K/AKT pathway. Food Funct. 2020;11:2427–38.
Yoo E, Lee J, Lertpatipanpong P, Ryu J, Kim CT, Park EY, et al. Anti-proliferative activity of A. oxyphylla and its bioactive constituent nootkatone in colorectal cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:881.
Hung LVM, Moon JY, Ryu JY, Cho SK. Nootkatone, an AMPK activator derived from grapefruit, inhibits KRAS downstream pathway and sensitizes non-small-cell lung cancer A549 cells to adriamycin. Phytomedicine. 2019;63:153000.
Kurdi A, Hassan K, Venkataraman B, Rajesh M. Nootkatone confers hepatoprotective and anti-fibrotic actions in a murine model of liver fibrosis by suppressing oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2018;32:e22017.
Jiang Y, Sun A, Zhao Y, Ying W, Sun H, Yang X, et al. Proteomics identifies new therapeutic targets of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature. 2019;567:257–61.
Ye J, Li TS, Xu G, Zhao YM, Zhang NP, Fan J, et al. JCAD promotes progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis to liver cancer by inhibiting LATS2 kinase activity. Cancer Res. 2017;77:5287–300.
Pinyol R, Torrecilla S, Wang H, Montironi C, Pique-Gili M, Torres-Martin M, et al. Molecular characterisation of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J Hepatol. 2021;75:865–78.
Neumann O, Kesselmeier M, Geffers R, Pellegrino R, Radlwimmer B, Hoffmann K, et al. Methylome analysis and integrative profiling of human HCCs identify novel protumorigenic factors. Hepatology. 2012;56:1817–27.
Roessler S, Jia HL, Budhu A, Forgues M, Ye QH, Lee JS, et al. A unique metastasis gene signature enables prediction of tumor relapse in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Res. 2010;70:10202–12.
Huang Y, Chen HC, Chiang CW, Yeh CT, Chen SJ, Chou CK. Identification of a two-layer regulatory network of proliferation-related microRNAs in hepatoma cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:10478–93.
Eberhardt J, Santos-Martins D, Tillack AF, Forli S. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: new docking methods, expanded force field, and Python bindings. J Chem Inf Model. 2021;61:3891–8.
Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31:455–61.
Tong L, Hao H, Zhang Z, Lv Y, Liang X, Liu Q, et al. Milk-derived extracellular vesicles alleviate ulcerative colitis by regulating the gut immunity and reshaping the gut microbiota. Theranostics. 2021;11:8570–86.
Lamouille S, Xu J, Derynck R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:178–96.
Kartal-Yandim M, Adan-Gokbulut A, Baran Y. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance and its reversal in cancer. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36:716–26.
Zhu Y, Gu L, Lin X, Zhou X, Lu B, Liu C, et al. P53 deficiency affects cholesterol esterification to exacerbate hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatology. 2022;77:1499–511.
Long T, Sun Y, Hassan A, Qi X, Li X. Structure of nevanimibe-bound tetrameric human ACAT1. Nature. 2020;581:339–43.
Cheng C, Geng F, Cheng X, Guo D. Lipid metabolism reprogramming and its potential targets in cancer. Cancer Commun. 2018;38:27.
Brown MS, Radhakrishnan A, Goldstein JL. Retrospective on cholesterol homeostasis: the central role of Scap. Annu Rev Biochem. 2018;87:783–807.
Ariano C, Riganti C, Cora D, Valdembri D, Mana G, Astanina E, et al. TFEB controls integrin-mediated endothelial cell adhesion by the regulation of cholesterol metabolism. Angiogenesis. 2022;25:471–92.
Pande G. The role of membrane lipids in regulation of integrin functions. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12:569–74.
Shimano H, Sato R. SREBP-regulated lipid metabolism: convergent physiology - divergent pathophysiology. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13:710–30.
Jin H, He Y, Zhao P, Hu Y, Tao J, Chen J, et al. Targeting lipid metabolism to overcome EMT-associated drug resistance via integrin beta3/FAK pathway and tumor-associated macrophage repolarization using legumain-activatable delivery. Theranostics. 2019;9:265–78.
White DL, Kanwal F, El-Serag HB. Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and risk for hepatocellular cancer, based on systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:1342–59.e2.
Liang JQ, Teoh N, Xu L, Pok S, Li X, Chu ESH, et al. Dietary cholesterol promotes steatohepatitis related hepatocellular carcinoma through dysregulated metabolism and calcium signaling. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4490.
Liu F, Tian T, Zhang Z, Xie S, Yang J, Zhu L, et al. Long non-coding RNA SNHG6 couples cholesterol sensing with mTORC1 activation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Metab. 2022;4:1022–40.
Li S, You J, Wang Z, Liu Y, Wang B, Du M, et al. Curcumin alleviates high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis and obesity in association with modulation of gut microbiota in mice. Food Res Int. 2021;143:110270.
Galle PR, Foerster F, Kudo M, Chan SL, Llovet JM, Qin S, et al. Biology and significance of alpha-fetoprotein in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2019;39:2214–29.
Yoshinaka Y, Shibata H, Kobayashi H, Kuriyama H, Shibuya K, Tanabe S, et al. A selective ACAT-1 inhibitor, K-604, stimulates collagen production in cultured smooth muscle cells and alters plaque phenotype in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Atherosclerosis. 2010;213:85–91.
Guan C, Niu Y, Chen SC, Kang Y, Wu JX, Nishi K, et al. Structural insights into the inhibition mechanism of human sterol O-acyltransferase 1 by a competitive inhibitor. Nat Commun. 2020;11:2478.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 82072709, 81902441), Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin Municipal (23JCYBJC00850), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M712374), Tianjin “131” Innovative Talent Team Project [201926].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MJ and FR designed the study. FR conducted experiments and collected and analyzed data. XW, LJ, LX, and WL assisted with cell and animal experiments. XW assisted with bioinformatics analysis. FR and LJ analyzed and interpreted data. ZJ assisted with pathological tissue analysis. MJ and ZM arranged subject ideas and provided theoretical, technical guidance and financial support.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin University of Science and Technology and Liaocheng People’s Hospital. The sample collection has obtained informed consent from all participants. All mice experiments were performed according to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees, and have been reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethical and Welfare Committee.
Consent for publication
All authors agreed on the publication of the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by Cristina Munoz-Pinedo
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, R., Xue, W., Liang, J. et al. SOAT1 regulates cholesterol metabolism to induce EMT in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis 15, 325 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06711-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-024-06711-9