Abstract
Aqueous batteries—with water-based electrolytes—provide safe, reliable and affordable energy storage solutions. However, their energy density and cycling life remain uncompetitive owing to the narrow electrochemical window of the aqueous electrolyte. Adding excessive salt to form saturated electrolytes could address this limitation but at other costs. Here we show a water-in-polymer electrolyte that maximizes the amount of water but works across a voltage range as wide as that for highly concentrated electrolytes. At the heart of this formulation is the introduction of a polyacrylamide network that serves to immobilize and thus tame the otherwise reactive H2O molecules. As a result, our polymerized solid aqueous electrolytes with 4.1 m (18 wt% H2O) and 7.6 m (11 wt% H2O) lithium bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide (LiTFSI) salt show extended electrochemical windows of 2.7 V and 3.7 V, comparable to those for the 21 m and 40 m saturated counterparts, respectively. The solid-state Li4Ti5O12//LiMn2O4 cell exhibits stable cycling even under a higher loading of cathode (16 mg cm−2) with a lean electrolyte of 7 g Ah−1. In addition, up to 80% of the LiTFSI salt can be recycled and the polymer matrix can also be regenerated. Our electrolyte design represents a substantial step forwards towards more sustainable aqueous batteries.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Crystallographic data for the structures reported in this study have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, under deposition numbers CCDC 2220988 and 2245674. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge via https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures/. All other relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available in this Article and Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Armand, M. & Tarascon, J. M. Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008).
Liu, K., Liu, Y. Y., Lin, D. C., Pei, A. & Cui, Y. Materials for lithium-ion battery safety. Sci. Adv. 4, eaas9820 (2018).
Bauer, C. et al. Charging sustainable batteries. Nat. Sustain. 5, 176–178 (2022).
Kim, H. et al. Aqueous rechargeable Li and Na ion batteries. Chem. Rev. 114, 11788–11827 (2014).
Liu, Z. et al. Voltage issue of aqueous rechargeable metal-ion batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 180–232 (2020).
Wald Cresce, A. & Xu, K. Aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Carbon Energy 3, 721–751 (2021).
Suo, L., Hu, Y.-S., Li, H., Armand, M. & Chen, L. A new class of solvent-in-salt electrolyte for high-energy rechargeable metallic lithium batteries. Nat. Commun. 4, 1481 (2013).
Suo, L. M. et al. “Water-in-salt” electrolyte enables high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion chemistries. Science 350, 938–943 (2015).
Borodin, O., Self, J., Persson, K. A., Wang, C. & Xu, K. Uncharted waters: super-concentrated electrolytes. Joule 4, 69–100 (2020).
Suo, L. et al. Advanced high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion battery enabled by “water-in-bisalt” electrolyte. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 7136–7141 (2016).
Chen, L. et al. A 63 m superconcentrated aqueous electrolyte for high-energy Li-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 968–974 (2020).
Yamada, Y. et al. Hydrate–melt electrolytes for high-energy-density aqueous batteries. Nat. Energy 1, 16129 (2016).
Yang, C. et al. 4.0 V aqueous Li-ion batteries. Joule 1, 122–132 (2017).
Xie, J., Liang, Z. & Lu, Y.-C. Molecular crowding electrolytes for high-voltage aqueous batteries. Nat. Mater. 19, 1006–1011 (2020).
Wang, F. et al. Hybrid aqueous/non-aqueous electrolyte for safe and high-energy Li-ion batteries. Joule 2, 927–937 (2018).
Chen, J. et al. Improving electrochemical stability and low-temperature performance with water/acetonitrile hybrid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1902654 (2020).
Shang, Y. et al. An “ether-in-water” electrolyte boosts stable interfacial chemistry for aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 32, 2004017 (2020).
Wang, Y. et al. A green asymmetric bicyclic co-solvent molecule for high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202311009 (2024).
Zhang, J. et al. “Water-in-salt” polymer electrolyte for Li-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 2878–2887 (2020).
Hou, X. et al. Stabilizing the solid–electrolyte interphase with polyacrylamide for high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 60, 22812–22817 (2021).
Dong, D., Xie, J., Liang, Z. & Lu, Y.-C. Tuning intermolecular interactions of molecular crowding electrolyte for high-performance aqueous batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 123–130 (2022).
Hou, X. et al. “Water-in-eutectogel” electrolytes for quasi-solid-state aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2200401 (2022).
Suo, L. et al. How solid–electrolyte interphase forms in aqueous electrolytes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 18670–18680 (2017).
Wang, F. et al. Spinel LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 cathode for high-energy aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1600922 (2017).
Li, Q. et al. Controlling intermolecular interaction and interphase chemistry enabled sustainable water-tolerance LiMn2O4||Li4Ti5O12 batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 61, e202214126 (2022).
Zhou, L. et al. Suppressing hydrogen evolution in aqueous lithium-ion batteries with double-site hydrogen bonding. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 40–47 (2023).
Wang, Y. et al. Enabling high-energy-density aqueous batteries with hydrogen bond-anchored electrolytes. Matter 5, 162–179 (2022).
He, X. et al. Fluorine-free water-in-ionomer electrolytes for sustainable lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 9, 5320 (2018).
Wang, F. et al. Stabilizing high voltage LiCoO2 cathode in aqueous electrolyte with interphase-forming additive. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3666–3673 (2016).
Zeng, Z. et al. Non-flammable electrolytes with high salt-to-solvent ratios for Li-ion and Li-metal batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 674–681 (2018).
Jaumaux, P. et al. Localized water-in-salt electrolyte for aqueous lithium-ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 60, 19965–19973 (2021).
Dubouis, N. et al. The role of the hydrogen evolution reaction in the solid–electrolyte interphase formation mechanism for “water-in-salt” electrolytes. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 3491–3499 (2018).
Chodkiewicz, M. L. et al. Accurate crystal structure of ice VI from X-ray diffraction with Hirshfeld atom refinement. IUCrJ 9, 573–579 (2022).
Allen, M. P. & Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids (Oxford Univ. Press, 1987).
Huang, S., Hou, L., Li, T., Jiao, Y. & Wu, P. Antifreezing hydrogel electrolyte with ternary hydrogen bonding for high-performance zinc-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, 2110140 (2022).
Wu, J., Lin, W., Wang, Z., Chen, S. & Chang, Y. Investigation of the hydration of nonfouling material poly(sulfobetaine methacrylate) by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance. Langmuir 28, 7436–7441 (2012).
Hou, Z. et al. Formation of solid–electrolyte interfaces in aqueous electrolytes by altering cation-solvation shell structure. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1903665 (2020).
Li, P. et al. Efficiencies of various in situ polymerizations of liquid electrolytes and the practical implications for quasi solid-state batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 62, e202309613 (2023).
Ye, T. et al. A tissue-like soft all-hydrogel battery. Adv. Mater. 34, 2105120 (2022).
Suo, L. et al. “Water-in-salt” electrolytes enable green and safe Li-ion batteries for large scale electric energy storage applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 6639–6644 (2016).
Sun, H. et al. Fluorinated poly-oxalate electrolytes stabilizing both anode and cathode interfaces for all-solid-state Li/NMC811 batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 60, 18335–18343 (2021).
Xu, J. et al. Aqueous electrolyte design for super-stable 2.5 V LiMn2O4||Li4Ti5O12 pouch cells. Nat. Energy 7, 186–193 (2022).
Xie, X. et al. Influencing factors on Li-ion conductivity and interfacial stability of solid polymer electrolytes, exampled by polycarbonates, polyoxalates and polymalonates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 62, e202218229 (2023).
Yang, S. J. et al. Thermally stable polymer-rich solid electrolyte interphase for safe lithium metal pouch cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 61, e202214545 (2022).
Yang, C. et al. Flexible aqueous Li-ion battery with high energy and power densities. Adv. Mater. 29, 1701972 (2017).
Jiao, M. et al. A polarized gel electrolyte for wide-temperature flexible zinc-air batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 62, e202301114 (2023).
Wang, F., Lin, C.-F., Ji, X., Rubloff, G. W. & Wang, C. Suppression of hydrogen evolution at catalytic surfaces in aqueous lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 14921–14926 (2020).
Lin, R., Ke, C., Chen, J., Liu, S. & Wang, J. Asymmetric donor–acceptor molecule-regulated core-shell-solvation electrolyte for high-voltage aqueous batteries. Joule 6, 399–417 (2022).
Ma, Z. et al. Expanding the low-temperature and high-voltage limits of aqueous lithium-ion battery. Energy Storage Mater. 45, 903–910 (2022).
Becker, M. et al. The hydrotropic effect of ionic liquids in water-in-salt electrolytes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 60, 14100–14108 (2021).
Zhu, J. et al. The influences of DMF content in composite polymer electrolytes on Li+-conductivity and interfacial stability with Li-metal. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2301165 (2023).
Li, W. et al. Thermally depolymerizable polyether electrolytes for convenient and low-cost recycling of LiTFSI. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 61, e202209169 (2022).
Ciez, R. E. & Whitacre, J. F. Examining different recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Sustain. 2, 148–156 (2019).
Wang, J. et al. Sustainable upcycling of spent LiCoO2 to an ultra-stable battery cathode at high voltage. Nat. Sustain. 6, 797–805 (2023).
Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09, Revision D.01 (Gaussian Inc., 2009).
Becke, A. D. Density‐functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648–5652 (1993).
Lee, C., Yang, W. & Parr, R. G. Development of the Colle–Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988).
Goerigk, L. & Grimme, S. Efficient and accurate double-hybrid-meta-GGA density functionals-evaluation with the extended GMTKN30 database for general main group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 291–309 (2011).
Weigend, F. & Ahlrichs, R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 3297–3305 (2005).
Merrick, J. P., Moran, D. & Radom, L. An evaluation of harmonic vibrational frequency scale factors. J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 11683–11700 (2007).
Lu, T. & Chen, Q. Shermo: a general code for calculating molecular thermochemistry properties. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1200, 113249 (2021).
Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2, 19–25 (2015).
Kaminski, G. A., Friesner, R. A., Tirado-Rives, J. & Jorgensen, W. L. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 6474–6487 (2001).
Bayly, C. I., Cieplak, P., Cornell, W. D. & Kollman, P. A. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 10269–10280 (1993).
Lu, T. & Chen, F. Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580–592 (2012).
Chen, F. & Forsyth, M. Elucidation of transport mechanism and enhanced alkali ion transference numbers in mixed alkali metal–organic ionic molten salts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 19336–19344 (2016).
Chaban, V. V. & Voroshylova, L. V. Systematic refinement of Canongia Lopes-Pádua force field for pyrrolidinium-based ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 6242–6249 (2015).
Martínez, L., Andrade, R., Birgin, E. G. & Martínez, J. M. PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2157–2164 (2009).
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).
Buch, V. Growth and structure of amorphous ice condensates: a computational study. II. J. Chem. Phys. 96, 3814–3823 (1992).
Sato, H. & Hirata, F. Ab initio study of water. II. Liquid structure, electronic and thermodynamic properties over a wide range of temperature and density. J. Chem. Phys. 111, 8545–8555 (1999).
Buch, V. Molecular structure and OH-stretch spectra of liquid water surface. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 17771–17774 (2005).
Prada-Gracia, D., Shevchuk, R. & Rao, F. The quest for self-consistency in hydrogen bond definitions. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 084501 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work is financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFE0202400, 2022YFA1204500 and 2022YFA1204501 to W.Z.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21875016, 22179004 and 22261160570 to W.Z., and 22209009 to S.-M.H.) and the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (2212014 and L223008 to W.Z.). We acknowledge the valuable suggestions from the late J. B. Goodenough of the University of Texas at Austin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
W.Z. designed this study. S.-M.H., J.Z., S.H. and L.M. performed the experiments and analysed the experimental results. S.H. performed the theoretical calculations. W.Z. and L.Z. wrote the paper. W.L., Y.Z., X.X., X.Q., X.F. and H.L. supported the experiments and data analysis.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Sustainability thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Figs. 1–39 and Supplementary Tables 1–3.
Supplementary Video 1
The solid-state aqueous pouch cell under folding and cutting.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 1
Electrochemical window results.
Source Data Fig. 2
Simulation results of the interaction of H2O with Li+ and PAM.
Source Data Fig. 3
Simulation and experimental study on hydrogen bonds and Li+–O interaction.
Source Data Fig. 4
Electrochemical performance of WIPSEs and FWIPSEs in solid-state aqueous Mo6S8//LiMn2O4 and Li4Ti5O12//LiMn2O4 cells.
Source Data Fig. 5
Recycling of LiTFSI from FWIPSEs and regeneration of FWIPSEs.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hao, SM., Zhu, J., He, S. et al. Water-in-polymer electrolyte with a wide electrochemical window and recyclability. Nat Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01327-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01327-5