Abstract
Manipulating spin fluctuations with ultrafast laser pulses is a promising route to dynamically control collective phenomena in strongly correlated materials. However, understanding how photoexcited spin degrees of freedom evolve at a microscopic level requires a momentum- and energy-resolved characterization of their nonequilibrium dynamics. Here, we study the photoinduced dynamics of finite-momentum spin excitations in two-dimensional Mott insulators on a square lattice. By calculating the time-resolved resonant inelastic x-ray scattering cross-section, we show that an ultrafast pump above the Mott gap induces a prompt softening of the spin excitation energy, compatible with a transient renormalization of the exchange interaction. While spin fluctuations in a hole-doped system (paramagnons) are well described by Floquet theory, magnons at half filling are found to deviate from this picture. Furthermore, we show that the paramagnon softening is accompanied by an ultrafast suppression of d-wave pairing correlations, indicating a link between the transient spin excitation dynamics and superconducting pairing far from equilibrium.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Following the early demonstration of ultrafast demagnetization in ferromagnets1, the optical manipulation of spin degrees of freedom emerged as an effective strategy for steering electronic properties in quantum materials2. Over the years, light excitation protocols evolved from purely thermal effects to more sophisticated optical excitations involving Zeeman interaction3, nonlinear phonon excitation4,5, or the renormalization of local interactions6,7. While most of these experimental efforts aim to manipulate magnetic orders, driving fluctuating spins with light could represent an effective dynamical control strategy for superconductivity in strongly correlated electron systems.
In the copper oxides, experimental8,9,10 and theoretical works11,12,13,14,15,16,17 suggest that spin fluctuations around the antiferromagnetic (AFM) wavevector QAF = (π, π) could contribute to the pairing interaction and determine the superconducting critical temperature Tc. Whether optically driving these spin fluctuations may explain the recent observation of light-induced superconductivity in certain copper oxides18,19,20,21 or be conducive to further optimized light-induced coherence is an open question.
Directly probing the effect of ultrafast light pulses on spin fluctuations at finite momentum q requires a tool beyond optical probes, which are only sensitive to long-wavelength (q ~ 0) dynamics22,23,24,25. Resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) at transition-metal L-edge with cross-polarized incident and scattered X-rays (see Fig. 1a) is sensitive to magnetic excitations and able to map their dispersion thanks to the high photon momentum26,27,28. Pioneering time-resolved RIXS (trRIXS) experiments in the hard X-ray regime provided first snapshots of pseudospin dynamics near QAF in layered iridates29,30 and future soft X-ray experiments at the Cu and Ni L-edges will further expand the reach of this new ultrafast technique. Based on these developments, it becomes critical to theoretically, and possibly experimentally, investigate how dispersive spin fluctuations and superconducting pairing evolve in a prototypical correlated system driven far from equilibrium.
In this work, we present a trRIXS calculation of finite-momentum spin fluctuations in the paradigmatic single-band Hubbard model. We calculate the full trRIXS cross-section for a direct L3-edge absorption for π–σ polarizations and for two different hole doping levels. We show that an ultrafast resonant pump induces a prompt softening of the short-ranged spin excitation spectrum, compatible with a light-induced renormalization of the exchange interaction [sketched in Fig. 1b], and a simultaneous suppression of d-wave pairing correlations. Our findings in a canonical Hubbard model demonstrate that light pulses can be used to tailor finite-momentum spin fluctuations and pave the way to novel strategies for the light control of unconventional superconductors.
Results and discussion
Microscopic model
With a particular focus on the high-Tc cuprates, we consider valence and conduction electrons described by the 2D single-band Hubbard model and for two different hole dopings (x = 0 and x = 0.167). Since the X-ray scattering process explicitly involves an intermediate core level, the full Hamiltonian reads as
Here, diσ (\({d}_{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\sigma }^{{{{\dagger}}} }\)) annihilates (creates) a \(3{d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}\) electron at site i with spin σ, while piασ (\({p}_{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\alpha \sigma }^{{{{\dagger}}} }\)) annihilates (creates) a 2pα electron (α = x, y, z). \({t}_{h}^{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}{{{{{{{\bf{j}}}}}}}}}\) is the hopping integral between site i and j, \({n}_{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}}^{(d)}\,=\,{\sum }_{\sigma }{d}_{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\sigma }^{{{{\dagger}}} }{d}_{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\sigma }\) and \({n}_{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\alpha \sigma }^{(p)}\,=\,{p}_{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\alpha \sigma }^{{{{\dagger}}} }{p}_{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\alpha \sigma }\) are the valence and core-level electron density operators, respectively. The nearest-neighbor hopping amplitude is set to th = 300 meV, the next-nearest neighbor hopping to \({t}_{h}^{\prime}\,=\,-0.3\ {t}_{h}\), and the on-site repulsion to U = 8th31,32. The core–hole potential Uc is instead fixed at 4th and regarded identical for all 2p orbitals31,32,33. Eedge = 938 eV represents instead the Cu L-edge absorption energy, i.e., the energy difference between the 3d and 2p orbitals without spin–orbit coupling. Finally, the spin–orbit coupling with the X-ray-induced core hole in the degenerate 2p-orbitals is accounted for by the last term in Eq. (1) with λ = 13 eV 33,34.
The trRIXS cross-section at a direct absorption edge can be written as35,36 (see Supplementary Note 1 for further details)
where q = qi − qs is the momentum transfer between the incident and scattered photons with energies ωin and ωs, respectively, and \(l(\tau )\,=\,{e}^{-\tau /{\tau }_{{{{{{{{\rm{core}}}}}}}}}}\theta (\tau )\) the core–hole lifetime decay, with \({\tau }_{{{{{{{{\rm{core}}}}}}}}}\,=\,0.5\ {t}_{h}^{-1}\) as its characteristic timescale. For a direct transition (e.g., Cu L-edge), the dipole operator is explicitly given by \({{{{{{{{\mathcal{D}}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{\bf{q}}}}}}}}{{{{{{{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}}}}}}}}={\sum }_{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\alpha \sigma }{e}^{-i{{{{{{{\bf{q}}}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{{{{\bf{r}}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}}}({A}_{\alpha {{{{{{{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}}}}}}}}{d}_{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\sigma }^{{{{\dagger}}} }{p}_{{{{{{{{\bf{i}}}}}}}}\alpha \sigma }+h.c.)\), where Aαε is the matrix element of the dipole transition associated with a ε-polarized photon. As shown in Fig. 1a, we employed the π–σ polarization configuration (εi parallel and εs perpendicular to the scattering plane) and fixed αin + αout = 50°. This probe condition maximizes the spin-flip response in presence of the spin–orbit coupling term26,31. Calculations for the π–π polarization configuration are reported in Supplementary Note 2 for completeness. Due to the \(O({N}_{t}^{4})\) complexity of the trRIXS calculation, we adopt the 12D Betts cluster as a compromise between complexity and finite size.
In our calculations, the vector potential of the optical pump field is
with frequency Ω = 10th ~ 3.0 eV (above the Mott gap ~4–5th) and duration \(6{\sigma }_{t}=18\ {t}_{h}^{-1}\approx 39.49\) fs, while the probe has a Gaussian envelope \(g(\tau ;t)={e}^{-{(\tau -t)}^{2}/2{\sigma }_{{{{{{{{\rm{pr}}}}}}}}}^{2}}/\sqrt{2\pi }{\sigma }_{{{{{{{{\rm{pr}}}}}}}}}\) with \({\sigma }_{{{{{{{{\rm{pr}}}}}}}}}\,=\,1.5\ {t}_{h}^{-1}\). A0 is measured in natural units ea0E0/Ω, where A0 = 0.1 corresponds to a E0 = 79 mV/Å peak electric field. The pump polarization \({\hat{{{{{{{{\bf{e}}}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{\rm{pol}}}}}}}}}\) is linear along the x-direction.
Here, we numerically calculate the trRIXS cross-section at each time step t by scanning the full four-dimensional hyperplane defined by the time-integration variables in Eq. (2) at zero temperature. We first determine the equilibrium ground-state wavefunction with the parallel Arnoldi method37,38 and, then, calculate the time evolution of the system through the Krylov subspace technique39,40.
trRIXS and transient spin fluctuations
In Figure 2, we show selected snapshots of the cross-polarized trRIXS spectrum at q = (π/2, π/2), where the magnon dispersion is maximized [see Supplementary Note 3 for a comparison with q = (0, 2π/3)]. At resonance (ωin ~ 931 eV for Cu L3-edge in Fig. 2), the loss spectra below the Mott gap are dominated by a single intense peak at ω ~ 2J = 0.3 eV, where \(J=4{t}_{h}^{2}/U\) is the exchange interaction. The energy and shape of this peak reflect the distribution of spin excitations: for an undoped Hubbard model, these manifest as a coherent magnon due to the strong antiferromagnetic (AFM) order; in contrast, in the x = 0.167 case, the spin excitations damp into a short-ranged paramagnon41,42,43,44,45. Negative time delays, when the system is close to equilibrium, our calculations reveal a splitting of the resonance along the ωin axis at x = 0.167 doping. This reflects the presence of two different chemical environments, as the valence states can be either half-occupied or empty.
At the center of the pump pulse, the resonance undergoes (i) an overall suppression, and (ii) a redshift along the energy loss axis for both compositions. Since the center of the absorption peak does not exhibit a pump-induced shift along ωin, one can fix ωin = 931.5 eV and examine the time evolution of the magnon/paramagnon peak at q = (π/2, π/2) [see Fig. 3a, b]. The intensity drop and the peak shift closely follow the pump envelope and then persist long after the pump arrival due to the lack of dissipation. The photoexcited RIXS spectrum is visibly broadened at x = 0 and to a lesser extent at x = 0.167. Next, we analyze the dependence of the spin fluctuation peak as a function of the pump field strength A0 up to a maximum value of 1. This physical regime is relevant to recent experiments on Sr2IrO429 and Sr3Ir2O730, which employed fields strengths A0 up to 0.35 and 0.52, respectively. As A0 increases, the peak position for both x = 0 and x = 0.167 shifts monotonically to lower energies [see Fig. 3c, d] by 80% and 50%, respectively. At the same time, the magnon/paramagnon peak broadens due to the generation of high-order fluctuations beyond simple spin-wave excitations and of photo-doped carriers which perturb the spin background. These observations imply that optical laser pulses with negligible momentum have tangible effects on the spin fluctuations at large momenta.
Magnon/paramagnon energy renormalization
While we report here an exact calculation of the full trRIXS cross-section, it is useful to discuss the microscopic physics at play in more intuitive terms. The magnon/paramagnon energy softening in our single-band Hubbard model can be attributed to photodoping, a dynamical Floquet-type renormalization of the spin-exchange interaction J46,47, or a combination of the two. Other experimentally relevant mechanisms, such as magnetophononics4,48,49, would require extending the Hubbard Hamiltonian through the inclusion of additional degrees of freedom.
We first consider the photodoping contribution. Due to the light-induced holon-doublon excitations, the local spin moment \(\langle {m}_{z}^{2}\rangle\) is diluted. In the simplest linear spin wave picture, this will induce a homogeneous softening of the spin structure factors across the entire Brillouin zone. To quantify this effect, we calculate the instantaneous local moment at t = 0, defined as \(\gamma =\sqrt{\frac{\langle {{{{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}}}^{2}(t=0)\rangle }{\langle {{{{{{{{\bf{S}}}}}}}}}^{2}(t=-\infty )\rangle }}\), and plot the renormalized magnon/paramagnon peak energy \(\gamma {\omega }_{{{{{{{{\bf{q}}}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}}}\) as dashed lines in Fig. 3e, f. Here, \({\omega }_{{{{{{{{\bf{q}}}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{{\rm{eq}}}}}}}}}\) is the numerically evaluated magnon energy at equilibrium. As visible from the comparison, the local photodoping effect, i.e., the dilution of the local spin moment, is too small to account for the observed energy softening.
The other possible mechanism to explain the peak shift hinges on a light-induced renormalization of the effective Hamiltonian. It has been demonstrated that for an ideal system driven by an infinitely long, nonresonant pump, the effective spin exchange energy J is modified by a Floquet dressing of the intermediate doubly occupied states47. In order to quantitatively understand our trRIXS spectrum, we apply Floquet linear spin-wave (FLSW) theory at different pump field amplitudes. In this framework, we assume the system at the center of the pump pulse to be in a steady-state, thus leading to a closed form for the spin excitations dispersion \({\omega }_{{{{{{{{\bf{q}}}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{{\rm{FLSW}}}}}}}}}\) (see “Methods” section.)
By including both the Floquet renormalization and photodoping effects, we calculate the transient magnon/paramagnon energy \(\gamma {\omega }_{{{{{{{{\bf{q}}}}}}}} = (\pi /2,\pi /2)}^{{{{{{{{\rm{FLSW}}}}}}}}}\) and multiply it by a constant factor to match the equilibrium peak positions (see Fig. 3e, f). The scale factors are 1.15 for x = 0 and 1.02 for x = 0.167. At x = 0, the FLSW prediction tracks the magnon softening for weak pump fields but grossly deviates at higher pump strength. This is likely due to mobile photo-carriers which frustrate the AFM ground state50 and lower the energy cost of spin-flip events. At x = 0.167 hole-doping, however, FLSW theory closely aligns with the trRIXS calculation for all pump strengths. We tentatively attribute the difference between these two trends to intrinsic three-site correlated hopping. In the low-energy projection of the Hubbard Hamiltonian, holes can hop to next- and next-next-nearest neighbors (and thus lower the total energy) provided that the middle site has an opposite spin configuration51,52,53, which is otherwise inhibited. At equilibrium, this term partially cancels the doping-induced energy softening31,54 and is essential to reproduce the spin excitation spectrum of copper oxides. Active at x = 0.167, these correlations are silent in the AFM ground state and build up too slowly to compensate for the spin frustration. While both Floquet and linear spin-wave theories over-simplify the nonequilibrium many-body physics at play, their agreement with the paramagnon energy shift provides evidence of an ultrafast modification of effective model parameters beyond pure photodoping.
This striking light-induced softening represents a genuine emergent phenomenon, which is quantitatively distinct from the behavior of magnons/paramagnons at equilibrium. Short-range spin excitations in La2CuO4 show negligible dispersion changes for temperature changes well above their Néel temperature55, while hole-doped cuprates exhibit at most a redshift of order 20–30% for a doping change Δx = 0.4 (undoped to the overdoped regime)41,42,43,44,45. For a direct comparison, we compute the transient hole concentrations 〈nh(t = 0)〉 [see Fig. 4a and Supplementary Note 4], defined as nh = ∑i(1 − ni↑)(1 − ni↓)/N. Due to the presence of quantum fluctuations, the 〈nh〉 at equilibrium is 0.06 higher than the nominal hole concentration (0.167). Out of equilibrium at t = 0, the strongest pump gives only an extra 0.07 holes per site. In both the doped and undoped systems, the number of photoinduced holes is less than the full doping excursion between underdoped and overdoped regimes, and yet produces a larger softening than what is observed in cuprates at equilibrium.
d-wave pairing correlations
Since spin fluctuations have been discussed as a possible source of pairing in the cuprates11,12,13,14,15,16,17,56, we examine whether the paramagnon energy renormalization affects the superconducting pairing. We calculate the d-wave pairing correlation function \({P}_{d}=\langle {{{\Delta }}}_{d}^{{{{\dagger}}} }{{{\Delta }}}_{d}\rangle\) at x = 0.167 for various pump strengths [see Fig. 4b], with the factor Δd defined as \({{{\Delta }}}_{d}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}{\sum }_{{{\bf{k}}}}{d}_{{{\bf{k}}}\uparrow} {d}_{-{{{{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}}}\downarrow }\left[\cos {k}_{x}-\cos {k}_{y}\right]\). At the pump arrival, Pd undergoes a rapid suppression, thus indicating a decrease of pairing in the d-wave channel. The drop in Pd is found to be monotonic with the increase of the pump strength A0. Intuitively, the value of Pd is determined by both the quasiparticle density and the pairing interaction strength. In our calculations, the pump simultaneously increases quasiparticles via photodoping and reduces the spin excitation energy. While the former effect is favorable for superconductivity, it is the latter that dominates and reduces the nonequilibrium pairing correlations.
Conclusions
We studied the light-induced dynamics of finite-momentum spin excitations in the prototypical 2D Hubbard model through a full calculation of the π–σ polarized trRIXS spectrum. By exciting a Mott insulator with an ultrashort pump pulse, we find that magnons and paramagnons undergo a dramatic light-induced softening, which cannot be exclusively explained by photodoping. Paramagnon excitations are quantitatively described by a Floquet renormalization of the effective exchange interactions, while magnons at high field strengths deviate from this picture. At optimal doping, we also observe a sizeable reduction of d-wave pairing correlations. While here we explore a paradigmatic optical excitation at the Mott gap, alternative mechanisms such as phonon Floquet57, ligand manipulation7, multi-band dynamical effects58,59, and coupling to cavities60,61 might lead to harder spin fluctuations and increased pairing47,62. Future polarization-dependent trRIXS experiments and theoretical calculations will be key to investigate these photoinduced spin dynamics in a wide variety of quantum materials63,64.
Methods
Floquet Linear-Spin-Wave Theory
To describe the evolution of magnetic excitations at finite momentum, we generalize the local Floquet renormalization of the spin-exchange interaction46,47 through FLSW theory. This approach is based on the assumption that the driven system can be instantaneously approximated by an effective Hamiltonian \({{{{{{{{\mathcal{H}}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{\rm{F}}}}}}}}}\) and a steady state wavefunction \(\left|{\psi }_{F}\right\rangle\). In the Floquet framework, the hopping tij in the effective Hamiltonian \({{{{{{{{\mathcal{H}}}}}}}}}_{{{{{{{{\rm{F}}}}}}}}}\) is renormalized by a factor \({{{{{{{{\mathcal{J}}}}}}}}}_{m}({{{{{{{\bf{A}}}}}}}}\cdot {{{{{{{{\bf{r}}}}}}}}}_{ij})\), where \({{{{{{{{\mathcal{J}}}}}}}}}_{m}(x)\) is the Bessel function of the first kind and A is the vector potential of an infinitely long driving field. Following second-order perturbation theory, the effective spin-exchange interaction between two coordinates is renormalized into47
Then, through the standard Holstein-Primakoff transformation and large-S expansion, one can obtain the linearized bosonic Hamiltonian
where aq is the magnon annihilation operator and the coefficients Aq and Bq in the two-dimensional plane are65
Here, unlike the equilibrium counterpart, the coefficients are anisotropic due to the electric field polarization
This derivation can be extended to higher-order following the strategy of equilibrium LSW theory65.
Data availability
The numerical data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The relevant scripts of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Beaurepaire, E., Merle, J.-C., Daunois, A. & Bigot, J.-Y. Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4250–4253 (1996).
Kirilyuk, A., Kimel, A. V. & Rasing, T. Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2731–2784 (2010).
Kampfrath, T. et al. Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves. Nat. Photonics 5, 31–34 (2011).
Nova, T. F. et al. An effective magnetic field from optically driven phonons. Nat. Phys. 13, 132–136 (2016).
Disa, A. S. et al. Polarizing an antiferromagnet by optical engineering of the crystal field. Nat. Phys. 16, 937–941 (2020).
Mikhaylovskiy, R. V. et al. Ultrafast optical modification of exchange interactions in iron oxides. Nat. Commun. 6, 8190 (2015).
Ron, A. et al. Ultrafast enhancement of ferromagnetic spin exchange induced by ligand-to-metal charge transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 197203 (2020).
Rossat-Mignod, J. et al. Neutron scattering study of the YBa2Cu3O6+x system. Physica C 185, 86–92 (1991).
Mook, H. A., Yethiraj, M., Aeppli, G., Mason, T. E. & Armstrong, T. Polarized neutron determination of the magnetic excitations in YBa2Cu3O7. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3490–3493 (1993).
Fong, H. et al. Neutron scattering from magnetic excitations in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ. Nature 398, 588–591 (1999).
Scalapino, D., Loh Jr, E. & Hirsch, J. D-wave pairing near a spin-density-wave instability. Phys. Rev. B 34, 8190 (1986).
Gros, C., Joynt, R. & Rice, T. Superconducting instability in the large-U limit of the two-dimensional Hubbard model. Z. Phys. B Condens. Matter 68, 425–432 (1987).
Kotliar, G. & Liu, J. Superexchange mechanism and d-wave superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 38, 5142 (1988).
Schrieffer, J., Wen, X. & Zhang, S. Dynamic spin fluctuations and the bag mechanism of high-Tc superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 39, 11663 (1989).
Scalapino, D. J. The case for dx2-y2 pairing in the cuprate superconductors. Phys. Rep. 250, 329–365 (1995).
Tsuei, C. & Kirtley, J. Pairing symmetry in cuprate superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 969 (2000).
Maier, T. A., Jarrell, M. S. & Scalapino, D. J. Structure of the pairing interaction in the two-dimensional Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 047005 (2006).
Fausti, D. et al. Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe-ordered cuprate. Science 331, 189–191 (2011).
Hu, W. et al. Optically enhanced coherent transport in YBa2Cu3O6.5 by ultrafast redistribution of interlayer coupling. Nat. Mater. 13, 705–711 (2014).
Kaiser, S. et al. Optically induced coherent transport far above Tc in underdoped YBa2Cu3O6+δ. Phys. Rev. B 89, 184516 (2014).
Nicoletti, D. et al. Optically induced superconductivity in striped La2−xBaxCuO4 by polarization-selective excitation in the near infrared. Phys. Rev. B 90, 100503 (2014).
Zhao, H. et al. Coherent spin precession via photoinduced antiferromagnetic interactions in La0.67Ca0.33MnO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 207205 (2011).
Dal Conte, S. et al. Disentangling the electronic and phononic glue in a high-Tc superconductor. Science 335, 1600–1603 (2012).
Batignani, G. et al. Probing ultrafast photo-induced dynamics of the exchange energy in a Heisenberg antiferromagnet. Nat. Photonics 9, 506–510 (2015).
Yang, J. A., Pellatz, N., Wolf, T., Nandkishore, R. & Reznik, D. Ultrafast magnetic dynamics in insulating YBa2Cu3O6.1 revealed by time resolved two-magnon Raman scattering. Nat. Commun. 11, 2548 (2020).
Ament, L. J., Ghiringhelli, G., Sala, M. M., Braicovich, L. & van den Brink, J. Theoretical demonstration of how the dispersion of magnetic excitations in cuprate compounds can be determined using resonant inelastic X-ray scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 117003 (2009).
Haverkort, M. W. Theory of resonant inelastic X-ray scattering by collective magnetic excitations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 167404 (2010).
Ament, L. J. P., van Veenendaal, M., Devereaux, T. P., Hill, J. P. & van den Brink, J. Resonant inelastic X-ray scattering studies of elementary excitations. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 705–767 (2011).
Dean, M. et al. Ultrafast energy-and momentum-resolved dynamics of magnetic correlations in the photo-doped mott insulator Sr2IrO4. Nat. Mater. 15, 601 (2016).
Mazzone, D. G. et al. Laser-induced transient magnons in Sr3Ir2O7 throughout the Brillouin zone. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2103696118 (2021).
Jia, C. J. et al. Persistent spin excitations in doped antiferromagnets revealed by resonant inelastic light scattering. Nat. Commun. 5, 3314 (2014).
Jia, C., Wohlfeld, K., Wang, Y., Moritz, B. & Devereaux, T. P. Using RIXS to uncover elementary charge and spin excitations. Phys. Rev. X 6, 021020 (2016).
Tsutsui, K., Kondo, H., Tohyama, T. & Maekawa, S. Resonant inelastic X-ray scattering spectrum in high-Tc cuprates. Physica B 284, 457–458 (2000).
Kourtis, S., van den Brink, J. & Daghofer, M. Exact diagonalization results for resonant inelastic X-ray scattering spectra of one-dimensional Mott insulators. Phys. Rev. B 85, 064423 (2012).
Chen, Y. et al. Theory for time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering. Phys. Rev. B 99, 104306 (2019).
Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Jia, C., Moritz, B. & Devereaux, T. P. Time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering in a pumped Mott insulator. Phys. Rev. B 101, 165126 (2020).
Lehoucq, R. B., Sorensen, D. C. & Yang, C. ARPACK Users’ Guide: Solution of Large-Scale Eigenvalue Problems with Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Methods (SIAM, 1998).
Jia, C., Wang, Y., Mendl, C., Moritz, B. & Devereaux, T. Paradeisos: a perfect hashing algorithm for many-body eigenvalue problems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 81 (2018).
Manmana, S. R., Wessel, S., Noack, R. M. & Muramatsu, A. Strongly correlated fermions after a quantum quench. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 210405 (2007).
Balzer, M., Gdaniec, N. & Potthoff, M. Krylov-space approach to the equilibrium and nonequilibrium single-particle Green’s function. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 24, 035603 (2011).
Le Tacon, M. et al. Intense paramagnon excitations in a large family of high-temperature superconductors. Nat. Phys. 7, 725–730 (2011).
Dean, M. et al. Persistence of magnetic excitations in La2- xSrxCuO4 from the undoped insulator to the heavily overdoped non-superconducting metal. Nat. Mater. 12, 1019–1023 (2013).
Dean, M. et al. High-energy magnetic excitations in the cuprate superconductor Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ: towards a unified description of its electronic and magnetic degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 147001 (2013).
Lee, W. et al. Asymmetry of collective excitations in electron-and hole-doped cuprate superconductors. Nat. Phys. 10, 883 (2014).
Ishii, K. et al. High-energy spin and charge excitations in electron-doped copper oxide superconductors. Nat. Commun. 5, 3714 (2014).
Mentink, J. H. & Eckstein, M. Ultrafast quenching of the exchange interaction in a Mott insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 057201 (2014).
Mentink, J. H., Balzer, K. & Eckstein, M. Ultrafast and reversible control of the exchange interaction in Mott insulators. Nat. Commun. 6, 6708 (2015).
Fechner, M. et al. Magnetophononics: ultrafast spin control through the lattice. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 064401 (2018).
Afanasiev, D. et al. Ultrafast control of magnetic interactions via light-driven phonons. Nat. Mater. 20, 607–611 (2021).
Tsutsui, K., Shinjo, K. & Tohyama, T. Antiphase oscillations in the time-resolved spin structure factor of a photoexcited Mott insulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127404 (2021).
Spałek, J. Effect of pair hopping and magnitude of intra-atomic interaction on exchange-mediated superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 37, 533 (1988).
Stephan, W. & Horsch, P. Single-particle and optical excitations in doped Mott-Hubbard insulators. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 6, 589–602 (1992).
Bal, J., Oleś, A. M. & Zaanen, J. Spin polarons in the t-t’-J model. Phys. Rev. B 52, 4597 (1995).
Pärschke, E. M. et al. Numerical investigation of spin excitations in a doped spin chain. Phys. Rev. B 99, 205102 (2019).
Matsuura, M., Kawamura, S., Fujita, M., Kajimoto, R. & Yamada, K. Development of spin-wave-like dispersive excitations below the pseudogap temperature in the high-temperature superconductor La2−xSrxCuo4. Phys. Rev. B 95, 024504 (2017).
Scalapino, D. J. A common thread: the pairing interaction for unconventional superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383–1417 (2012).
Hübener, H., De Giovannini, U. & Rubio, A. Phonon driven Floquet matter. Nano Lett. 18, 1535–1542 (2018).
Tancogne-Dejean, N., Sentef, M. A. & Rubio, A. Ultrafast modification of Hubbard U in a strongly correlated material: ab initio high-harmonic generation in NiO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 097402 (2018).
Golež, D., Eckstein, M. & Werner, P. Multiband nonequilibrium GW+ EDMFT formalism for correlated insulators. Phys. Rev. B 100, 235117 (2019).
Gao, H., Schlawin, F., Buzzi, M., Cavalleri, A. & Jaksch, D. Photoinduced electron pairing in a driven cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 053602 (2020).
Sentef, M. A., Li, J., Künzel, F. & Eckstein, M. Quantum to classical crossover of Floquet engineering in correlated quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033033 (2020).
Coulthard, J., Clark, S. R., Al-Assam, S., Cavalleri, A. & Jaksch, D. Enhancement of superexchange pairing in the periodically driven Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. B 96, 085104 (2017).
Cao, Y. et al. Ultrafast dynamics of spin and orbital correlations in quantum materials: an energy-and momentum-resolved perspective. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 377, 20170480 (2019).
Mitrano, M. & Wang, Y. Probing light-driven quantum materials with ultrafast resonant inelastic X-ray scattering. Commun. Phys. 3, 184 (2020).
Delannoy, J.-Y., Gingras, M., Holdsworth, P. & Tremblay, A.-M. Low-energy theory of the t- t’- t "- U Hubbard model at half-filling: interaction strengths in cuprate superconductors and an effective spin-only description of La2CuO4. Phys. Rev. B 79, 235130 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank D.R. Baykusheva, M. Buzzi, C.-C. Chen, M.P.M. Dean, A.A. Husain, C.J. Jia, D. Nicoletti, and M. Sentef for insightful discussions. Y.C., T.P.D., and B.M. were supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515. M.M. was supported by the William F. Milton Fund at Harvard University. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility operated under Contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.W. and M.M. conceived the project. Y.W. and Y.C. performed the calculations. Y.W. and M.M. performed the data analysis. Y.W. and M.M. wrote the paper with help from Y.C., B.M. and T.P.D.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Communications Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Devereaux, T.P. et al. X-ray scattering from light-driven spin fluctuations in a doped Mott insulator. Commun Phys 4, 212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00715-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00715-z
This article is cited by
-
Probing magnetic orbitals and Berry curvature with circular dichroism in resonant inelastic X-ray scattering
npj Quantum Materials (2023)
-
Exciton-assisted low-energy magnetic excitations in a photoexcited Mott insulator on a square lattice
Communications Physics (2023)
-
Witnessing light-driven entanglement using time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering
Nature Communications (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.