Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Optimizing work and off-job motivation through proactive recovery strategies

Nature Reviews Psychology (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Two employee-level experiences — off-job recovery and optimal work motivation — are vital for reducing or avoiding work stress and promoting occupational health and work performance. However, the interplay between employee recovery and motivation has been theoretically underdeveloped in prior research. In this Perspective, we present a dual-pathway model of proactive recovery strategies that integrates key concepts from the fields of recovery from work and self-determination theory. This model delineates how individuals can self-manage their off-job time through proactive recovery strategies to optimize motivation across life domains, with potential positive effects for occupational health and work performance. The dual-pathway model of proactive recovery strategies broadens the existing literature on employee recovery and motivation by considering off-job motivation as a key motivational process that connects recovery experiences to motivation, health and performance in the work domain, and by highlighting the often proactive nature of recovery attainment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The dual-pathway model of proactive recovery strategies.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guthier, C., Dormann, C. & Voelkle, M. C. Reciprocal effects between job stressors and burnout: a continuous time meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychol. Bull. 146, 1146–1173 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mazzola, J. J. & Disselhorst, R. Should we be “challenging” employees? a critical review and meta-analysis of the challenge-hindrance model of stress. J. Organ. Behav. 40, 949–961 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. van Dam, A., Keijsers, G. P. J., Eling, P. A. T. M. & Becker, E. S. in Handbook on Burnout and Sleep Deprivation: Risk Factors, Management Strategies and Impact on Performance and Behavior (ed. Winston, T. N.) 113–128 (Nova, 2015).

  4. Fanavoll, R., Nilsen, T. I. L., Holtermann, A. & Mork, P. J. Psychosocial work stress, leisure time physical exercise and the risk of chronic pain in the neck/shoulders: longitudinal data from the Norwegian HUNT study. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health 29, 585–595 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Öhman, L., Bergdahl, J., Nyberg, L. & Nilsson, L. G. Longitudinal analysis of the relation between moderate long-term stress and health. Stress. Health 23, 131–138 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hassard, J., Teoh, K. R. H., Visockaite, G., Dewe, P. & Cox, T. The cost of work-related stress to society: a systematic review. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 23, 1–17 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meijman, T. F. & Mulder, G. in Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology Vol. 2 (eds Drenth, P. J. D., Thierry, H. & de Wolff, C. J.) 5–33 (Psychology, 1998).

  8. Hobfoll, S. E. Conservation of resources. A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am. Psychol. 44, 513–524 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hobfoll, S. E. The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Appl. Psychol. 50, 337–421 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Geurts, S. A. E. & Sonnentag, S. Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health 32, 482–492 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Siltaloppi, M., Kinnunen, U. & Feldt, T. Recovery experiences as moderators between psychosocial work characteristics and occupational well-being. Work Stress 23, 330–348 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van Hooff, M. L. M., Geurts, S. A. E., Beckers, D. G. J. & Kompier, M. A. J. Daily recovery from work: the role of activities, effort and pleasure. Work Stress 25, 55–74 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bakker, A. B. & de Vries, J. D. Job demands–resources theory and self-regulation: new explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety Stress. Coping 34, 1–21 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sonnentag, S. & Fritz, C. Recovery from job stress: the stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. J. Organ. Behav. 36, S72–S103 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bennett, A. A., Bakker, A. B. & Field, J. G. Recovery from work-related effort: a meta-analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 39, 262–275 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Headrick, L., Newman, D. A., Park, Y. A. & Liang, Y. Recovery experiences for work and health outcomes: a meta-analysis and recovery-engagement-exhaustion model. J. Bus. Psychol. 38, 821–864 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Steed, L. B., Swider, B. W., Keem, S. & Liu, J. T. Leaving work at work: a meta-analysis on employee recovery from work. J. Manage. 47, 867–897 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Trépanier, S. G., Forest, J., Fernet, C. & Austin, S. On the psychological and motivational processes linking job characteristics to employee functioning: insights from self-determination theory. Work Stress 29, 286–305 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11, 227–268 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness (Guilford, 2017).

  21. Fernet, C. & Austin, S. in The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory (ed. Gagné, M.) 231–244 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).

  22. Weinstein, N. & Ryan, R. M. A self-determination theory approach to understanding stress incursion and responses. Stress Health 27, 4–17 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams, G. C. et al. Managerial support for basic psychological needs, somatic symptom burden and work-related correlates: a self-determination theory perspective. Work Stress 28, 404–419 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H. & Ryan, R. M. Self-determination theory in work organizations: the state of a science. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 4, 19–43 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Van den Broeck, A., Howard, J. L., Van Vaerenbergh, Y., Leroy, H. & Gagné, M. Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: a meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 11, 240–273 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fernet, C., Austin, S. & Vallerand, R. J. The effects of work motivation on employee exhaustion and commitment: an extension of the JD-R model. Work Stress 26, 213–229 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kinnunen, U. & Feldt, T. Job characteristics, recovery experiences and occupational well-being: testing cross-lagged relationships across 1 year. Stress Health 29, 369–382 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sonnentag, S., Mojza, E. J., Demerouti, E. & Bakker, A. B. Reciprocal relations between recovery and work engagement: the moderating role of job stressors. J. Appl. Psychol. 97, 842–853 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. van Hooff, M. L. M. & Geurts, S. A. E. Need satisfaction and employees’ recovery state at work: a daily diary study. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 20, 377–387 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. ten Brummelhuis, L. L. & Trougakos, J. P. The recovery potential of intrinsically versus extrinsically motivated off-job activities. J. Occup. Organ. Psych. 87, 177–199 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kleiber, D. A. The neglect of relaxation. J. Leisure Res. 32, 82–86 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kossek, E. E. & Misra, K. in Work Motivation: Past, Present, and Future (eds Kanfer, R., Chen, G. & Pritchard, R. D.) 471–499 (Routledge, 2008).

  33. Dombestein, H., Norheim, A. & Lunde Husebø, A. M. Understanding informal caregivers’ motivation from the perspective of self-determination theory: an integrative review. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 34, 267–279 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Millette, V. & Gagné, M. Designing volunteers’ tasks to maximize motivation, satisfaction and performance: the impact of job characteristics on volunteer engagement. Motiv. Emot. 32, 11–22 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Standage, M. & Ryan, R. M. in Handbook of Sport Psychology (eds Tenenbaum, G. & Eklund, R. C.) 37–56 (Wiley, 2020).

  36. Webb, E. & Karlis, G. Theoretical developments in leisure studies: a look at perceived freedom and intrinsic motivation. Loisir et. Societe 40, 268–283 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kosenkranius, M., Rink, F., Weigelt, O. & de Bloom, J. Crafting and human energy: needs-based crafting efforts across life domains shape employees’ daily energy trajectories. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 28, 192–204 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Quinn, R. W., Spreitzer, G. M. & Lam, C. F. Building a sustainable model of human energy in organizations: exploring the critical role of resources. Acad. Manage. Ann. 6, 337–396 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cangiano, F., Parker, S. K. & Ouyang, K. Too proactive to switch off: when taking charge drains resources and impairs detachment. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 26, 142–154 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Nielsen, K., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A. & Antino, M. What happens at work does not always stay at work: daily job crafting and detachment among colleagues. Appl. Psychol. 73, https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12499 (2023).

  41. Sonnentag, S. Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 518–528 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Iwasaki, Y. Contributions of leisure to “meaning-making” and its implications for leisure studies and services. Ann. Leisure Res. 20, 416–426 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jones, D. R. Academic leisure crafting: more than a respite to breath? Br. Educ. Res. J. 48, 137–159 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Stebbins, R. A. Leisure Motive Volunteer: Theories Serious, Casual, Project-Based Leisure (Springer, 2015).

  45. Bakker, A. B. & van Woerkom, M. Flow at work: a self-determination perspective. Occup. Health Sci. 1, 47–65 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Deci, E. L. Making room for self-regulation: some thoughts on the link between emotion and behavior. Psychol. Inq. 7, 220–223 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C. & Leone, D. R. Facilitating internalization: the self‐determination theory perspective. J. Pers. 62, 119–142 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Vansteenkiste, M. & Ryan, R. M. On psychological growth and vulnerability: basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. J. Psychother. Integr. 23, 263–280 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. de Bloom, J., Vaziri, H., Tay, L. & Kujanpää, M. An identity-based integrative needs model of crafting: crafting within and across life domains. J. Appl. Psychol. 105, 1423–1446 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jungert, T., Van den Broeck, A., Schreurs, B. & Osterman, U. How colleagues can support each other’s needs and motivation: an intervention on employee work motivation. Appl. Psychol. 67, 3–29 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vallerand, R. J. Deci and Ryan’s self-determination theory: a view from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychol. Inq. 11, 312–318 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sonnentag, S. & Fritz, C. The recovery experience questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 12, 204–221 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bennett, A. A., Gabriel, A. S., Calderwood, C., Dahling, J. J. & Trougakos, J. P. Better together? Examining profiles of employee recovery experiences. J. Appl. Psychol. 101, 1635–1654 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chawla, N., MacGowan, R. L., Gabriel, A. S. & Podsakoff, N. P. Unplugging or staying connected? Examining the nature, antecedents, and consequences of profiles of daily recovery experiences. J. Appl. Psychol. 105, 19–39 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E. & Sanz-Vergel, A. Job demands–resources theory: ten years later. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 10, 25–53 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Grant, A. M. & Ashford, S. J. The dynamics of proactivity at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 28, 3–34 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Strauss, K. & Parker, S. K. in The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory (ed. Gagné, M.) 50–71 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).

  58. Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S. & Viswesvaran, C. Employee proactivity in organizations: a comparative meta-analysis of emergent proactive constructs. J. Occup. Organ. Psych. 83, 275–300 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kujanpää, M. et al. Needs-based off-job crafting across different life domains and contexts: testing a novel conceptual and measurement approach. Front. Psychol. 13, 959296 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Op den Kamp, E. M., Tims, M., Bakker, A. B. & Demerouti, E. Proactive vitality management in the work context: development and validation of a new instrument. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 27, 493–505 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Verelst, L., De Cooman, R. & Verbruggen, M. Crafting when teleworking: a daily diary study on the combinations of job and home crafting and their relationship with energy depletion. J. Vocat. Behav. 143, 141291 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Bruning, P. F. & Campion, M. A. A role–resource approach–avoidance model of job crafting: a multimethod integration and extension of job crafting theory. Acad. Manage. J. 61, 499–522 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Higgins, E. T. Promotion and prevention: regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 30, 1–46 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Lazazzara, A., Tims, M. & de Gennaro, D. The process of reinventing a job: a meta-synthesis of qualitative job crafting research. J. Vocat. Behav. 116, 103267 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang, F. & Parker, S. K. Reorienting job crafting research: a hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review. J. Organ. Behav. 40, 126–146 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lichtenthaler, P. W. & Fischbach, A. A meta-analysis on promotion- and prevention-focused job crafting. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 28, 30–50 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lopper, E., Horstmann, K. T. & Hoppe, A. The approach–avoidance job crafting scale: development and validation of a measurement of the hierarchical structure of job crafting. Appl. Psychol. 73, 93–134 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Petrou, P. & Xanthopoulou, D. Interactive effects of approach and avoidance job crafting in explaining weekly variations in work performance and employability. Appl. Psychol. 70, 1345–1359 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Green, P. I., Finkel, E. J., Fitzsimons, G. M. & Gino, F. The energizing nature of work engagement: toward a new need-based theory of work motivation. Res. Organ. Behav. 37, 1–18 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kuykendall, L., Boemerman, L. & Zhu, Z. in Handbook of Well-Being (eds Diener, E., Oishi, S. & Tay, L.) 433–446 (DEF, 2018).

  71. Sluiter, J. K., de Croon, E. M., Meijman, T. F. & Frings-Dresen, M. H. W. Need for recovery from work related fatigue and its role in the development and prediction of subjective health complaints. Occup. Environ. Med. 60, 62–70 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Virtanen, A., Van Laethem, M., de Bloom, J. & Kinnunen, U. Drammatic breaks: break recovery experiences as mediators between job demands and affect in the afternoon and evening. Stress Health 37, 801–818 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kosenkranius, M., Rink, F., Kujanpää, M. & de Bloom, J. Motives for crafting work and leisure: focus on opportunities at work and psychological needs as drivers of crafting efforts. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 18, 23 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Laporte, N., Soenens, B., Brenning, K. & Vansteenkiste, M. Adolescents as active managers of their own psychological needs: the role of psychological need crafting in adolescents’ mental health. J. Adolesc. 88, 67–83 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Berg, J. M., Grant, A. M. & Johnson, V. When callings are calling: crafting work and leisure in pursuit of unanswered occupational callings. Organ. Sci. 21, 973–994 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Petrou, P. & Bakker, A. B. Crafting one’s leisure time in response to high job strain. Hum. Relat. 69, 507–529 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Hagger, M. S. Conservation of resources theory and the ‘strength’ model of self-control: conceptual overlap and commonalities. Stress Health 31, 89–94 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P. & Westman, M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: the reality of resources and their consequences. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 5, 103–128 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Dubbelt, L., Demerouti, E. & Rispens, S. The value of job crafting for work engagement, task performance, and career satisfaction: longitudinal and quasi-experimental evidence. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 28, 300–314 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Sonnentag, S., Cheng, B. H. & Parker, S. L. Recovery from work: advancing the field toward the future. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 9, 33–60 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Gagné, M. et al. Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 1, 378–392 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Forest, J., Gradito Dubord, M.-A., Olafsen, A. H. & Carpentier, J. in The Oxford Handbook of Self-Determination Theory (ed. Ryan, R.) 875–900 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2023).

  83. Olafsen, A. H. & Deci, E. L. in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology (ed. Braddick, O.) (Oxford Univ. Press, 2020).

  84. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Can. Psychol. 49, 14–23 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Milyavskaya, M. & Koestner, R. Psychological needs, motivation, and well-being: a test of self-determination theory across multiple domains. Pers. Individ. Dif. 50, 387–391 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Li, Y. N., Cheng, B. H., Yu, B. & Zhu, J. N. Y. Let’s get physical! A time-lagged examination of the motivation for daily physical activity and implications for next-day performance and health. Pers. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12585 (2023).

  87. Pedersen, C., Halvari, H. & Olafsen, A. H. Worksite physical activity intervention and somatic symptoms burden: the role of coworker support for basic psychological needs and autonomous motivation. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 24, 55–65 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Bidee, J. et al. Autonomous motivation stimulates volunteers’ work effort: a self-determination theory approach to volunteerism. Voluntas 24, 32–47 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Oostlander, J., Güntert, S. T. & Wehner, T. Linking autonomy-supportive leadership to volunteer satisfaction: a self-determination theory perspective. Voluntas 25, 1368–1387 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Uysal, A. & Yildirim, I. G. in Gamer Psychology and Behavior (ed. Bostan, B.) 123–135 (Springer, 2016).

  91. Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J. P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C. & Westman, M. Getting to the “COR”: understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. J. Manage. 40, 1334–1364 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Bunea, E., Kark, R. & Hammond, M. “Leisureship”: impact of pursuing serious leisure on leaders’ performance. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev. 33, 100950 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Han, M. C. & Hwang, P. C. Crafting job and leisure activities when you are overqualified. J. Hosp. Tour. Manage. 48, 146–154 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 61, 101860 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Walker, G. J. The effects of personal, contextual, and situational factors on the facilitation of intrinsic motivation: the case of Chinese/Canadians. J. Leisure Res. 42, 43–66 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Walker, G. J., Yan, N. & Kono, S. Basic psychological need satisfaction and intrinsic motivation during leisure: a cross-cultural comparison. J. Leisure Res. 51, 489–510 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Newman, D. B., Tay, L. & Diener, E. Leisure and subjective well-being: a model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. J. Happiness Stud. 15, 555–578 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Seppälä, P., Harju, L. & Hakanen, J. J. Interactions of approach and avoidance job crafting and work engagement: a comparison between employees affected and not affected by organizational changes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 17, 1–20 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Chen, Y., Li, S., Xia, Q. & He, C. The relationship between job demands and employees’ counterproductive work behaviors: the mediating effect of psychological detachment and job anxiety. Front. Psychol. 8, 1–15 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Moreno-Jiménez, B., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Sanz-Vergel, A. I. & Garrosa, E. Elucidating the role of recovery experiences in the job demands–resources model. Span. J. Psychol. 15, 659–669 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. de Bloom, J. et al. Effects of park walks and relaxation exercises during lunch breaks on recovery from job stress: two randomized controlled trials. J. Environ. Psychol. 51, 14–30 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Kujanpää, M. et al. Need satisfaction and optimal functioning at leisure and work: a longitudinal validation study of the DRAMMA model. J. Happiness Stud. 22, 681–707 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Gillet, N., Fouquereau, E., Lafrenière, M. A. K. & Huyghebaert, T. Examining the roles of work autonomous and controlled motivations on satisfaction and anxiety as a function of role ambiguity. J. Psychol. Interdiscip. Appl. 150, 644–665 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Nix, G. A., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B. & Deci, E. L. Revitalization through self-regulation: the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35, 266–284 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. From ego depletion to vitality: theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 2, 702–717 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Denovan, A. & Macaskill, A. Building resilience to stress through leisure activities: a qualitative analysis. Ann. Leisure Res. 20, 446–466 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Frone, M. R. & Rice, R. W. Work–family conflict: the effect of job and family involvement. J. Occup. Behav. 8, 45–53 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Brosi, P. & Gerpott, F. H. Stayed at home—but can’t stop working despite being ill? Guilt as a driver of presenteeism at work and home. J. Organ. Behav. 44, 853–870 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Cropley, M. & Millward, L. J. How do individuals “switch-off” from work during leisure? A qualitative description of the unwinding process in high and low ruminators. Leisure Stud. 28, 333–347 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Iso-Ahola, S. E. & Mannell, R. C. in Work and Leisure (eds Hawort, J. T. & Veal, A. J.) 184–199 (Routledge, 2004).

  111. Vallerand, R. J. Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 29, 271–360 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Staines, G. L. Spillover versus compensation: a review of the literature on the relationship between work and nonwork. Hum. Relat. 33, 111–129 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Vogel, R. M., Rodell, J. B. & Lynch, J. W. Engaged and productive misfits: how job crafting and leisure activity mitigate the negative effects of value incongruence. Acad. Manage. J. 59, 1561–1584 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Ryan, R. M., Soenens, B. & Vansteenkiste, M. Reflections on self-determination theory as an organizing framework for personality psychology: interfaces, integrations, issues, and unfinished business. J. Pers. 87, 115–145 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Binnewies, C., Sonnentag, S. & Mojza, E. J. Recovery during the weekend and fluctuations in weekly job performance: a week-level study examining intra-individual relationships. J. Occup. Organ. Psych. 83, 419–441 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Brauchli, R., Kerksieck, P., Tušl, M. & Bauer, G. F. Staying healthy during COVID-19 crisis: well-being and salutogenic crafting among German and Swiss working population. Health Promot. Int. 38, 1–13 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Pijpker, R. et al. The role of off‐job crafting in burnout prevention during COVID‐19 crisis: a longitudinal study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 19, 4 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Kujanpää, M. et al. The forgotten ones: crafting for meaning and for affiliation in the context of Finnish and Japanese employees’ off-job lives. Front. Psychol. 12, 1–11 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Crain, T. L., Brossoit, R. M. & Fisher, G. G. Work, nonwork, and sleep (WNS): a review and conceptual framework. J. Bus. Psychol. 33, 675–697 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Spreitzer, G. M. & Porath, C. L. in The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory (ed. Gagné, M.) 245–258 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).

  121. Kirchmeyer, C. Perceptions of nonwork-to-work spillover: challenging the common view of conflict-ridden domain relationships. Basic. Appl. Soc. Psych. 13, 231–249 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Hamrick, A. B., Paterson, T. A., Michaelis, T. L., Murnieks, C. Y. & Petrou, P. Work hard or play hard: the effect of leisure crafting on opportunity recognition and venture performance. J. Bus. Venturing 38, 106327 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Geurts, S. A. E. et al. Work–home interaction from a work psychological perspective: development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING. Work Stress 19, 319–339 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Greenhaus, J. H. & Beutell, N. J. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad. Manage. Rev. 10, 76–88 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Baker, W. E. Emotional energy, relational energy, and organizational energy: toward a multilevel model. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 6, 373–395 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Almén, N., Lisspers, J., Öst, L. G. & Sundin, Ö. Behavioral stress recovery management intervention for people with high levels of perceived stress: a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Stress. Manage. 27, 183–194 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Garland, E. L., Farb, N. A., Goldin, P. R. & Fredrickson, B. L. The mindfulness-to-meaning theory: extensions, applications, and challenges at the attention–appraisal–emotion interface. Psychol. Inq. 26, 377–387 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Ryan, R. & Deci, E. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Waterschoot, J., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Morbée, S., Soenens, B. & Vansteenkiste, M. “How to unlock myself from boredom?” The role of mindfulness and a dual awareness- and action-oriented pathway during the COVID-19 lockdown. Pers. Individ. Dif. 175, 1–6 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Brunet, J., Gunnell, K. E., Gaudreau, P. & Sabiston, C. M. An integrative analytical framework for understanding the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation. Pers. Individ. Dif. 84, 2–15 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Trépanier, S.-G., Vallerand, R. J., Ménard, J. & Peterson, C. Job resources and burnout: work motivation as a moderator. Stress Health 36, 433–441 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M. & Nassrelgrgawi, A. S. Performance, incentives, and needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness: a meta-analysis. Motiv. Emot. 40, 781–813 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C.-H. & Rosen, C. C. A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. J. Manage. 42, 1195–1229 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  134. de Bloom, J., Kinnunen, U. & Korpela, K. Recovery processes during and after work. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 57, 732–742 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Shimazu, A., Sonnentag, S., Kubota, K. & Kawakami, N. Validation of the Japanese version of the recovery experience questionnaire. J. Occup. Health 54, 196–205 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Ren, F., Zhang, Q. & Wei, X. Work autonomous and controlled motivation on Chinese employees’ work performance and innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of financial stress. Front. Psychol. 12, 1–9 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Volman, F. E., Bakker, A. B. & Xanthopoulou, D. Recovery at home and performance at work: a diary study on self–family facilitation. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 22, 218–234 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Eschleman, K. J., Madsen, J., Alarcon, G. & Barelka, A. Benefiting from creative activity: the positive relationships between creative activity, recovery experiences, and performance-related outcomes. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 87, 579–598 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B. & Moreno-Jiménez, B. Daily detachment from work and home: the moderating effect of role salience. Hum. Relat. 64, 775–799 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Guo, Y. & Zhu, Y. Psychological detachment and research performance: work engagement as a mediator. Soc. Behav. Pers. 47, 10 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  141. Fritz, C., Yankelevich, M., Zarubin, A. & Barger, P. Happy, healthy, and productive: the role of detachment from work during nonwork time. J. Appl. Psychol. 95, 977–983 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., Siltaloppi, M. & Sonnentag, S. Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: testing recovery experiences as mediators. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 20, 805–832 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E. & Fugate, M. All in a day’s work: boundaries and micro role transitions. Acad. Manage. Rev. 25, 472–491 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Hecht, T. D. & Allen, N. J. A longitudinal examination of the work–nonwork boundary strength construct. J. Organ. Behav. 30, 839–862 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Tappe, K. A. & Glanz, K. Measurement of exercise habits and prediction of leisure-time activity in established exercise. Psychol. Health Med. 18, 601–611 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Shi, Y., She, Z., Li, D., Zhang, H. & Niu, K. Job crafting promotes internal recovery state, especially in jobs that demand self-control: a daily diary design. BMC Public Health 21, 1–18 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Gravador, L. N. & Teng-Calleja, M. Work–life balance crafting behaviors: an empirical study. Pers. Rev. 47, 786–804 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Kerksieck, P. et al. Crafting work–nonwork balance involving life domain boundaries: development and validation of a novel scale across five countries. Front. Psychol. 13, 892120 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Petrou, P., Bakker, A. B. & van den Heuvel, M. Weekly job crafting and leisure crafting: implications for meaning-making and work engagement. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 90, 129–152 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Wendsche, J. & Lohmann-Haislah, A. A meta-analysis on antecedents and outcomes of detachment from work. Front. Psychol. 7, 1–24 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Snir, R. & Harpaz, I. Work–leisure relations: leisure orientation and the meaning of work. J. Leisure Res. 34, 178–203 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Syrek, C. J., de Bloom, J. & Lehr, D. Well recovered and more creative? A longitudinal study on the relationship between vacation and creativity. Front. Psychol. 12, 784844 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Stockkamp, M., Kuonath, A., Kühnel, J., Kennecke, S. & Frey, D. Intrinsic motivation as a double-edged sword: investigating effects on well-being and the role of flex place practices as moderator to buffer adverse effects. Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12399 (2022).

  154. Olafsen, A. H. & Bentzen, M. Benefits of psychological detachment from work: does autonomous work motivation play a role? Front. Psychol. 11, 824 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Parker, S. L., Dawson, N., Van den Broeck, A., Sonnentag, S. & Neal, A. Employee motivation profiles, energy levels, and approaches to sustaining energy: a two-wave latent-profile analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 131, 103659 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Fritz, C., Lam, C. & Spreitzer, G. It’s the little things that matter: an examination of knowledge workers’ energy management. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 25, 28–39 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  157. Zacher, H., Brailsford, H. A. & Parker, S. L. Micro-breaks matter: a diary study on the effects of energy management strategies on occupational well-being. J. Vocat. Behav. 85, 287–297 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Gagné, M. et al. The multidimensional work motivation scale: validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 24, 178–196 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Sonnentag, S. The recovery paradox: portraying the complex interplay between job stressors, lack of recovery, and poor well-being. Res. Organ. Behav. 38, 169–185 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  160. Hahn, V. C., Binnewies, C., Sonnentag, S. & Mojza, E. J. Learning how to recover from job stress: effects of a recovery training program on recovery, recovery-related self-efficacy, and well-being. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 16, 202–216 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Sonnentag, S. & Kruel, U. Psychological detachment from work during off-job time: the role of job stressors, job involvement, and recovery-related self-efficacy. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 15, 197–217 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Mäkikangas, A. Job crafting profiles and work engagement: a person-centered approach. J. Vocat. Behav. 106, 101–111 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Mäkikangas, A. & Schaufeli, W. A person-centered investigation of two dominant job crafting theoretical frameworks and their work-related implications. J. Vocat. Behav. 131, 103658 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Mauno, S. & Kinnunen, U. in Flexible Working Practices and Approaches: Psychological and Social Implications (ed. Korunka, C.) 59–78 (Springer, 2021).

  165. Iwasaki, Y. Leisure and quality of life in an international and multicultural context: what are major pathways linking leisure to quality of life? Soc. Indic. Res. 82, 233–264 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  166. Porter, H., Iwasaki, Y. & Shank, J. Conceptualizing meaning-making through leisure experiences. Loisir et. Soc. 33, 167–194 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Gaillard, A., Sultan-Taïeb, H., Sylvain, C. & Durand, M. J. Economic evaluations of mental health interventions: a systematic review of interventions with work-focused components. Saf. Sci. 132, 104982 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank C. P. Niemiec and G. C. Williams for their valuable feedback on the conceptual model presented in this manuscript. The authors disclose support for the research of this work from The Research Council of Norway (grant number 301316).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, University of South-Eastern Norway, Hønefoss, Norway

    Miika Kujanpää & Anja H. Olafsen

Authors
  1. Miika Kujanpää
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anja H. Olafsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors contributed to the conceptualization of the work. The first author led the writing of the manuscript. Both authors were involved in drafting and revising the intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miika Kujanpää.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Reviews Psychology thanks Arnold Bakker, Tiphaine Huyghebaert-Zouaghi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kujanpää, M., Olafsen, A.H. Optimizing work and off-job motivation through proactive recovery strategies. Nat Rev Psychol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00298-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00298-w

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing