FGF signalling controls the specification of hair placode-derived SOX9 positive progenitors to Merkel cells

Nguyen, Minh Binh; Cohen, Idan; Kumar, Vinod; Xu, Zijian; Bar, Carmit; Dauber-Decker, Katherine L.; Tsai, Pai-Chi; Marangoni, Pauline; Klein, Ophir D.; Hsu, Ya-Chieh; Chen, Ting; Mikkola, Marja L.; Ezhkova, Elena

doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04399-y

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 20 June 2018

FGF signalling controls the specification of hair placode-derived SOX9 positive progenitors to Merkel cells

Minh Binh Nguyen¹^na1,
Idan Cohen¹^na1,
Vinod Kumar²,
Zijian Xu³,
Carmit Bar¹,
Katherine L. Dauber-Decker¹,
Pai-Chi Tsai⁴,
Pauline Marangoni⁵,
Ophir D. Klein ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6254-7082^5,6,
Ya-Chieh Hsu⁴,
Ting Chen³,
Marja L. Mikkola² &
…
Elena Ezhkova ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5524-2344¹

Nature Communications volume 9, Article number: 2333 (2018) Cite this article

6294 Accesses
31 Citations
2 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 17 July 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Merkel cells are innervated mechanosensory cells responsible for light-touch sensations. In murine dorsal skin, Merkel cells are located in touch domes and found in the epidermis around primary hairs. While it has been shown that Merkel cells are skin epithelial cells, the progenitor cell population that gives rise to these cells is unknown. Here, we show that during embryogenesis, SOX9-positive (+) cells inside hair follicles, which were previously known to give rise to hair follicle stem cells (HFSCs) and cells of the hair follicle lineage, can also give rise to Merkel Cells. Interestingly, while SOX9 is critical for HFSC specification, it is dispensable for Merkel cell formation. Conversely, FGFR2 is required for Merkel cell formation but is dispensable for HFSCs. Together, our studies uncover SOX9(+) cells as precursors of Merkel cells and show the requirement for FGFR2-mediated epithelial signalling in Merkel cell specification.

TBX2 specifies and maintains inner hair and supporting cell fate in the Organ of Corti

Article Open access 09 December 2022

Tp63-expressing adult epithelial stem cells cross lineages boundaries revealing latent hairy skin competence

Article Open access 06 November 2020

Nestin is a marker of unipotent embryonic and adult progenitors differentiating into an epithelial cell lineage of the hair follicles

Article Open access 24 October 2022

Introduction

The skin epithelium is an essential barrier that protects the body from the environment, helps to maintain temperature and keep water within the body, and performs sensory functions¹. These activities are largely provided by the epidermis, hair follicles, and specialized cells, including Merkel cells, which respectively serve protective barrier functions, provide thermoprotection, and are involved in mechanosensation^1,2,3. While much has been learned about the development of hair follicles and the epidermis, the processes controlling the specification of Merkel cell are largely understudied. These mechanosensory cells are innervated by afferent neurons and are responsible for the tactile discrimination of the shape and texture of objects^4,5. Recent studies have shown that upon touch stimulation, Merkel cells produce ionic currents that induce a release of neurotransmitters, which trigger firing of the afferent neurons that innervate Merkel cells^6,7,8. Moreover, mice without Merkel cells are unable to discriminate between different textures when performing behavioural tasks⁹.

Much of what we know about the biology of Merkel cells came from studies of murine back skin, where Merkel cells are located in specialized structures called touch domes¹⁰. Touch domes consist of Merkel cells, specialized keratinocytes, and afferent neurons, and are located exclusively around primary hair follicles, which represent 1–3% of the mouse hair coat^3,5,6,9,11. Although Merkel cells were discovered more than 100 years ago, their cell of origin is still unknown. It was long believed that Merkel cells originate from the neural crest¹² until fate-mapping experiments showed that embryonic epidermal progenitor cells that express keratin (KRT) 14 give rise to Merkel cells^13,14,15. While these studies showed that Merkel cells are of skin epithelial origin, they also raised questions as to whether a specific population of Merkel cell precursors exists. Indeed, at embryonic day (E) 14.5 when the first Merkel cells appear, embryonic epidermal progenitors are no longer a single layer of cells, as epidermal stratification has initiated and hair follicles are at the placode stage^13,16,17.

In this study, we analysed the appearance of the first Merkel cells in the skin during embryogenesis and found that these cells appear inside of developing hair follicles. By performing lineage tracing experiments, we discovered that SOX9(+) cells, which in prior literature have been proven to give rise to cells of the hair follicle lineage, including HFSCs that maintain postnatal hair follicle growth and homoeostasis, can also give rise to Merkel Cells. We dissected the molecular mechanisms controlling the specification of SOX9(+) cells to Merkel cells and showed that although SOX9 is critical for SOX9(+) cell specification to HFSCs, it is dispensable for Merkel cell formation. Interestingly, FGFR2-mediated signalling in the skin epithelium is critical for Merkel cell development but is not required for HFSC specification. Taken together, our studies uncovered that SOX9(+) cells located within the developing hair placodes give rise to Merkel cells through FGFR2-mediated signalling.

Results

Merkel cells form inside hair placodes during development

To gain insights into the cell of origin of Merkel cells, we aimed to visualize where Merkel cells appear in embryonic skin. ATOH1 is one of the earliest Merkel cell differentiation markers¹⁶, and thus we set out to determine where ATOH1(+) cells first appear in the skin. We crossed Atoh1-GFP mice, which contain an enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused to the 3′-end of the atonal homologue 1 gene (Atoh1), with R26-mT/mG mice and collected embryos at E15. By performing confocal imaging we demonstrated that ATOH1-GFP(+) Merkel cells were not present in the basal layer of the epidermis (Fig. 1a, left), and instead they were found within primary hair placodes (Fig. 1a, right). These data are consistent with previous studies of KRT8, an early Merkel cell marker which appears after ATOH1 induction, showing that KRT8(+) cells are present inside of developing hair follicles at E15¹⁸.

The finding that Merkel cells are formed inside of developing hair follicles prompted us to investigate whether a cell population located in hair follicles gives rise to Merkel cells. At the time when the first Merkel cells appear, hair follicle lineage specification has already occurred. The hair follicles contain discrete cell populations with different locations within hair placodes¹⁹. Cells at the leading edge of developing hair follicles express the transcription factor LHX2, whereas suprabasal hair placode cells are positive for the stem cell pioneer factor SOX9 (Fig. 1b–g)^20,21,22. We performed immunofluorescence analysis to determine whether the first Merkel cells appear next to SOX9(+) or LHX2(+) hair follicle cells. At E14.5, when the first Merkel cells are detected, ATOH1-GFP(+) cells were located in hair placodes, near SOX9(+) cells, and further away from LHX2(+) cells (Fig. 1c, f). The proximity of Merkel cells to SOX9(+) cells was even more apparent at E15.5, when more Merkel cells had developed (Fig. 1d, g). Regardless of cell proximity, ATOH1-GFP(+) Merkel cells did not co-label with SOX9 (Supplementary Fig. 1a–c) or LHX2 (Fig. 1f, g). We thus concluded that during development, Merkel cells originate inside of hair placodes and are located near the SOX9(+) cell population.

SOX9(+) cells give rise to Merkel cells in hair placode

The emergence of Merkel cells inside hair follicles prompted us to hypothesize that one of the cell populations inside developing hair follicles is a precursor population for Merkel cells. To test this hypothesis, we used Sox9-CreER; R26-mT/mG and Lhx2-CreER; R26-tdTomato mice to fate map cells originating from SOX9(+) and LHX2(+) cells, correspondingly. Embryos were treated with Tamoxifen at E13.5–E14.5, at which time SOX9(+) and LHX2(+) cells are present but Merkel cells have not yet been specified, and collected from both lines at postnatal day (P) 0 (Fig. 2a) and at E16 for Sox9-CreER; R26-mT/mG (Supplementary Fig. 1d).

Consistent with previous findings²⁰, our analysis of E16 and P0 Sox9-CreER; R26-mT/mG mice revealed the presence of GFP(+) cells in the hair follicle outer root sheath (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 1e). Interestingly, immunofluorescence analysis revealed that GFP staining was found in more than 90% of KRT8(+) Merkel cells (Fig. 2b, c and Supplementary Fig. 1d, e). While we observed that roughly 10% of KRT8(+) cells were not GFP-labelled (Fig. 2b, c and Supplementary Fig. 1d, e), this is likely due to incomplete recombination, as a similar percentage of SOX9(+) cells remained GFP-negative (Supplementary Fig. 1f, g). In contrast, immunofluorescence analysis of tdTOMATO in P0 Lhx2-CreER; R26-tdTomato skins revealed that only 22% of KRT8(+) Merkel cells were tdTOMATO(+) (Fig. 2d, e). These fate-mapping results thus show that SOX9(+) rather than LHX2(+) cells preferentially give rise to Merkel cells.

SHH signalling promotes the specification of SOX9(+) cells

SHH signalling has been shown to be both necessary and sufficient for Merkel cell formation^23,24. We thus asked if SHH controls the Merkel cell lineage by regulating the establishment of SOX9(+) cells. To test this hypothesis, we first overexpressed SHH in the embryonic epidermis by injecting high-titre lentiviruses expressing a doxycycline-inducible Shh-PGK-H2B-RFP construct into the amniotic fluid of E9 Rosa26-rtTA embryos to infect the epidermis^23,25. We administered doxycycline to the pregnant dams starting at E12 and the infected embryos were collected at E17 (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Overexpression of SHH resulted in ectopic KRT8(+) Merkel cells that were located in areas with SHH overexpression, identified by RFP expression (Supplementary Fig. 2c), whereas in control non-infected areas, Merkel cells were present only near primary hairs (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Interestingly, immunostaining for SOX9 showed that the same SHH-expressing areas had ectopic SOX9(+) cells present in the epidermis (Supplementary Fig. 2c), whereas in non-infected control areas, SOX9(+) cells were found only inside hair follicles (Supplementary Fig. 2b).

We next analysed whether SHH signalling is required for the specification of SOX9(+) cells by deleting the essential SHH-signalling signal transducer Smoothened^23,26. We generated skin epithelium-conditional knockout mice of Smoothened (Smo cKO), by crossing Smo floxed mice with mice expressing Krt14-Cre, which is active in embryonic epidermal progenitors starting at E12 (ref. ²⁷). Consistent with previous reports^23,24, there was a dramatic reduction in the number of Merkel cells in P0 Smo cKO skin compared to control skin (Supplementary Fig. 2d). Importantly, immunofluorescence analysis of SOX9 showed that there was an absence of SOX9(+) cells in embryonic and neonatal hair follicles of Smo-null skin, whereas these cells were apparent in control hair follicles (Supplementary Fig. 2d, e). Together, these results showed that in the skin epithelium, SHH signalling promotes specification of SOX9(+) cells and Merkel cell formation.

SOX9 and NFATc1 are dispensable for Merkel cell formation

SOX9(+) cells give rise to HFSCs that, in adulthood, continuously fuel the regeneration of hair follicles during each hair cycle^20,28. Importantly, transcription factor SOX9 is required for the specification of SOX9(+) cells to HFSCs^20,29. As SOX9(+) cells also give rise to Merkel cells, we asked if SOX9 is required for Merkel cell specification. To test this, we generated skin epithelium-conditional knockout mice of Sox9 (Sox9 cKO) by crossing Sox9 floxed mice with Krt14-Cre mice. Immunofluorescence analysis of Sox9-null skins confirmed the loss of SOX9 in hair follicles (Supplementary Fig. 3a). However, despite the loss of SOX9 in the skin epithelium, immunolabelling for early and late Merkel cell differentiation markers, KRT8 and KRT20, respectively, demonstrated no significant changes in the number of KRT8(+) and KRT20(+) cells (Fig. 3a–e).

Another HFSC marker, NFATc1, starts being expressed in SOX9(+) cells in the subsequent hair peg stage, and NFATc1 is critical for acquiring the quiescent state of HFSCs^20,30. To test if NFATc1 is required for Merkel cell specification, we generated and analysed skin epithelium-conditional knockout mice of Nfatc1 (Nfatc1 cKO) by crossing Nfatc1 floxed mice with Krt14-Cre mice. As with Sox9 cKO mice, immunofluorescence analysis of Merkel cell markers KRT8 and KRT20 showed that the number of Merkel cells was not changed between control and Nfatc1 cKO skins (Supplementary Fig. 3b–d). Therefore, while SOX9 and NFATc1 are important for HFSC specification and quiescence, respectively, they are dispensable for Merkel cell formation.

Merkel cell specification requires FGFR2-mediated signalling

While SOX9(+) cells have been shown to give rise to the hair follicle lineage, our studies now unveil that SOX9(+) cells also give rise to Merkel cells. We next aimed to uncover the molecular processes that control the specification of SOX9(+) cells to the Merkel cell lineage. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 20 is expressed by hair placodes (Supplementary Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 4b, left) and is required for the proper development of primary follicles³¹. Interestingly, transcriptional analysis of Fgf20-null skins revealed that at E15.5, there is decreased expression of the early Merkel cell differentiation gene, Atoh1, in Fgf20-null skin compared to control²⁴. To determine if decreased expression of Atoh1 results in changes in Merkel cell numbers, we performed immunofluorescence analysis of Merkel cell markers SOX2 and KRT8 in Fgf20^{β-gal/β-gal} (Fgf20-null) skins, followed by quantification. Indeed, we observed a significant reduction in the number of KRT8(+) and SOX2(+) cells in Fgf20-null skins compared to controls at E16 (Fig. 4a–c) and at P0 (Fig. 4d–f). FGF10, another FGF ligand, is also highly expressed in the developing skin, but is localized in dermal condensates instead of hair placodes (Supplementary Fig. 4b, right)³². Interestingly, and in contrast to Fgf20-null skin analysis, immunofluorescence analysis of KRT8 did not reveal any differences in the number of Merkel cells in the skins of Fgf10-null mice compared to controls (Supplementary Fig. 4c, d).

During primary hair formation, FGF20 functions in both the epithelium and the mesenchyme^33,34. We thus asked whether FGF signalling functions directly in the skin epithelium to specify Merkel cells, or indirectly through control of the mesenchyme. Analysis of published RNA-seq data³⁵[http://hair-gel.net] revealed that among four FGF receptors (FGFR), only FGFR2 is expressed at high levels in E14.5 hair placodes, whereas FGFR1 and FGFR2 are both expressed in the dermal condensate, which consists of dermal papilla precursor cells (Supplementary Fig. 4e). Importantly, immunofluorescence analysis using Fgfr2-mCherry reporter mice demonstrated that FGFR2 expression overlaps with SOX9(+) cells and KRT8(+) Merkel cells at E16 (Supplementary Fig. 4f, g). Furthermore, by analysing the skins of E16 Fgf20^β-gal mice, we observed a gradient in the expression of FGF20^β-gal reporter in FGFR2(+) and SOX9(+) cells, where some FGFR2(+) and SOX9(+) cells had some levels of FGF20^β-gal reporter, while others had none (Supplementary Fig. 4h, i).

To test whether transduction of FGF signalling in skin epithelial cells controls Merkel cell formation, we generated skin epithelium-conditional knockout mice of Fgfr2 by crossing Fgfr2 floxed mice with Krt14-Cre mice. Because there are several FGFR2 isoforms, we generated a conditional deletion of exon 5 of Fgfr2, which is common to all isoforms, thus abrogating FGFR2 function, as previously described³⁶. Immunofluorescence analysis of E16 embryos confirmed efficient loss of FGFR2 protein from the skin epithelium of Fgfr2 cKO mice compared to controls (Supplementary Fig. 4j). Analysis of E16 Fgfr2 cKO skins revealed significant reductions in the numbers KRT8(+) and SOX2(+) Merkel cells (Fig. 4g–i). SOX2 staining was observed in the dermal condensates of control and Fgfr2-null hair follicles, indicating that epithelial FGFR2 was not essential for dermal condensate formation (Fig. 4g). The reduced number of Merkel cells observed in E16 Fgfr2 cKO skins was not due to apoptotic cell death, as assessed by TUNEL staining (Supplementary Fig. 4l). Reduced number of Merkel cells persisted into neonatal life, as shown by immunofluorescence analyses of KRT8 and KRT20 in P0 control and Fgfr2 cKO mice (Fig. 4j–o). Thus, FGFR2-mediated signalling in the skin epithelium is required for Merkel cell formation.

To interrogate why few Merkel cells were formed in Fgfr2 cKO mice, we analysed embryos at E14.5, the time of Merkel cell specification. By performing immunofluorescence studies, we observed incomplete loss of FGFR2 protein from the skin epithelium and the hair placode cells of E14.5 Fgfr2 cKO embryos (Supplementary Fig. 4k). This suggests that the residual level of FGFR2 present at the time of Merkel cell specification could allow for a few Merkel cells to form.

FGFR2 is not required for the specification of HFSCs

As our data showed that FGFR2 is critical for Merkel cell formation, we next asked if FGFR2 is required for the specification of SOX9(+) cells to HFSCs. Our analysis of primary hair follicle development revealed that while there was a reduction in primary hair follicle length in E16 and P0 Fgfr2-null skins compared to controls (Fig. 5a, b and Supplementary Fig. 5a), the number of primary hair follicles was comparable between Fgfr2 cKO and control skins (Fig. 5c). While Fgfr2 cKO hair follicles were shorter, their development was largely normal. Indeed, hair follicles in Fgfr2 cKO skin expressed proper hair follicle differentiation markers AE15, which labels the inner root sheath and medulla^37,38, and AE13, which marks the cuticle and cortex of the hair shaft^37,38 (Supplementary Fig. 5b, c). Furthermore, immunofluorescence analysis also showed that SOX9(+) cells were present in both control and Fgfr2-null hair follicles (Fig. 5d–f). Thus, we concluded that the development and cell differentiation were not arrested in Fgfr2 cKO hair follicles.

In the adult organism, HFSCs promote hair follicle growth through the hair cycle, give rise to sebaceous glands, and express HFSC markers, such as CD34³⁹. As newborn Fgfr2 cKO pups fail to form milk spots and die shortly after birth, in order to analyse HFSCs in the postnatal skin, we performed full-thickness grafts of P0 Fgfr2 cKO and control skins onto the backs of recipient Nude mice²⁰. The analysis of grafts 35 days after engraftment (P35) showed that control and Fgfr2-null hair follicles were fully developed, and formed hair shafts and sebaceous glands (Fig. 5h–i and Supplementary Fig. 5d, e). Similarly to controls, Fgfr2-null hair follicles had a club hair, indicating that these hair follicles had progressed through one hair cycle (Fig. 5i). Furthermore, immunofluorescence staining for HFSC markers CD34 and SOX9 revealed that both control and Fgfr2-null hair follicle bulge cells expressed SOX9 (Fig. 5h) and CD34 (Fig. 5i). Together, these analyses show that FGFR2-mediated signalling is not necessary for HFSC specification.

Discussion

In this paper, we elucidated the cell of origin of Merkel cells and identified the molecular pathways controlling Merkel cell and hair follicle lineage formation (Fig. 6). Our data show that Merkel cells originate from cells located inside hair placodes, which is interesting, as ectodermal placode structures are known to give rise to different sensory tissues⁴⁰. For example, taste sensory cells are known to originate from an ectodermal placode⁴¹. The development of inner ear hair cells that are responsible for balance and the perception of sounds also starts with the formation of an ectodermal placode⁴². Our data now show that similarly to other sensory epithelial tissues, Merkel cells that are involved in light-touch sensations are also formed from ectodermal placodes.

By performing fate-mapping experiments, we show that SOX9(+) and not LHX2(+) cells preferentially gives rise to Merkel cells. Previous lineage tracing experiments showed that progenies of SHH-expressing cells do not give rise to Merkel cells²⁴. As SHH-expressing cells also express LHX2⁴³, our LHX2 fate-mapping results are consistent with these data. Furthermore, previous studies using Shh^GFPcre/+; R26^YFP/+ mice⁴⁴ and our studies using Lhx2-CreER; tdTomato mice have shown to map the majority of cells of the hair follicle lineage. As Merkel cells are largely not labelled using either Shh-Cre or Lhx2-CreER fate-mapping strategies, these data indicate that Merkel cells originate from outside of the SHH- and LHX2-derived hair follicle lineages, which is consistent with previous findings²⁴. Intriguingly, a few Merkel cells appear to be labelled in Shh-Cre²⁴ and Lhx2-CreER lineage tracing experiments. This is likely due to recent findings showing that during development some SOX9(+) cells originate from SHH(+) cells¹⁹. Alternatively, a gradient of expression of SOX9 and LHX2 observed in developing hair follicles leads to a few SOX9 and LHX2 double-positive cells at the transitional zone²², and might thus result in labelling of Merkel cells in the Lhx2-CreER lineage tracing experiment. Taking our study and the published data together, we can conclude that Merkel cell progenitors are predominantly SOX9(+) SHH(−) LHX2(−) cells. While SOX9(+) cells give rise to Merkel cells, our data show that the SOX9 protein itself is absent from ATOH1(+) Merkel cells and SOX9 is not required for Merkel cell specification.

SOX9(+) cells were shown to give rise to developing hair follicles and to serve as precursors of adult HFSCs, which maintain the growth of postnatal follicles during the hair cycle²⁰. Our data now show that Sox9(+) cells have an additional function to give rise to Merkel cells. It is intriguing that SOX9(+) cells gives rise to two completely different structures, the hair follicles and Merkel cells, which perform completely different functions in the body. Furthermore, during development, hair follicles grow downward into the underlying dermis, while Merkel cells are located upwards in the basal layer of the epidermis. Despite these differences, genetic studies showed a strong correlation between hair follicle and Merkel cell development, as genetic mutations ablating hair follicle formation also lead to the loss of Merkel cells^23,24. Our data now provide an explanation for the observed genetic similarities. We show that the specification of SOX9(+) cells is affected in mutants in which hair formation is abrogated, resulting in hair follicle defects and loss of Merkel cells. Future studies of the SOX9(+) cell population will be needed to examine how these cells are fated to become such diverse cell types in the skin. One possible explanation for this is the heterogeneity within the SOX9(+) cell population, as it has recently been shown that some SOX9(+) cells express KRT79, a marker of terminally differentiated hair follicle cells^45,46.

Our data reveal different requirements for SOX9 and FGFR2 to specify HFSCs and Merkel cells from SOX9(+) cells. While SOX9 is essential to specify HFSCs²⁰, our data show that it is not required for Merkel cell formation. We show that FGFR2-mediated signalling in the skin epithelium is critical for Merkel cell formation, but is not required for HFSC specification. The importance of skin epithelial FGFR2-mediated signalling for Merkel cell development is very interesting. Among four FGF receptors, only FGFR2 is expressed at high levels in the developing skin epithelium at the time of Merkel cell specification and, importantly, we show that FGFR2 is expressed in SOX9(+) cells and in Merkel cells.

Which FGF ligand controls Merkel cell specification? We show that FGF20 is important for this process, as there is a reduction in the number of Merkel cells in Fgf20-null skins. Recently, Xiao and colleagues²⁴ observed a drastic reduction in the expression of a key Merkel cell differentiation factor, ATOH1, in E15.5 Fgf20 KO compared to control. Interestingly, however, despite the reduction in ATOH1 expression at the time of Merkel cell specification, Xiao and colleagues²⁴ observed small reduction in Merkel cell numbers in P0 Fgf20 KO mice compared to controls. While this result is different to our findings, this discrepancy could be due to differences in mouse genetic backgrounds used in two studies and thus for some mouse genetic backgrounds lacking FGF20, other FGF ligands can sufficiently compensate for the loss of FGF20 and specify Merkel cells. Indeed, there are more than 23 different known genes that code for FGFs, and much redundancy between FGFs has been reported in other developmental systems⁴⁷. While our data show that FGF10 is not required for Merkel cell formation, other FGF ligands might function with FGF20 to play a role in this process.

Overall, our findings uncover a cell of origin of Merkel cells and identify the molecular mechanisms controlling Merkel cell development. Uncovering the biology of Merkel cells is critical for understanding the function of the skin as a sensory organ, and the interaction between the skin and the nervous system². It is also essential for determining the mechanisms of our perception of touch, which is critical for our survival, as well as the biological processes that go awry in children with hypo and hyper tactile sensitivities, including those observed in autism spectrum disorders^3,5,48,49,50. Finally, defining the mechanisms controlling Merkel cell formation will also allow us to devise differentiation protocols to produce Merkel cells in vitro, which is still challenging. This will be important for improving upon our current method of in vitro epidermis production, allowing us to generate epidermis that is capable of providing both barrier and sensory functions⁵¹.

Methods

Mice

All mice were housed at the Center for Comparative Medicine and Surgery (CCMS), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) and cared for according to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)-approved protocol LA11-0020. For research purposes and in cases of veterinarian-monitored illness, we use carbon dioxide in accordance with the Panel on Euthanasia of the American Veterinary Medical Association to euthanize animals. At least three animals from independent litters were used for each analysis. Immunocompromised Nude (NU-Foxn1^Nu) mice and wild-type CD1 mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratory. Fgf20^β-gal mice⁵² were obtained from David M. Ornitz, and were maintained on a mixed genetic background. Fgf10-null mice have been described⁵³. Fgfr2^flox and Fgfr2-mCherry reporter mice³⁶ were generously provided by Philippe Soriano. Sox9-CreER was described⁵⁴. Lhx2-CreER mice were obtained from Josh Huang and will be described elsewhere. R26-mT/mG (Stock number: 007676), Sox9^flox(Stock number: 013106), Nfatc1^flox(Stock number: 022786), Smo^flox (Stock number: 004526), Atoh1-GFP(Stock number: 013593), R26-rtTA (Stock number: 006965), and Krt14-Cre (Stock number: 004782) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. Because Fgfr2 conditional KO mice die shortly after birth, all analyses of these mice after P0 were performed on grafted skin obtained using the full-thickness grafting protocols^20,55,56. Briefly, full-thickness skins from the back of sex-matched wild type and Fgfr2 conditional knockout (cKO) P0 mice were removed and grafted onto the backs of anaesthetised female Nude mice (nu/nu), with each recipient receiving a wild-type and cKO graft. Grafts were secured by sterile gauze and cloth bandages, which were removed after 4 weeks. For Tamoxifen treatment, Sox9-CreER; R26-mT/mG and Lhx2-CreER; R26-tdTomato were injected with Tamoxifen (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO) doses totalling 40 μg per gram body weight at E13.5 and E14.5, and pups were collected at E16 or P0 for further analysis. Mice were genotyped by PCR using DNA extracted from tail skin. Primers used for genotyping are provided in Supplementary Table 1.

In utero injections

R26-rtTA male mice were mated to CD1 female mice to generate R26-rtTA embryos for ultrasound guided lentiviral injection⁵⁷. A high titre (>10⁹ CFU) of inducible SHH overexpression lentiviral construct (LV-TRE-SHH-PGK-H2B-RFP)⁵⁸ was used to perform microinjections into the amniotic cavities of E9 embryos. E9 timed pregnant mice were anaesthetised with 2.5% isoflurane and 1% oxygen, and then positioned on a mouse platform (Integrated Rail System, VisualSonics). A midline incision was performed, and uterine horns were gently exteriorized through the incision and carefully drawn through a ParafilmH flap in the bottom of a sterilized Petri dish. Four to five embryos were injected using a micropipette, with 1 μl of SHH overexpression lentivirus for each embryo, and the uterine horn was reinserted into the peritoneal cavity. The abdominal wall and skin were closed with sutures. Expression of the viral construct was induced at E12 by gavage treatment of 200 μl doxycycline (10 mg per ml in sterile water (Sigma-Aldrich) to the mice that were pregnant with the injected pups). The pregnant mice were then fed doxycycline chow (200 mg per kg, Bio-Serv) for 5 days. SHH overexpressed and control embryos were collected at E17 for further analysis.

Immunofluorescence and microscopy

For immunofluorescence, tissues were collected from mice, embedded fresh into OCT (Tissue-Tek; Torrance, CA), and subsequently cut into 10 μm sections using a Leica Cryostat. Slides were fixed for 10 min in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Electron Microscopy Sciences) in phoshpate-buffered saline (PBS) and blocked for 1 h or overnight in PBS with 1% Triton X-100, 1% bovine serum albumin, and 0.25% normal donkey serum. Embryos collected after lentiviral infection for the SHH overexpression experiment were pre-fixed for 7 min in 4% PFA at room temperature. Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking solution and incubations were carried out for 1 h or overnight, followed by incubation in secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were then counterstained with DAPI and mounted using antifade mounting media. For whole-mount immunofluorescence, back skins were collected from newborn mice and placed in 1.26 U per mL dispase (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA) for 4 h at 4 °C. Then, the epidermis was peeled from the dermis and fixed in 4% PFA for 1 h at 4 °C. Skins were blocked with blocking solution for 2 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking solution and incubations were carried out overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation in secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. Skins were then counterstained with DAPI or Hoechst and mounted in antifade mounting media for imaging. TUNEL stainings were performed using the Roche TUNEL kit (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Slides were imaged using a Leica DM5500 upright slide microscope or Confocal Zeiss LSM880 Airyscan microscope using ×10, ×20, or ×40 objectives.

Antibodies

Antibodies were used as follows: KRT14 (generous gift of Julie Segre, National Human Genome Research Institute, MD, USA, 1/20,000); KRT8 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, TROMA-1, 1/500); KRT5 and LHX2 (generous gift of Elaine Fuchs, The Rockefeller University, NY, USA, 1/500); KRT20 (Dako, M7019, 1/70); SOX2 (Stemgent, 09–0024, 1/150); GFP (Abcam, ab13970, 1/1000); RFP (MBL, PM005, 1/4000); E-CADHERIN (Invitrogen, 131900, 1/2000); SOX9 (Abcam, ab185966, 1/500); β-GALACTOSIDASE (Abcam, ab9361, 1/500); CD34 (eBioscience, 14-0341-82, 1/250); AE15 (Santa Cruz, sc 80607, 1/100); AE13 (abcam, ab16113, 1/20); FGFR2 (Cell Signaling, 23328, 1/150); P-CAD (Fisher, BAF761, 1/400); EPCAM (BD Bioscience, 552370, 1/500). For IF, secondary antibodies coupled to Alexa 488, 549, or 649 were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (1/1000).

Quantifications

For quantification of Merkel cells per mm of skin⁵⁹, the length of each section was measured and the number of positively stained cells was counted. Typical section lengths were between 7 and 14 mm. We counted a large number of Merkel cells in the control conditions (>300 KRT8(+) cells) and then counted the number of Merkel cells in a similar length of skin for each mutant line. Typically, at least 100 mm of skin were counted for each condition. Quantification of touch domes (TD): skin samples were stained with KRT8 and six non-overlapping images of 6.55 (Field of view or 2.56 × 2.56) mm² areas of P0 skin per animal were quantified. The mean was calculated and used in statistical analysis. Number of animals used, n≥4. For quantification of the number of Merkel cells per TD, 7 to 10 TDs were randomly chosen from each skin sample. The length of the hair follicles was measured by drawing a line that starts from the bottom of the basal layer and goes to the end of the hair follicle, and measuring the length of the line. Hair follicle length is presented in μm.

Statistics

In all column bar graphs, mean value±one standard deviation is presented. Box-and-whisker plots show first to third quartiles around the median, with whiskers showing minimum–maximum range and outliers presented as individual data points. The number of biological replicates used for comparison is indicated in each figure. To determine the significance between two groups in all experiments, the Mann–Whitney test was performed (GraphPad Prism 5). For all statistical tests, the p < 0.05 level of confidence was accepted for statistical significance, and actual p-values (to four decimal places) were provided in the figure legends. Significance levels were defined as *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; n.s., not significant.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Change history

17 July 2018
The originally published version of this Article contained an error in Figure 2. In panel e, the blue bar was incorrectly labelled ‘KRT8(+)/TOMATO(-)’. Furthermore, during the process of preparing a correction, the publication date of the Article was inadvertently changed to June 20^th 2018. Both of these errors have been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

References

Blanpain, C. & Fuchs, E. Epidermal homeostasis: a balancing act of stem cells in the skin. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 207–217 (2009).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Woo, S. H., Lumpkin, E. A. & Patapoutian, A. Merkel cells and neurons keep in touch. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 74–81 (2015).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Owens, D. M. & Lumpkin, E. A. Diversification and specialization of touch receptors in skin. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med 4, a013656 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Haeberle, H. & Lumpkin, E. A. Merkel cells in somatosensation. Chemosens. Percept. 1, 110–118 (2008).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lumpkin, E. A., Marshall, K. L. & Nelson, A. M. The cell biology of touch. J. Cell Biol. 191, 237–248 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Maksimovic, S. et al. Epidermal Merkel cells are mechanosensory cells that tune mammalian touch receptors. Nature 509, 617–621 (2014).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Woo, S. H. et al. Piezo2 is required for Merkel-cell mechanotransduction. Nature 509, 622–626 (2014).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Maricich, S. M. et al. Merkel cells are essential for light-touch responses. Science 324, 1580–1582 (2009).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Maricich, S. M., Morrison, K. M., Mathes, E. L. & Brewer, B. M. Rodents rely on Merkel cells for texture discrimination tasks. J. Neurosci. 32, 3296–3300 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Halata, Z., Grim, M. & Bauman, K. I. Friedrich Sigmund Merkel and his “Merkel cell”, morphology, development, and physiology: review and new results. Anat. Rec. Part A 271a, 225–239 (2003).
Article Google Scholar
Chalfie, M. Neurosensory mechanotransduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 44–52 (2009).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Szeder, V., Grim, M., Halata, Z. & Sieber-Blum, M. Neural crest origin of mammalian Merkel cells. Dev. Biol. 253, 258–263 (2003).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Van Keymeulen, A. et al. Epidermal progenitors give rise to Merkel cells during embryonic development and adult homeostasis. J. Cell Biol. 187, 91–100 (2009).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Morrison, K. M., Miesegaes, G. R., Lumpkin, E. A. & Maricich, S. M. Mammalian Merkel cells are descended from the epidermal lineage. Dev. Biol. 336, 76–83 (2009).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Woo, S. H., Stumpfova, M., Jensen, U. B., Lumpkin, E. A. & Owens, D. M. Identification of epidermal progenitors for the Merkel cell lineage. Development 137, 3965–3971 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Perdigoto, C. N., Bardot, E. S., Valdes, V. J., Santoriello, F. J. & Ezhkova, E. Embryonic maturation of epidermal Merkel cells is controlled by a redundant transcription factor network. Development 141, 4690–4696 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Activation of beta-catenin signaling programs embryonic epidermis to hair follicle fate. Development 135, 2161–2172 (2008).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Vielkind, U., Sebzda, M. K., Gibson, I. R., & Hardy, M. H. Dynamics of Merkel cell patterns in developing hair follicles in the dorsal skin of mice, demonstrated by a monoclonal antibody to mouse keratin 8. Acta Anat. 152, 93–109 (1995).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ouspenskaia, T., Matos, I., Mertz, A. F., Fiore, V. F. & Fuchs, E. WNT-SHH antagonism specifies and expands stem cells prior to niche formation. Cell 164, 156–169 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Nowak, J. A., Polak, L., Pasolli, H. A. & Fuchs, E. Hair follicle stem cells are specified and function in early skin morphogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 3, 33–43 (2008).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Adam, R. C. et al. Pioneer factors govern super-enhancer dynamics in stem cell plasticity and lineage choice. Nature 521, 366–370 (2015).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Mardaryev, A. N. et al. Lhx2 differentially regulates Sox9, Tcf4 and Lgr5 in hair follicle stem cells to promote epidermal regeneration after injury. Development 138, 4843–4852 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Perdigoto, C. N. et al. Polycomb-mediated repression and sonic Hedgehog signaling interact to regulate Merkel cell specification during skin development. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006151 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Xiao Y., et al. A cascade of Wnt, Eda, and Shh signaling is essential for touch dome Merkel cell development. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006150 (2016).
Zhang, B. et al. Hair follicles’ transit-amplifying cells govern concurrent dermal adipocyte production through Sonic Hedgehog. Gene Dev. 30, 2325–2338 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Rimkus, T. K., Carpenter, R. L., Qasem, S., Chan, M. & Lo, H. W. Targeting the sonic hedgehog signaling pathway: review of smoothened and GLI inhibitors. Cancers 8, E22 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Dassule, H. R., Lewis, P., Bei, M., Maas, R. & McMahon, A. P. Sonic hedgehog regulates growth and morphogenesis of the tooth. Development 127, 4775–4785 (2000).
PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Vidal, V. P. I. et al. Sox9 is essential for outer root sheath differentiation and the formation of the hair stem cell compartment. Curr. Biol. 15, 1340–1351 (2005).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kadaja, M. et al. SOX9: a stem cell transcriptional regulator of secreted niche signaling factors. Gene Dev. 28, 328–341 (2014).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Horsley, V., Aliprantis, A. O., Polak, L., Glimcher, L. H. & Fuchs, E. NFATc1 balances quiescence and proliferation of skin stem cells. Cell 132, 299–310 (2008).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Huh, S. H. et al. Fgf20 governs formation of primary and secondary dermal condensations in developing hair follicles. Gene Dev. 27, 450–458 (2013).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Petiot, A. et al. A crucial role for Fgfr2-IIIb signalling in epidermal development and hair follicle patterning. Development 130, 5493–5501 (2003).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zhang, X. Q. et al. Receptor specificity of the fibroblast growth factor family—the complete mammalian FGF family. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 15694–15700 (2006).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ornitz, D. M. & Itoh, N. The fibroblast growth factor signaling pathway. Wires Dev. Biol. 4, 215–266 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sennett, R. et al. An integrated transcriptome atlas of embryonic hair follicle progenitors, their niche, and the developing skin. Dev. Cell 34, 577–591 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Molotkov, A., Mazot, P., Brewer, J. R., Cinalli, R. M. & Soriano, P. Distinct requirements for FGFR1 and FGFR2 in primitive endoderm development and exit from pluripotency. Dev. Cell 41, 511–526 e514 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Zhang B. & Hsu Y. C. Emerging roles of transit-amplifying cells in tissue regeneration and cancer. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 6, e282 (2017).
Kobielak, K., Pasolli, H. A., Alonso, L., Polak, L. & Fuchs, E. Defining BMP functions in the hair follicle by conditional ablation of BMP receptor IA. J. Cell Biol. 163, 609–623 (2003).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Blanpain, C. & Fuchs, E. Epidermal stem cells of the skin. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 22, 339–373 (2006).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Jenkins, B. A. & Lumpkin, E. A. Developing a sense of touch. Development 144, 4078–4090 (2017).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kapsimali, M. & Barlow, L. A. Developing a sense of taste. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 24, 200–209 (2013).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Groves, A. K. & Fekete, D. M. Shaping sound in space: the regulation of inner ear patterning. Development 139, 245–257 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Rhee, H., Polak, L. & Fuchs, E. Lhx2 maintains stem cell character in hair follicles. Science 312, 1946–1949 (2006).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Levy, V., Lindon, C., Harfe, B. D. & Morgan, B. A. Distinct stem cell populations regenerate the follicle and interfollicular epidermis. Dev. Cell 9, 855–861 (2005).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Mesler, A. L., Veniaminova, N. A., Lull, M. V. & Wong, S. Y. Hair follicle terminal differentiation is orchestrated by distinct early and late matrix progenitors. Cell Rep. 19, 809–821 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Veniaminova, N. A. et al. Keratin 79 identifies a novel population of migratory epithelial cells that initiates hair canal morphogenesis and regeneration. Development 140, 4870–4880 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Brewer, J. R., Mazot, P. & Soriano, P. Genetic insights into the mechanisms of Fgf signaling. Gene Dev. 30, 751–771 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Walsh, C. M., Bautista, D. M. & Lumpkin, E. A. Mammalian touch catches up. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 34, 133–139 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Blakemore, S. J. et al. Tactile sensitivity in Asperger syndrome. Brain Cogn. 61, 5–13 (2006).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Tomchek, S. D. & Dunn, W. Sensory processing in children with and without autism: a comparative study using the short sensory profile. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 61, 190–200 (2007).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Green, H. Cultured cells for the treatment of disease. Sci. Am. 265, 96–102 (1991).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Huh, S. H., Jones, J., Warchol, M. E. & Ornitz, D. M. Differentiation of the lateral compartment of the cochlea requires a temporally restricted FGF20 signal. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001231 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Prochazkova, M. et al. FGF signaling refines Wnt gradients to regulate the patterning of taste papillae. Development 144, 2212–2221 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Xu Z. J., et al. Embryonic attenuated Wnt/beta-catenin signaling defines niche location and long-term stem cell fate in hair follicle. Elife 4, e10567 (2015).
Dauber, K. L. et al. Dissecting the roles of polycomb repressive complex 2 subunits in the control of skin development. J. Invest. Dermatol. 136, 1647–1655 (2016).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ezhkova, E. et al. EZH1 and EZH2 cogovern histone H3K27 trimethylation and are essential for hair follicle homeostasis and wound repair. Genes Dev. 25, 485–498 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Beronja, S., Livshits, G., Williams, S. & Fuchs, E. Rapid functional dissection of genetic networks via tissue-specific transduction and RNAi in mouse embryos. Nat. Med. 16, 821–827 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Hsu, Y. C., Li, L. S. & Fuchs, E. Transit-amplifying cells orchestrate stem cell activity and tissue regeneration. Cell 157, 935–949 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Bardot, E. S. et al. Polycomb subunits Ezh1 and Ezh2 regulate the Merkel cell differentiation program in skin stem cells. EMBO J. 32 1990–2000 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

For help, critical suggestions, reagents, and experimental input, we are grateful to Drs. Elaine Fuchs, Julie Segre, Michael Rendl, Chenleng Cai, Rui Yi, Sergei Ezhkov, and Carolina Perdigoto. We would like to thank Dr. Philippe Soriano for his generous gift of the Fgfr2 floxed and Fgfr2-mCherry mice. We also thank the personnel of the Microscope Facility at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Light Microscopy Unit of the Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki. C.B. is a Merksammer fund scholar. K.L.D.-D. was a trainee of the NIDCR-Interdisciplinary Training Program in Systems and Developmental Biology and Birth Defects T32HD075735. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01 AR063724 (to E.E.) and in part by R01 AR070825 (to Y.-C.H.). This work was funded in part by NIH R35-DE026602 (to O.D.K.) and Sigrid Juselius Foundation and Academy of Finland (Grant no. 1272280) (to M.L.M.). We also thank for NCI P30 Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This work was funded in part by the Smith Family Awards Program, Basil O’Connor Starter Scholar Research Awards, and the Pew Scholar (to Y.-C.H.).

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Minh Binh Nguyen, Idan Cohen.

Authors and Affiliations

Black Family Stem Cell Institute, Department of Cell, Developmental, and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
Minh Binh Nguyen, Idan Cohen, Carmit Bar, Katherine L. Dauber-Decker & Elena Ezhkova
Developmental Biology Program, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland
Vinod Kumar & Marja L. Mikkola
National Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, 102206, China
Zijian Xu & Ting Chen
Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
Pai-Chi Tsai & Ya-Chieh Hsu
Department of Orofacial Sciences and Program in Craniofacial Biology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
Pauline Marangoni & Ophir D. Klein
Department of Pediatrics and Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
Ophir D. Klein

Authors

Minh Binh Nguyen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Idan Cohen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Vinod Kumar
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zijian Xu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Carmit Bar
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Katherine L. Dauber-Decker
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pai-Chi Tsai
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Pauline Marangoni
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ophir D. Klein
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ya-Chieh Hsu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ting Chen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Marja L. Mikkola
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Elena Ezhkova
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.B.N., I.C., and E.E. conceived the experimental plan. M.B.N., I.C., V.K., Z.X., C.B., K.L.D-D., P.M., P-C.T., O.D.K., Y-C.H., M.L.M., and E.E. carried out the experiments. M.B.N., I.C., and E.E. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Ezhkova.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Published online: 13 June 2018

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nguyen, M.B., Cohen, I., Kumar, V. et al. FGF signalling controls the specification of hair placode-derived SOX9 positive progenitors to Merkel cells. Nat Commun 9, 2333 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04399-y

Download citation

Received: 15 September 2017
Accepted: 27 April 2018
Published: 20 June 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04399-y

This article is cited by

Single-cell chromatin landscapes of mouse skin development
- Fang Li
- Tiantian Xu
- Xin Wang
Scientific Data (2022)
A systematic summary of survival and death signalling during the life of hair follicle stem cells
- Xi-Min Hu
- Zhi-Xin Li
- Kun Xiong
Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2021)
LRIG1 is a positive prognostic marker in Merkel cell carcinoma and Merkel cell carcinoma expresses epithelial stem cell markers
- Benjamin Sundqvist
- Harri Sihto
- Virve Koljonen
Virchows Archiv (2021)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.