Abstract
Addressing interfacial effects during specimen preparation in cryogenic electron microscopy remains challenging. Here we introduce ESI-cryoPrep, a specimen preparation method based on electrospray ionization in native mass spectrometry, designed to alleviate issues associated with protein denaturation or preferred orientation induced by macromolecule adsorption at interfaces. Through fine-tuning spraying parameters, we optimized protein integrity preservation and achieved the desired ice thickness for analyzing target macromolecules. With ESI-cryoPrep, we prepared high-quality cryo-specimens of five proteins and obtained three-dimensional reconstructions at near-atomic resolution. Our findings demonstrate that ESI-cryoPrep effectively confines macromolecules within the middle of the thin layer of amorphous ice, facilitating the preparation of blotting-free vitreous samples. The protective mechanism, characterized by the uneven distribution of charged biomolecules of varying sizes within charged droplets, prevents the adsorption of target biomolecules at air–water or graphene–water interfaces, thereby avoiding structural damage to the protein particles or the introduction of dominant orientation issues.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM), a transmission electron microscopy technique that examines cryogenically preserved hydrated specimens, has emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing macromolecular structures in recent years. Recent advancements in both instrumentation and software, including the use of direct electron detection cameras1 and the application of maximum a posteriori processing algorithms2,3 for three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, have led to a ‘resolution revolution’4 in cryo-EM, enabling the direct dissection of atomic-level biological mechanisms through high-resolution 3D density maps. One notable advantage of cryo-EM is its ability to determine macromolecular structures in their more close-to-native states and requires a smaller number of samples compared to other structural biology methods5. This is primarily attributed to the plunge freezing method6,7,8, developed four decades ago, which rapidly freezes macromolecule-containing solutions at liquid nitrogen temperature, yielding cryogenic specimens suitable for cryo-EM analysis.
Obtaining high-quality cryo-specimens is crucial for successful cryo-EM structure determination9. Despite the widespread adoption of cryo-EM nowadays, specimen preparation remains a major challenge, affecting the efficiency and success yield of structural analysis10. The conventional specimen preparation method entails blotting with filter paper11,12, which hinders precise control over the uniformity and reproducibility of vitreous ice thickness and sample distribution13. Regulating the thickness of ice by adjusting blotting time and blotting force is technically challenging and relies heavily on personal experience. When dealing with new target samples, limited guidance from previous experience necessitates multiple trial-and-error experiments to determine the optimal conditions14. A more serious problem emerging with increasing evidence is the adsorption of macromolecules to the air–water interface (AWI) or supporting substrate within the thin solution layer, presenting a substantial challenge for high-resolution cryo-EM structural analysis15,16. This interfacial adsorption can lead to denaturation and/or preferred orientation of target molecules17,18, compromising successful structure determination19,20. Previous attempts to address the issue involved reducing the spot-to-plunge time21. However, the macromolecules inside a liquid layer thinner than 100 nm interact with the AWI at a time scale of milliseconds, still imposing a challenge for cryo-specimen preparation22.
Electrospray ionization (ESI) is a soft ionization technique commonly used in native mass spectrometry (MS) for analyzing liquid-phase proteins23. ESI involves the application of high voltage to a conductive solution, generating charged droplets at atmospheric pressure, which subsequently lead to desolvated macromolecule ions24. Compared to other ionization methods, ESI minimizes damage to the molecules and efficiently ionizes biological macromolecules across a broad size range. The production of multiply charged protein ions by ESI facilitates the study of proteins and related polypeptide fragments in the kilo-Dalton to mega-Dalton range25,26, particularly in mass spectrometers with m/z ranges extending into the thousands. Moreover, nano-ESI offers the advantage of requiring only a minimal solution volume (nl) for quantitative analysis27. While ESI was previously used for cryo-specimen preparation, technological constraints limited the attainment of high-contrast protein sample micrographs and high-resolution 3D structures28.
In this study, we developed a cryo-EM specimen preparation method ESI-cryoPrep using ESI to deposit small droplets of macromolecule solution on EM grids, followed by fast-freezing at liquid nitrogen temperature. The technique uses an electric field to create charged droplets, which undergo fission during flight, followed by the deposition of macromolecule-containing droplets onto the supporting substrate. The use of voltage-assisted spray technology eliminates the requirement for sample blotting with filter paper, and enhances the controllability and repeatability of the cryo-specimen preparation process. Notably, this method simultaneously addresses the challenges of macromolecule adsorption to the AWI and the supporting substrate in cryo-specimen. We anticipate that this hybrid approach will have implications not only for cryo-EM sample preparation but also for the integration of MS and cryo-EM techniques, opening new possibilities for innovative applications.
Results
Design of the ESI-coupled experimental setup
ESI-cryoPrep uses an ESI device to generate liquid droplets on EM grids for cryo-EM specimen preparation (Fig. 1a). The conventional ESI tip, with an outer diameter of approximately 200 μm, features a coaxial configuration consisting of an inner fused capillary for sample delivery and an outer metal capillary for nebulizing gas delivery. A positive high voltage is applied to the metal capillary to produce charged droplets. A metal EM grid covered with reduced graphene oxide (rGO) film29 serves as the supporting substrate as well as the counter (negative) electrode for spray. The application of a high electric potential difference leads to the formation of a Taylor cone30 at the spray tip, generating charged droplets with or without the assistance of nebulizing gas31. During the flight of the droplets toward the EM grid, the droplets undergo solvent evaporation and droplet fission on charges exceeding the Rayleigh stability limit32,33 (Fig. 1b).
An optimal condition can be achieved by adjusting parameters such as sample solution injection flow rate, spray voltage, sample concentration and nebulizing gas flow rate. To mitigate the impact of high electrolyte concentration and prevent crystallization during desolvation, NaCl salt in the buffer solution is replaced with volatile ammonium acetate salt. Real-time monitoring of temperature and humidity during droplet formation is conducted using installed sensors. The droplet deposition process is observed using a high-frame-rate CCD camera (Fig. 1c,d). Subsequently, the droplets collected on the EM grid are vitrified through manual plunging in liquid ethane cooled by liquid nitrogen for cryo-EM analysis.
It is commonly asserted that charges on an electrospray (ES) droplet are evenly spaced across its surface to minimize electrostatic potential energy, stabilized by Coulomb repulsion forces34. Previous research has proposed the formation of an electrochemical equilibrium charge layer at the liquid–gas interface, as described by the Poisson–Boltzmann equation35. This layer, with a thickness on the order of Debye’s length, may potentially repel protonated proteins from the liquid surface, thereby preserving high-resolution features for structural analysis.
Optimization of ESI conditions for specimen preparation
We optimized the conditions for specimen preparation by adjusting various parameters for ESI, mainly including solution injection flow rate, spray voltage, sample concentration and landing distance from the capillary tip to the grid. These parameters are crucial in maintaining the native status of macromolecules during droplet formation. The introduction of nebulizing gas also influences the preservation of native structures. To assess the spraying performance, we examined the percentage of intact proteins under different parameters using apo-ferritin as a testing model by negative staining EM and native MS analysis (Extended Data Figs. 1 and 2).
To control the size of initial droplets generated from the ESI tip, we varied the solution injection flow rate at a level of several hundred nl min−1, comparable with what is typically used for liquid chromatography with MS analysis. Intact apo-ferritin particles, characterized by a circular shape with a central hole in their conformation, were considered suitable for subsequent cryo-EM analysis. A reduction in the flow rate to less than 100 nl min−1 exhibited a noticeable decrease in the percentage of intact proteins (Extended Data Fig. 1a,b). Furthermore, MS analysis revealed charge state shifts in the protein ions, signifying the unfolding of macromolecules (Extended Data Fig. 2a). The optimized flow rate range was determined to be 100 to 300 nl min−1, striking a balance between particle preservation and ice layer thickness. We also observed that proteins are more prone to denaturing at higher spray voltage and lower target protein concentrations.
We screened various spray voltages to achieve a steady droplet mist while minimizing disruption to the protein structure. Although higher voltages facilitate smoother spraying, they pose a higher risk of electric discharge and damage to the protein structure. We found that a spray voltage of 3 kV is optimal for preserving intact proteins while maintaining a steady spray. Adjusting the distance between the ESI tip and the EM grid allowed us to control ionization progression and minimize the excessive loss on the collecting plane. The distance between the ESI tip and the receiving end was 1–1.5 cm. With a sampling time of tens of seconds, the accumulated volume of liquid droplets on the grid surface was controlled within the range of 25–50 nl. Severe impairment, indicated by the appearance of collapsed or scattered dots in raw micrographs, was observed with the introduction of N2 gas flow, indicating the relatively detrimental effects of an increased degree of desolvation. The percentage of well-shaped particles markedly decreased with increased gas flow rates. At higher gas flow rates, charge states for 24-subunit particles shifted to higher values with the detected peaks of globular proteins substantially broader, and the signal for two-subunit particles became more prominent, all indicating severe damage to the proteins.
Nano-ESI was also explored as an alternative solution for comparison. It uses borosilicate glass capillaries with a pulled spray tip (1–4 μm) to generate charged droplets with sizes less than 100 nm, 100–1,000 times smaller than those by the conventional ESI. We compared the performance of gold coating or metal (stainless steel or platinum) electrodes for applying the high spray voltage and observed that platinum electrode preserved the highest proportion of intact proteins in both EM and native MS analyses (Extended Data Figs. 1a,b and 2f). This is likely due to the chemical inertness of platinum. By contrast, stainless steel is more prone to causing electrochemical reactions on proteins, therefore damaging protein structures severely.
Cryo-EM analysis of ESI-cryoPrep specimens
The evaluation process mentioned above by negative staining EM and native MS provided valuable insights into the key parameters for cryo-EM specimen preparation. The spraying conditions were modified to ensure intact protein samples and the attainment of an optimal thickness of the vitreous ice layer. Subsequently, we assessed the efficacy of the ESI-cryoPrep method for high-resolution cryo-EM analysis using five model macromolecules: 70S ribosome, 20S proteasome, apo-ferritin, human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and streptavidin encompassing a wide range of molecular weights and biochemical properties.
Initial examination of these cryo-EM specimens under transmission electron microscope at different magnifications allowed for the assessment of droplet distribution and vitreous ice thickness (Fig. 2a–c). All four samples, 70S ribosome, 20S proteasome, apo-ferritin and ACE2, exhibited very thick areas in the center of the grid montage (Fig. 2a). It was observed that the suitable ice thickness for data acquisition displayed a gradient of contrast away from the dark zones on the grid atlas, while the contrast remained relatively consistent within the same square for most holes (Fig. 2b). High-magnification micrographs with thin ice and fast Fourier transforms revealed distinct particle features even at low defocus values (Fig. 2c). In areas with optimal ice thickness, cryo-specimens demonstrated particle distribution in a single layer with relatively uniform ice thickness, as confirmed by both single-particle analysis (SPA) and 3D cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) analysis (Fig. 2d). The particle distribution ranged from 15–30 nm, aligning favorably with the diameter of the proteins (10 to 26 nm), indicating an optimal ice thickness that minimizes background noise in the vitreous ice.
We acquired cryo-EM micrographs of the specimens and performed image processing for the five types of macromolecule, resulting in 3D reconstructions of the 70S ribosome, 20S proteasome, apo-ferritin, ACE2 and streptavidin at resolutions of 2.7, 2.0, 2.1, 3.3 and 1.9 Å, respectively (Fig. 3a–e, top). When performing 3D reconstruction at comparable particle levels, the ESI-cryoPrep method demonstrated notably superior resolution in the 3D density maps compared to the control (Extended Data Fig. 3). The estimated B factors of the five specimens were determined as 50, 62, 68, 100 and 52 Å2, respectively. The cryo-EM 3D density maps exhibited sufficient quality for unambiguous atomic modeling (Fig. 3a–e, bottom). Notably, in the regions of the highest resolution, fine features such as holes in tyrosine benzene rings and extended signals of side chains of arginine, isoleucine, valine and serine were clearly resolved. The successful reconstruction of these specimens demonstrated the effectiveness of the ESI-cryoPrep method in preserving the natural structure of macromolecules.
Particle distribution in specimens prepared by ESI-cryoPrep
To evaluate the particle distribution in ESI-cryoPrep specimens, we analyzed and compared the above datasets that yielded successful cryo-EM reconstructions with those obtained from conventional cryo-specimen preparation. ESI-cryoPrep specimens exhibited a higher proportion of particles contributing to high-resolution reconstruction compared to the conventionally prepared specimens (Extended Data Fig. 4). Previous studies have indicated that protein particles tend to adsorb at the AWI17 and potentially at the supporting film interface15,20, which can lead to damage and/or preferential orientations of macromolecule particles, compromising high-resolution SPA reconstruction. To investigate the influence of interfaces (both air–liquid interface and solid–liquid interface) on particle distribution, we compared the particle angular orientation of the five macromolecule specimens prepared using ESI-cryoPrep and conventional methods. The angular orientation heatmaps of the five macromolecule types (70S ribosome with C1 symmetry, 20S proteasome with D7 symmetry, apo-ferritin with O symmetry, ACE2 with C1 symmetry and streptavidin with D2 symmetry) demonstrated that ESI-cryoPrep specimens notably enhanced angular projection coverage and increased sampling rates of Fourier components across most viewing directions. This is in stark contrast to the angular orientations of the same macromolecules prepared using the conventional method on supporting films (Fig. 5d and Extended Data Fig. 5).
The observed angular distribution prompted further investigation of particle distribution near the air–liquid and solid–liquid interfaces in the ESI-cryoPrep specimens. Spatial arrangement analysis of particles was conducted using cryo-ET, where multiple tomograms were collected for each macromolecule specimen. Through tilt-series alignment, automated particle selection and subtomogram averaging, the averaged structure was mapped back to the tomograms with determined xyz coordinates and calculated orientation information. Previous studies have shown that particles in conventional methods with supporting films were distributed on both interfaces36. However, in the ESI-cryoPrep specimens, particles were observed to be arranged within the middle of the thin ice and not directly attached to either interface. Figure 4a illustrates that in each representative tomogram, particles from the four test samples were distributed in a thin monoplane, consistent across all collected tomograms. They were arranged more condensed in the middle of the vitreous ice. The zx slice of tomograms for the four types of macromolecule prepared by ESI-cryoPrep revealed that particles distributed slightly closer to the graphene side but not attached to the AWI. The spacing between the lower edge of particles and the graphene layer is estimated to be approximately 4–6 slices, corresponding to a range of approximately 2–3 nm (Extended Data Figs. 6 and 7). A representative result demonstrated that apo-ferritin particles packed predominantly in a monoplane and fully embedded within the vitreous ice (Fig. 4b).
To obtain more comprehensive statistical results regarding particle distribution in the specimen, we used per-particle defocus values derived from refining contrast transfer function (CTF) parameters during SPA. This precise calculation of particle height within the ice layer was achieved through the determination of per-particle defocus values, refined based on phase residuals. The alignment of variations in particle defocus with their respective z heights in vitreous ice was instrumental in our analysis. We used least-squares plane fitting37 to extrapolate particle distribution patterns and gauge ice thickness across the entire SPA dataset, which contributed to high-resolution 3D reconstruction. This analysis was applied to datasets from ESI-cryoPrep specimens as well as specimens prepared using the conventional method on graphene-based supporting films or in suspending ice.
As a negative control for particle distribution in suspending ice, the apo-ferritin dataset (EMPIAR-10424) was analyzed in a similar way. The z heights of apo-ferritin particles were depicted in barplots and subsequently fitted using the kernel density estimation (KDE) method. The z height plots from two distinct micrographs of the apo-ferritin sample (Fig. 5a, purple) demonstrated nonuniform distributions with inverted symmetry and high absolute skewness values. Each plot exhibited a steep and gentle slope on either side of the peak, indicating particle adsorption at both AWIs. The intense distribution and steep slope corresponded to densely adsorbed protein complexes, while the long tail suggested freely scattering particles distributed away from the interfaces. The distributions also demonstrate the deviations of the mode from the mean and the large absolute value of the skewness.
A similar analysis was performed for apo-ferritin, ACE2 and streptavidin on supporting films prepared using the conventional preparation method, displaying characteristics consistent with particles adhering to either the AWI or graphene–water interface (GWI) (Fig. 5a, green). The distribution with a higher proportion of skewed sides, signifying dominant adsorption, hints at potential adsorption at the air or graphene interfaces. Notably, the bimodal distributions of the z height of apo-ferritin particles on rGO grids suggested protein adsorption at both the AWI and GWI.
The same analysis was applied to the ESI-cryoPrep specimens, where the KDE fits of the datasets were characterized by relatively symmetric (Gaussian-like) peaks, with only a small fraction of extreme values (Fig. 5a, blue). This observation strongly indicates that particles in the ESI-cryoPrep specimens are predominantly embedded within the central region of the vitreous ice, showing minimal adsorption at the AWI or GWI.
To ensure an unbiased representation of micrographs, the entire dataset was considered for statistical analysis. In probability theory and mathematical statistics, moments of a function serve as quantitative measures characterizing the shape of a set of points (X) within that function. Skewness, the third central moment, quantitatively measures the degree of asymmetry in a distribution. Negative skewness commonly denotes a left-skewed distribution, while positive skewness indicates a right-skewed distribution in the case of a unimodal distribution. A skewness value of zero suggests a symmetric distribution, where the mean, median and mode coincide, and gains or losses on each side exhibit equal frequency. As a guideline, skewness values less than −1 or greater than 1 indicate a highly skewed distribution, values between −1 and −0.5 or between 0.5 and 1 suggest moderate skewness, and values between −0.5 and 0.5 indicate an approximately symmetric distribution.
Skewness distributions were examined for control data (apo-ferritin in suspending ice, apo-ferritin, ACE2 and streptavidin with supporting films) and ESI-cryoPrep data of 70S ribosome, 20S proteasome, apo-ferritin, ACE2 and streptavidin, respectively (Fig. 5b). Notably, skewed distributions were observed for particles on UltraAuFoil gold grids (apo-ferritin data, EMPIAR-10424) and the conventional method with supporting films, displaying more pronounced asymmetry on either side compared to ESI-cryoPrep data. In contrast, the distribution of ESI-cryoPrep data appeared more symmetrical. In ESI-cryoPrep data, the positive z heights of the 70S ribosome, 20S proteasome and ACE2 correspond to the AWIs, while the positive z heights of the apo-ferritin and streptavidin correspond to the GWIs. The statistical results support the notion that the z heights of most particles in the ESI-cryoPrep dataset were distributed more symmetrically (Fig. 5c), consistent with results from the single micrograph data.
Working model for the ESI-cryoPrep method
The present cryo-sample preparation technique using ESI involves the generation of charged microdroplets from a protein solution38. ESI operates at atmospheric pressure where the analyte solution is infused into a metal capillary held at a positive electric potential of several thousand volts. The solution forms a Taylor cone at the capillary tip, emitting fine mist droplets when the Raleigh limit is reached. These initial droplets, with micrometer-scale radii, carry an excess of positive charge primarily from protonated ions39,40. The charge density experiences a pronounced increase during solvent evaporation as they migrate toward the supporting substrate (Fig. 6a). It is established in the ESI process that small ions are inclined to accumulate at the surface of charged droplets, eventually transforming into dry ions through ion evaporation39,41. By contrast, large, multiply charged and highly hydrophilic protein ions reside at the center, becoming dry ions after the evaporation of water and small ions. This phenomenon is known as the charge residue model42,43. In the ESI-cryoPrep method, the charge residue model mechanism aids in distributing protein ions away from both the AWI and GWI on landing on the supporting substrate, ultimately preserving their native forms.
On impact with a stationary solid surface, droplets undergo deformation influenced by inertial force, viscous force and surface tension. Various droplet characteristics, including size, velocity and surface morphology, affect their behavior on collision, such as deposition, spreading, bouncing or splattering44. In the case of electrospray, droplets of varying sizes and velocities undergo a complex collision process with the substrate. Previous research demonstrated the measurement of kinetic energy gain in charged particles moving within an electric field45. The collision process involves the conversion of kinetic energy and potential energy before collision into kinetic energy, potential energy and work done by friction after collision, following the law of conservation of energy. Droplets spread on collision, experiencing a substantial increase in surface potential energy, consuming most of their initial kinetic energy, while another portion of the kinetic energy dissipates as frictional work. Assuming an initially spherical droplet with a near-zero incident angle, on impact with the substrate, the droplet spreads bilaterally, creating a thicker central region and thinner regions at the sides.
Adjacent droplets can merge, forming a water bridge through wetting effects (Fig. 6b). The exposed surface of a spherical droplet encounters inward forces, leading to contraction until it reaches a limit that is determined by the surface tension. When two droplets merge, the reduction in surface area decreases total surface energy, releasing the remaining energy. Electrostatic attraction between positively charged droplets and the negatively charged grid surface overcomes surface tension, facilitating further spreading and wetting of the droplets.
As demonstrated above, the ESI-cryoPrep approach proficiently confines macromolecules within the core of vitreous ice, preventing the adherence of target molecules to the AWI or GWI. This phenomenon is presumably attributed to uneven ion distributions in terms of particle sizes and charges46,47,48, akin to mechanisms discussed earlier for ion evaporation and charge residual models in the ESI process. Merged droplets on the substrate retain excessive charges, preventing protein ions from reaching AWI and substrate–water interfaces, as depicted in Fig. 6c.
Discussion
In ESI of MS, analytes transit from the condensed phase to the gas phase and undergo ionization. Previous studies assumed that the charged water droplets produced in the final Coulomb fission event, containing a neutral macromolecule, would be slightly larger than the macromolecule. Consequently, during the final solvent evaporation, all droplet charges would be transferred to the macromolecule’s surface. In our setup, the droplets containing macromolecules are not fully evaporated into the gas phase, therefore the molecules stay fully immersed in the liquid, with much less protonation in comparison with their gaseous ionic states. As demonstrated above, the relatively less protonated macromolecules maintain their high-resolution native structures in the small droplets produced by ESI. This actually provides evidence of the native preservation of the macromolecules in ESI-MS.
As proposed in our hypothetical model to explain electrochemical reactions and their effects on protein structures under different conditions, electrostatic forces and the conversion of kinetic energy to surface potential generated an ice layer with a thickness gradient, advantageous for accommodating protein complexes of various sizes. Euler angle distributions for the five macromolecule specimens demonstrated markedly improved angular projection coverage in Fourier space. The nature of excessively charged droplets in ESI-cryoPrep shielded protein particles from interfacial effects, ensuring their full embedding within the ice layer without adhesion to interfaces. Unlike recent inventions relying on self-wicking nano-wire grids, ESI-cryoPrep uses regular EM grids with conductive supporting films, enabling additional investigations using tilt scheme or cryo-ET.
Cryo-EM captures multiple macromolecular conformational states, offering opportunities for time-space-resolved studies. The ESI-cryoPrep technique, with precise instrument tuning, can potentially study fast molecular events in a time-resolved manner. Time-resolved samples can be prepared using conventional methods or a dual-jet system for mixing reactants on the EM mesh. The ESI-cryoPrep method offers additional potential benefits in high-resolution cryo-EM analysis, preparing specimens for biochemical reactions and coupling MS analysis with cryo-EM.
The nanospray needle in nano-ESI, with an outer diameter in the order of tens of nanometers, generates nanoscale initial droplets with a high desolvation tendency, facilitating the production of extremely small final droplets for the analysis of ultrathin samples. However, nano-ESI encounters challenges due to notable electrochemical effects under current conditions, causing particle dissociation and potential vaporization of the thin fluid film. The potential of nano-ESI under softer electrospray conditions is yet to be determined.
We anticipate that the relatively low cost and ease of maintenance make the ESI-cryoPrep suitable for broader application, with potential expansion to various laboratories and research institutions. Future exploration will include diverse protein samples, such as membrane proteins and tiny crystals, advancing cryo-EM sample preparation.
Methods
ESI-cryoPrep specimen preparation
The 70S ribosomes and streptavidin were purchased from the NEB company (catalog nos. P0763S and N7021S), while Thermoplasma acidophilum 20S proteasomes49, human heavy-chain apo-ferritins50 and human ACE2 (ref. 51) were prepared as previously described, respectively. Optimal conditions for ESI-cryoPrep cryogenic specimen preparation were adopted in the following experiments. The ESI needle was connected to the positive electrode of a d.c. power supply (+3 kV), and 20 μl macromolecule solution (diluted with 100 mM ammonium acetate solutions to a concentration of about 0.5–4 μM) was injected using a precise and stable automatic injection device (Supplementary Table 1). The negative electrode was connected to the tweezer holding the metal grid (covered with a layer of rGO as supporting films), which had previously been subjected to glow discharge at a medium current for 12 s in a Harrick Plasma instrument (Supplementary Table 2). At a moderate injection flow rate (100–300 nl min−1) and a sampling duration of tens of seconds, we maintained the cumulative volume of liquid droplets on the grid surface within the range of 25–50 nl (Supplementary Fig. 1). The grids were then either rapidly stained with droplets of 3% uranyl acetate for negative staining EM analysis or manual frozen in nitrogen-cooled liquid ethane for cryo-EM analysis.
Negative-staining electron microscopy
The prepared negatively stained grids of apo-ferritin were screened on a Tecnai F20 Twin microscope (FEI) operating at 200 kV, using a 4,000 CCD camera (Gatan, Inc.) at a nominal magnification of ×50,000 with a calibrated pixel size of 1.7 Å per pixel. Two-dimensional (2D) class averages were initially generated by manually picking particles from the binned raw micrographs, which were then used as templates for automatic particle picking using template matching in RELION. Picked particles were then extracted and a subset of particles was selected from the 2D classification output. The proportion of intact particles was calculated by dividing the number of selected particles after 2D classification by the number of particles picked from template matching.
Single-particle cryo-EM data collection and preprocessing
The 70S ribosome, 20S proteasome and apo-ferritin dataset were collected on a Titan Krios microscope (FEI) equipped with a Gatan K3 Summit camera operating at 300 kV. The ACE2 and streptavidin datasets were collected on a Titan Krios microscope (FEI) equipped with a GIF Quantum energy filter (slit width 20 eV) operating at 300 kV. Videos were recorded in super-resolution mode on the K3 Summit direct electron detector (Gatan, Inc.) with a micrograph size of 11,520 × 8,184 pixels and calibrated pixel sizes of 0.485 Å (70S ribosome, 20S proteasome and apo-ferritin), 0.4187 Å (ACE2) and 0.2595 Å (streptavidin) per super-resolution pixel. The micrographs were taken with defocus at a range of −0.7 to −1.4 μm. The exposure dose per frame was 1.5625 e−/Å2 therefore the total exposure dose of each video was 50 e−/Å2 with 32 frames. The total exposure time was set to 2.56 s at 0.08 s per frame (70S ribosome, 20S proteasome and apo-ferritin), and 1.28 s at 0.04 s per frame (ACE2) and 0.43 s at 0.0133 s per frame (streptavidin). Data acquisition and preprocessing were performed with AutoEMation52, SerialEM53 and the facility’s homemade wrapper TsinghuaTitan.py.
Image processing
Super-resolution videos were motion-corrected using the MotionCor2 program54 with an 11 × 11 patch number, and then downsampled with Fourier cropping by a factor of 2 to a pixel size of 0.97 Å (70S ribosome, 20S proteasome and apo-ferritin), 0.8374 Å (ACE2) and 0.5191 Å (streptavidin) per counted pixel. For details, refer to Supplementary Table 3. Parameters of the micrographs’ CTF were estimated by an exhaustive search with CTFFIND4.1 (ref. 55) and Gctf56. Micrographs with even particle distribution and uniform vitreous ice were manually screened.
Particle picking was performed by template matching in RELION-4.0 (ref. 57) and CNN-based automatic picking in Topaz58, which incorporates a deep learning model. Particles were extracted at a binning of twofold to speed up alignment and classification. A simplified scheme for image processing procedures is presented in the Extended Data Figs. 7–10. Initial models were calculated from the 1,000-particle dataset using the stochastic gradient descent algorithm in the CryoSPARC59 program package or downloaded from the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) and low-pass filtered to 45 Å to prevent model bias. The 2D and 3D analyses were performed in RELION-3.1 (ref. 60), RELION-4.0 (ref. 57), RELION-5.0 (ref. 61) and CryoSPARC59. CTF and aberration refinement, and Bayesian polishing were performed as standard procedures to increase the final resolution and reduce the B factor value of the reconstruction error. The final resolution was determined by the cutoff of Fourier shell correlation (FSC) at 0.143 (ref. 62), and the highest resolution reconstruction, determined by the gold-standard FSC between two half-maps from two independently sampled subsets, went through multiple trials of CTF refinement and Bayesian polishing iterations. The five types of macromolecule, 70S ribosome, 20S proteasome, apo-ferritin, ACE2 and streptavidin, were reconstructed at final resolutions of 2.77, 2.04, 2.15, 3.28 and 1.95 Å, respectively. Validations of the local resolution were assessed through a wrapper in RELION and ResMap63. The maps colored by local resolution were rendered with UCSF Chimera and ChimeraX64.
Crystal structures from previous studies were aligned and fitted to 3D maps in ChimeraX, then refined in PHENIX. The structures include those of the 70S ribosome (Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID 6W6P), 20S proteasome (PDB 1PMA), apo-ferritin (PDB 1FHA), ACE2 (PDB 1R42) and streptavidin (PDB 7DY0). The crystal structures fit the reconstructions well for most regions, except for the two alpha helices of ACE2, which required refinement of their relative angles to the rest of the structure. Models for the 70S ribosome, 20S proteasome, apo-ferritin and streptavidin were manually fitted using COOT65, followed by real-space refinement with restraints of secondary structure and noncrystallographic symmetry using PHENIX66. The atomic model of ACE2 was generated using cryoNet (https://cryonet.ai/), a differentiable neural network-based model-building software.
Particle distribution analysis
The Euler angle distributions of 3D reconstructions were plotted using 2D heatmaps from two given Euler angles (AngleRot, AngleTilt) calculated in RELION. The angular sampling ranges of structures with symmetry (D7 for 20S proteasome, O symmetry for apo-ferritin and D2 for streptavidin) were taken into account in the final heatmap.
Particles were plotted in 3D graphics according to x, y and z coordinates, showing the spatial distribution of inclined planes relative to the xy plane. Simply dealing with variations in per-particle defocus values failed to provide realistic ice thickness and 3D particle distribution patterns. The least-squares plane fitting was applied to fit a plane that could best characterize the spatial distribution of most particles. The histogram of the distances from particles to the fitted plane was used to detect whether the particles were distributed in single or double layers. The ice thickness was calculated from the extent of most particles (80%) in the direction orthogonal to the fitted plane. The degree of asymmetry of the KDE fit was measured through the third central moment, skewness. The higher the absolute value is, the more asymmetric the KDE fit, meaning particles are adsorbed onto the interfaces with a steeper slope and abundant amounts.
Cryo-ET data collection and reconstruction
Cryo-ET data were acquired using the Titan Krios 300 kV electron microscope (FEI) equipped with a 20 eV slit-width energy filter (for ACE2) or without the energy filter (for 70S ribosome, 20S proteasome and apo-ferritin) and automatedly collected with SerialEM software53. Tilt series were recorded in super-resolution mode at nominal magnifications of ×23,000 and ×64,000, with calibrated pixel sizes of 0.625 Å (for 70S ribosome, 20S proteasome and apo-ferritin) and 0.6795 Å (for ACE2) per super-resolution pixel, respectively. Data collection used a dose symmetric tilt scheme ranging from −40° to 40°, or −50° to 50° with a 3° base increment and defocus cycling from −4.8 to −5.2 μm, or −2.8 to −3.4 μm. Each tilt angle was recorded with eight frames (0.213 s per frame), and the total dose for each tilt series was 81 or 105 e−/Å2. Stage shift and beam-induced motion were corrected using MotionCor2 (ref. 54), and tomograms were aligned and reconstructed in IMOD67. Automated 3D particle picking was performed using Dynamo68. The 3D reconstruction and mapping of the sample particles were refined with EMAN69 and RELION-4.0 (ref. 57).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The following publicly available data were used in the paper: apo-ferritin control dataset EMPIAR-10424. Crystal structures determined in previous work were aligned and fit to 3D maps in ChimeraX and then real-space refined in PHENIX for 70S ribosome (PDB ID 6W6P), 20S proteasome (PDB 1PMA), apo-ferritin (PDB 1FHA), ACE2 (PDB 1R42) and streptavidin (PDB 7DY0). The coordinates of the ACE2 cryo-EM structure were deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession no. PDB 8JWH. The corresponding cryo-EM map was deposited in the EMDB under accession EMD-36683. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Faruqi, A. R. & Henderson, R. Electronic detectors for electron microscopy. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 549–555 (2007).
Scheres, S. H. A Bayesian view on cryo-EM structure determination. J. Mol. Biol. 415, 406–418 (2012).
Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012).
Kuhlbrandt, W. Biochemistry. The resolution revolution. Science 343, 1443–1444 (2014).
Nogales, E. The development of cryo-EM into a mainstream structural biology technique. Nat. Methods 13, 24–27 (2016).
Taylor, K. A. & Glaeser, R. M. Electron-microscopy of frozen hydrated biological specimens. J. Ultra Mol. Struct. R. 55, 448–456 (1976).
Dubochet, J. & Mcdowall, A. W. Vitrification of pure water for electron-microscopy. J. Microsc. 124, Rp3–Rp4 (1981).
Dubochet, J. et al. Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens. Q. Rev. Biophys. 21, 129–228 (1988).
Glaeser, R. M. Preparing better samples for cryo-electron microscopy: biochemical challenges do not end with isolation and purification. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 90, 451–474 (2021).
Weissenberger, G., Henderikx, R. J. M. & Peters, P. J. Understanding the invisible hands of sample preparation for cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 18, 463–471 (2021).
Dubochet, J., Lepault, J., Freeman, R., Berriman, J. A. & Homo, J. C. Electron-microscopy of frozen water and aqueous-solutions. J. Microsc. 128, 219–237 (1982).
Bellare, J. R., Davis, H. T., Scriven, L. E. & Talmon, Y. Controlled environment vitrification system—an improved sample preparation technique. J. Electron Micr Tech. 10, 87–111 (1988).
Armstrong, M. et al. Microscale fluid behavior during cryo-EM sample blotting. Biophys. J. 118, 708–719 (2020).
Carragher, B. et al. Current outcomes when optimizing ‘standard’ sample preparation for single-particle cryo-EM. J. Microsc. 276, 39–45 (2019).
Glaeser, R. M. & Han, B. G. Opinion: hazards faced by macromolecules when confined to thin aqueous films. Biophys. Rep. 3, 1–7 (2017).
Glaeser, R. M. Proteins, interfaces, and cryo-EM grids. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 34, 1–8 (2018).
Noble, A. J. et al. Routine single particle CryoEM sample and grid characterization by tomography. eLife 7, e34257 (2018).
Chen, J., Noble, A. J., Kang, J. Y. & Darst, S. A. Eliminating effects of particle adsorption to the air/water interface in single-particle cryo-electron microscopy: bacterial RNA polymerase and CHAPSO. J. Struct. Biol. X 1, 100005 (2019).
Donaldson, T. L., Boonstra, E. F. & Hammond, J. M. Kinetics of protein denaturation at gas-liquid interfaces. J. Colloid Inter. Sci. 74, 441–450 (1980).
D’Imprima, E. et al. Protein denaturation at the air-water interface and how to prevent it. eLife 8, e42747 (2019).
Noble, A. J. et al. Reducing effects of particle adsorption to the air-water interface in cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 15, 793–795 (2018).
Taylor, K. A. & Glaeser, R. M. Retrospective on the early development of cryoelectron microscopy of macromolecules and a prospective on opportunities for the future. J. Struct. Biol. 163, 214–223 (2008).
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F. & Whitehouse, C. M. Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science 246, 64–71 (1989).
Whitehouse, C. M., Dreyer, R. N., Yamashita, M. & Fenn, J. B. Electrospray interface for liquid chromatographs and mass spectrometers. Anal. Chem. 57, 675–679 (1985).
Wong, S. F., Meng, C. K. & Fenn, J. B. Multiple charging in electrospray ionization of poly(ethylene glycols). J. Phys. Chem. 92, 546–550 (1988).
Kebarle, P. A brief overview of the present status of the mechanisms involved in electrospray mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 35, 804–817 (2000).
Marginean, I. et al. Analytical characterization of the electrospray ion source in the nanoflow regime. Anal. Chem. 80, 6573–6579 (2008).
White, H. D., Thirumurugan, K., Walker, M. L. & Trinick, J. A second generation apparatus for time-resolved electron cryo-microscopy using stepper motors and electrospray. J. Struct. Biol. 144, 246–252 (2003).
Nan, L. et al. Reduced graphene oxide membrane as supporting film for high-resolution cryo-EM. Biophysics Rep. 7, 227–238 (2021).
Taylor, G. Disintegration of water drops in electric field. Proc. R. Soc. Lon Ser.-A 280, 383 (1964).
Konermann, L., Ahadi, E., Rodriguez, A. D. & Vahidi, S. Unraveling the mechanism of electrospray ionization. Anal. Chem. 85, 2–9 (2013).
Rayleigh, L. XX. On the equilibrium of liquid conducting masses charged with electricity. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 14, 184–186 (1882).
Taflin, D. C., Ward, T. L. & Davis, E. J. Electrified droplet fission and the rayleigh limit. Langmuir 5, 376–384 (1989).
Fenn, J. B. Ion formation from charged droplets - roles of geometry, energy, and time. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectr. 4, 524–535 (1993).
Ganan-Calvo, A. M. On the theory of electrohydrodynamically driven capillary jets. J. Fluid Mech. 335, 165–188 (1997).
Fan, X. et al. Single particle cryo-EM reconstruction of 52 kDa streptavidin at 3.2 Angstrom resolution. Nat. Commun. 10, 2386 (2019).
Shakarji, C. M. Least-squares fitting algorithms of the NIST algorithm testing system. J. Res Natl Inst. Stand Technol. 103, 633–641 (1998).
Kebarle, P. & Verkerk, U. H. Electrospray: from ions in solution to ions in the gas phase, what we know now. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 28, 898–917 (2009).
Wilm, M. Principles of electrospray ionization. Mol. Cell Proteom. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.009407 (2011).
Kebarle, P. & Tang, L. From ions in solution to ions in the gas-phase—the mechanism of electrospray mass-spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 65, A972–A986 (1993).
Iribarne, J. & Thomson, B. On the evaporation of small ions from charged droplets. J. Chem. Phys. 64, 2287–2294 (1976).
de la Mora, J. F. Electrospray ionization of large multiply charged species proceeds via Dole’s charged residue mechanism. Anal. Chim. Acta 406, 93–104 (2000).
Iavarone, A. T. & Williams, E. R. Mechanism of charging and supercharging molecules in electrospray ionization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 2319–2327 (2003).
Mundo, C., Sommerfeld, M. & Tropea, C. Droplet-wall collisions—experimental studies of the deformation and breakup process. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 21, 151–173 (1995).
Markert, C. et al. Observation of charged droplets from electrospray ionization (ESI) plumes in API mass spectrometers. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 413, 5587–5600 (2021).
Beveridge, R. et al. Ion mobility mass spectrometry uncovers the impact of the patterning of oppositely charged residues on the conformational distributions of intrinsically disordered proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 4908–4918 (2019).
Christofi, E. & Barran, P. Ion mobility mass spectrometry (IM-MS) for structural biology: insights gained by measuring mass, charge, and collision cross section. Chem. Rev. 123, 2902–2949 (2023).
Kebarle, P. & Peschke, M. On the mechanisms by which the charged droplets produced by electrospray lead to gas phase ions. Anal. Chim. Acta 406, 11–35 (2000).
Li, X. M. et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 10, 584–590 (2013).
Fan, X. et al. Near-atomic resolution structure determination in over-focus with volta phase plate by Cs-corrected Cryo-EM. Structure 25, 1623–1630.e3 (2017).
Lan, J. et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 581, 215 (2020).
Lei, J. L. & Frank, J. Automated acquisition of cryo-electron micrographs for single particle reconstruction on an FEI Tecnai electron microscope. J. Struct. Biol. 150, 69–80 (2005).
Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
Zhang, K. Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
Kimanius, D., Dong, L. Y., Sharov, G., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. New tools for automated cryo-EM single-particle analysis in RELION-4.0. Biochem. J. 478, 4169–4185 (2021).
Bepler, T. et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat. Methods 16, 1153–1160 (2019).
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
Dari, K. et al. Data-driven regularisation lowers the size barrier of cryo-EM structure determination. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.23.563586 (2023).
Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).
Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63–65 (2014).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. 66, 486–501 (2010).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Struct. Biol. 66, 213–221 (2010).
Kremer, J. R., Mastronarde, D. N. & McIntosh, J. R. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996).
Castano-Diez, D., Kudryashev, M., Arheit, M. & Stahlberg, H. Dynamo: a flexible, user-friendly development tool for subtomogram averaging of cryo-EM data in high-performance computing environments. J. Struct. Biol. 178, 139–151 (2012).
Chen, M. et al. Convolutional neural networks for automated annotation of cellular cryo-electron tomograms. Nat. Methods 14, 983–985 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We thank F. Sun and X. J. Huang (Institute of Biophysics, CAS) for their help with the apo-ferritin sample, H. Cheng (Tsinghua University) for the 20S proteasome sample, X. Q. Wang (Tsinghua University) for the ACE2 sample and N. Liu and J. Xu (Tsinghua University) for control data prepared on rGO grids. We are grateful to J. L. Lei, X. M. Li, F. Yang, N. Y. Zhou and T. Yang at the Tsinghua University Branch of the National Protein Science Facility (Beijing) for their technical support on the Cryo-EM and High-Performance Computation platforms. We acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31825009 to H.-W.W. and 22227807 to Z.O.). H.-W.W. is an awardee of the XPLORER PRIZE. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.-W.W. and Z.O. initiated the ESI-cryoPrep concept and conceived the research. Z.Y., J.F., X.Z. and J.W. performed the experiments. X.Z. designed the original installation. Z.Y., J.F. and X.F. performed the initial data evaluation. Z.Y. and J.F. prepared cryogenic specimens. Z.Y. collected the cryo-EM data, solved the cryo-EM structures, performed model building and analyzed spatial distribution data. J.F. collected the MS. H.-W.W., Z.O., J.W. and X.Z. supervised the research. Z.Y., J.F., H.-W.W., Z.O., J.W. and X.Z. contributed to writing of the paper. All the authors read and approved the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Methods thanks Yifan Cheng, Fred Sigworth and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. Primary Handling Editor: Arunima Singh, in collaboration with the Nature Methods team.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Parameter optimizations of sample preparation.
a, Structural preservation of apo-ferritin under different spraying conditions. Several parameters, like sample flow rate, high voltage, and protein concentration, affect protein samples of intact states differently. The particles in the blue squares represent the shape of the intact protein, while the particles in the green squares represent the disrupted and dispersed state. Conditions with moderately medium flow rates, lower voltages, and higher sample concentrations contribute to better structural integrity. Metal materials with low conductivity in nano-ESI would also make a difference in structural maintenance. b, shows the statistical analysis of the percentage of structurally intact proteins in EM negative-staining under different spraying conditions. Micrographs were collected and analyzed independently for each flow rate, high voltage value, protein concentration, and conductive material of nano-ESI. The sample sizes (n) were 5, 6, 15, and 5 for flow rates; 8, 17, and 7 for high voltage values; 15, 17, and 20 for protein concentrations; and 6, 12, 14, and 16 for conductive materials of nano-ESI, respectively. The bars indicating the highest proportions of intact particles represent the recommended optimal parameters. The central measure of the error bar is the mean, while the error bar represents the 95% confidence interval. The source data is included in a dedicated Source Data file.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Mass spectrums at different conditions.
Mass spectrometry data is obtained using apo-ferritin. The favorable conditions identified in EM align with those observed in native MS analysis. From top to bottom, mass spectrums of various conditions: the injection flow rate (a), the high voltage (b), the protein concentration (c), the distance from the tip to the EM grid (d), the desolvation gas flow rate (e), and various conductive materials for nano-ESI (f). The source data is included in a dedicated Source Data file.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Gold-standard and model-to-map FSC of ESI-cryoPrep and control datasets with matched particle counts.
The particle counts of ESI-cryoPrep subsets and control data align with those presented in Fig. 5d. The plot features the graph legend in one of its corners.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Particle contribution statistics for high-resolution reconstruction.
The proportion of particles contributed to high-resolution reconstruction. Particles of 70S ribosome and ACE2 using the conventional method on supporting films experienced considerable preferential orientation issues, resulting in the failure to reconstruct satisfactory 3D maps.
Extended Data Fig. 5 3DFSC analysis of ESI-cryoPrep and control datasets with complete and matched particle counts.
3DFSC analysis of 70S ribosome (a), 20S proteasome (b), apo-ferritin (c), and ACE2 (d). Owing to their high symmetry, the 20S proteasome and apo-ferritin exhibit slight improvements compared to the control data. By contrast, the 70S ribosome and ACE2 prepared by ESI-cryoPrep demonstrate substantial improvement of 3DFSC in all Fourier directions compared to the control.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Particle distributions of 70S ribosome and 20S proteasome in representative tomograms.
a-b, Top panel: Z-X slice views of 70S ribosome and 20S proteasome specimen tomograms. Purple arrows indicate crystal ice, while light and dark blue arrows denote the protein layer and graphene layer, respectively, illustrating particle distribution away from the air-water interface. Bottom panel: X-Y slice views of 70S ribosome and 20S proteasome specimen tomograms. Comparison of particle distributions on different slices reveals no direct contact between particles and the graphene film. The color code corresponds to that in the top panel.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Particle distributions of apo-ferritin and ACE2 in representative tomograms.
a-b, Top panel: Z-X slice views of apo-ferritin and ACE2 specimen tomograms. Purple arrows indicate crystal ice, while light and dark blue arrows denote the protein layer and graphene layer, respectively, illustrating particle distribution away from the air-water interface. Bottom panel: X-Y slice views of apo-ferritin and ACE2 specimen tomograms. Comparison of particle distributions on different slices reveals no direct contact between particles and the graphene film. The color code corresponds to that in the top panel.
Extended Data Fig. 8 EM data processing flowchart for 70S ribosome and 20S proteasome.
Structure determination and analysis of 70S ribosome (a) and 20S proteasome (b).
Extended Data Fig. 9 EM data processing flowchart for apo-ferritin and ACE2.
Structure determination and analysis of apo-ferritin (a) and ACE2 (b).
Extended Data Fig. 10 EM data processing flowchart for streptavidin.
Structure determination and analysis of streptavidin.
Supplementary information
Source data
Source Data Fig. 2
Statistical source data of Fig. 2d.
Source Data Fig. 4
Statistical source data of Fig. 4a.
Source Data Fig. 5
Statistical source data of Fig. 5b,c.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1
Statistical source data of Extended Data Fig. 1b.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2
Statistical source data of Extended Data Fig. 2a–f.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3
Statistical source data of Extended Data Fig. 3.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4
Statistical source data of Extended Data Fig. 4.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Z., Fan, J., Wang, J. et al. Electrospray-assisted cryo-EM sample preparation to mitigate interfacial effects. Nat Methods (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02247-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02247-0